DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_2_100

Evaluation of longitudinal arch of foot in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Downloads

Authors

  • 1 Samara State Medical University, 443001, Samara, Russia
  • 2 Dental clinic “Harmony of bite”, 443030, Samara, Russia
  • 3 Municipal dental clinic no. 3, 443030, Samara, Russia

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) is a multifactorial disease requiring a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. Numerous studies have shown the relationship between the condition of the TMD and the musculoskeletal system. The aim was to analyze the longitudinal arch of the foot in patients with painful TMJ syndrome. Materials and
Methods.
Forty patients (36 women, 4 men) from 25 to 42 years of age with TMD, without dentition integrity disorders, were examined to assess the condition of the longitudinal arch of the foot. The dental arches were evaluated according to Engle and measurements were made on a Greenfoot podoscope.
Results.
It was found that Engle class I occurred in 5% of patients. Bilateral class II was found in 45% of patients. Different occlusal classes on the right and on the left were found in 42.5% of the examined patients, which were combined as follows: Class I and II in 13 patients, Class I and III in 3 patients, and Class II and III in 1 patient. Thus, occlusal disorders of class II occur in 80% of patients. When analyzing the longitudinal arch of the foot, normal height was found in 2.5% of patients. High longitudinal arch was found in 70% of patients on both feet and in 15% on one foot.
Conclusion.
In 95% of patients with painful TMJ syndrome, improper dentition was observed. The height of the longitudinal arch of the foot was impaired in 97.5% of those examined. Thus, these signs are pathognomonic for painful TMD syndrome. The presence of Engle occlusal class II in 80% of patients with TMD indirectly indicates a forced, mostly distal, position of the mandible. An increase in the height of the longitudinal arch of the foot was detected in 85% of the examinees, the reasons for which should be investigated. The combination of high longitudinal arch of the foot with occlusal class II according to Engle was found in 75% of the examined patients, which indicates that TMD is realized mainly through violation of occlusal relations with distalization of the mandible and increase in the height of the longitudinal arch of the foot.

Key words:

temporomandibular joint, postural system, interdisciplinary approach, podoscopy, high longitudinal arch of foot

For Citation

[1]
Nesterov A.M., Tsymbalov E.E., Nikulina M.A. Evaluation of longitudinal arch of foot in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (2): 100—104. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_2_100

References

  1. Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V. Prediction of developing temporomandibular joint dysfunction in patients with maxillary dental anomalies. Perm Medical Journal. 2021; 3: 41—47 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 46192176
  2. Oreshaka O.V., Dement’eva E.A., Ganisik A.V., Sharov A.M. Epidemiology of temporomandibular joint disorders. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2019; 4 (92): 97—99 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41601796
  3. Murphy M.K., MacBarb R.F., Wong M.E., Athanasiou K.A. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of etiology, clinical management, and tissue engineering strategies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28 (6): e393—414. PMID: 24278954
  4. Martyusheva M.V., Shchekolova N.B., Astashina N.B. Justification of the need to assess the clinical and functional status of the musculoskeletal system in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Ural Medical Journal. 2020; 9 (192): 86—89 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 44206409
  5. Sorokina N.D., Pertsov S.S., Gioeva Yu.A., Selitsky G.V., Zangieva A.S. Relationship of postural disorders with temporomandibular joint dysfunction and state of other systems in the body. Journal of New Medical Technologies. 2019; 2: 47—52 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 38235315
  6. Alomar X., Medrano J., Cabratosa J., Clavero J.A., Lorente M., Serra I., Monill J.M., Salvador A. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007; 28 (3): 170—83. PMID: 17571700
  7. Greenbaum T., Dvir Z., Emodi-Perelmam A., Reiter S., Rubin P., Winocur E. Relationship between specific temporomandibular disorders and impaired upper neck performance. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020; 128 (4): 292—298. PMID: 32627243
  8. Gauer R.L., Semidey M.J. Diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Am Fam Physician. 2015; 91 (6): 378—86. PMID: 25822556
  9. Kim D., Ko S.G., Lee E.K., Jung B. The relationship between spinal pain and temporomandibular joint disorders in Korea: a nationwide propensity score-matched study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20 (1): 631. PMID: 31884949
  10. Tsimbalistov A.V., Petrosyan L.B., Ovsyannikov K.A., Gutorov U.A. The use of computer-assisted stabilometry data for treatment planning of patients with dentoalveolar deformities. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin: Medicine, Pharmacy. 2011; 16—1 (111): 229—236 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 20359757
  11. E.S. Bimbas, N.V. Mjagkova, O.A. L’vova, O.S. Roslova The interconnection between transversal malocclusions and violations of motor stereotypes. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2012; 3 (42): 19—24 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18336529
  12. Ishmurzin P.V. Influence of orthodontic treatment on quality of life index in patients with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2012; 1 (40): 41—43 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17431829
  13. Slavicek R. The masticatory organ: Functions and Dysfunctions. Klosterneuburg: Gamma, 2009. 544 p.
  14. Galimullina V., Lebedev S., Bragin A. The prevalence and structure of clinical manifestations of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2020; 2: 11—16 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 43783701
  15. Klimova T.N., Stepanov V.A., Udineyev V.A., Frolenko A.S. Electromyographic monitoring of masticatory muscles in the diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. In: Topical issues of dentistry. Kazan, 2018. Pp. 180—184 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35064456
  16. Mamedov Ad.A. et al. Diagnostic Methods Selection in Patients with Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction. The Dental Institute. 2019; 2 (83): 74—77 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 39184705
  17. Nadyrbekova A.N., Myrzabekov E.M. Clinical and functional study of the syndrome of pain dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint in young people with impaired occlusion of the dentition. Science, New technologies and Innovations in Kyrgyzstan. 2021; 2: 54—58 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 45700967
  18. Belousova K.S., Zubkova A.A. Etiology of dysfunctional disorders in the temporomandibular joint. International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2020; 3: 36 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 43176077
  19. Abdurakhmonova M.Sh., Amkhadov M.A., Khir BekM., Amkhadov I.S., Pisarenko I.K. Analytical estimation the modern methods of diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. Herald of Institute of Postgraduate Education in Health Sphere. 2020; 4: 74—82 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 45600732
  20. Mishra S.K., Somkuwar S., Chowdhary R. Occlusion and temporomandibular joint disorders. Temporomandibular Joint Disorders. Singapore: Springer, 2021. Pp. 133—143. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2754-5_10.
  21. Kutsevlyak V.I., Bayan A.M. Systematization of etiopathogenetic factors of the development of musculoskeletal dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. ScienceRise: Medical Science. 2018; 6 (26): 62—67 (In Russ.).
  22. Mitrirattanakul S., Jariyasakulroj S. Dental treatment as perceived etiology of temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2020; 38 (2): 109—114. PMID: 30048221
  23. Konareva Yu.S. On common methods of diagnosing deformities of human feet. In collection: Technologies, design, science, education in the context of inclusion. Moscow: Kosygin Russian State University (Technologies. Design. Art), 2018. pp. 54—63 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35461473

Downloads

Received

April 11, 2022

Published on

June 1, 2022