DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2024_4_154

Electrolytic method of decontamination of the surface of a dental implant in the treatment of patients with peri-implantitis. Literature review

Authors

  • I.A. Dzhafarli 1, postgraduate at the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3037-5842
  • D.M. Mukhamadiev 2, chief doctor
  • S.O. Chikunov 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, full professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-6424-2920
  • Y.V. Volkova 3, chief doctor
  • M.V. Mikhailova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-9267-1319
  • N.S. Gilmanova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-9024-7837
  • R.A. Abdulgafisov 4, 5th year student
    ORCID: 0009-0002-6298-8854
  • 1 Sechenov University, 119435, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Dental clinic “Academy”, 125167, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Periodontology Centre “Megapolis Dent”, 196128, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • 4 Dagestan State Medical University, 367000, Makhachkala, Russia

Abstract

From year to year, clinicians are developing the most effective method of decontaminating the surface of a dental implant to further replace lost hard and soft tissues. It is currently accepted that a surgical approach is necessary to gain adequate access to the contaminated implant surface. The essence of the article shows the result of electrolytic decontamination of the implant surface using the GalvoSurge device (GalvoSurge Dental AG, Switzerland) and a comparison of electrolysis with certain treatment regimens, including mechanical surface treatment.
Conclusion.
Electrolysis of surface implants in most articles showed excellent results in decontamination of the surface implant followed by further bone augmentation and soft tissue grafting in the area of the affected implants.

Key words:

peri-implantitis, electrochemical removal of biofilms, electrolytic cleaning, implant, re-osseointegration after electrolytic cleaning, regenerative therapy, decontamination, Galvosurge device

For Citation

[1]
Dzhafarli I.A., Mukhamadiev D.M., Chikunov S.O., Volkova Y.V., Mikhailova M.V., Gilmanova N.S., Abdulgafisov R.A. Electrolytic method of decontamination of the surface of a dental implant in the treatment of patients with peri-implantitis. Literature review. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2024; 27 (4): 154—159. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2024_4_154

References

  1. Akhmedov G.D. Role of microecology, immune and antioxidant systems in the development of infectious and inflammatory complications of outpatient oral surgery and their treatment: dissertation abstract. Moscow, 2012. 38 p. (In Russian).
  2. Lang N.P., Berglundh T., Working Group 4 of Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology Periimplant diseases: where are we now? — Consensus of the Seventh European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38 Suppl 11: 178—81. PMID: 21323713
  3. Berglundh T., et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1: S313-S318. PMID: 29926955
  4. Mombelli A., Décaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38 Suppl 11: 203—13. PMID: 21323716
  5. Mombelli A., Müller N., Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 6: 67—76. PMID: 23062130
  6. Derks J., Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42 Suppl 16: S158—71. PMID: 25495683
  7. Coli P., Christiaens V., Sennerby L., Bruyn H. Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri-implant health and disease. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 203—217. PMID: 28000267
  8. Esposito M., Grusovin M.G., Worthington H.V. Treatment of peri-implantitis: what interventions are effective? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5 Suppl: S21—41. PMID: 22834392
  9. Canullo L., Schlee M., Wagner W., Covani U., Montegrotto Group for the Study of Peri-implant Disease International brainstorming meeting on etiologic and risk factors of peri-implantitis, Montegrotto (Padua, Italy), August 2014. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30 (5): 1093—104. PMID: 26394346
  10. Dzhafarli I.A., Mukhamadiev D.M., Chikunov S.O. The results of a retrospective research with a follow-up period of more than 6 months of treatment of peri-implantitis using the implantoplasty with soft tissue volume augmentation. The Dental Institute. 2023; 2 (99): 44—47 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 54232553
  11. Sarmiento H.L., Norton M., Korostoff J., Ko K.I., Fiorellini J.P. Surgical alternatives for treating peri-implantitis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38 (5): 665—671. PMID: 30113606
  12. Rotenberg S.A., Steiner R., Tatakis D.N. Collagen-coated bovine bone in peri-implantitis defects: A pilot study on a novel approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 (3): 701—7. PMID: 27183078
  13. Isler S.C., Unsal B., Soysal F., Ozcan G., Peker E., Karaca I.R. The effects of ozone therapy as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018; 48 (3): 136—151. PMID: 29984044
  14. Romanos G.E., Nentwig G.H. Regenerative therapy of deep peri-implant infrabony defects after CO2 laser implant surface decontamination. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28 (3): 245—55. PMID: 18605600
  15. Aghazadeh A., Rutger Persson G., Renvert S. A single-centre randomized controlled clinical trial on the adjunct treatment of intra-bony defects with autogenous bone or a xenograft: results after 12 months. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39 (7): 666—73. PMID: 22548359
  16. Heitz-Mayfield L.J.A., Salvi G.E., Mombelli A., Loup P.J., Heitz F., Kruger E., Lang N.P. Supportive peri-implant therapy following anti-infective surgical peri-implantitis treatment: 5-year survival and success. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 (1): 1—6. PMID: 27335316
  17. Schlee M., Wang H.L., Stumpf T., Brodbeck U., Bosshardt D., Rathe F. Treatment of periimplantitis with electrolytic cleaning versus mechanical and electrolytic cleaning: 18-month results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Med. 2021; 10 (16): 3475. PMID: 34441770
  18. Schlee M., Rathe F., Brodbeck U., Ratka C., Weigl P., Zipprich H. Treatment of peri-implantitis-electrolytic cleaning versus mechanical and electrolytic cleaning — A randomized controlled clinical trial — six-month results. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (11): 1909. PMID: 31703404
  19. Hosseinpour S., Nanda A., Walsh L.J., Xu C. Microbial decontamination and antibacterial activity of nanostructured titanium dental implants: A narrative review. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11 (9): 2336. PMID: 34578650
  20. Schneider S., Rudolph M., Bause V., Terfort A. Electrochemical removal of biofilms from titanium dental implant surfaces. Bioelectrochemistry. 2018; 121: 84—94. PMID: 29413867
  21. Ratka C., Weigl P., Henrich D., Koch F., Schlee M., Zipprich H. The effect of in vitro electrolytic cleaning on biofilm-contaminated implant surfaces. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (9): 1397. PMID: 31500093
  22. Gianfreda F., Punzo A., Pistilli V., Bollero P., Cervino G., D’Amico C., Cairo F., Cicciù M. Electrolytic cleaning and regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis in the esthetic area: A case report. Eur J Dent. 2022; 16 (4): 950—956. PMID: 35785819
  23. Assunção M.A., Botelho J., Machado V., Proença L., Matos A.P.A., Mendes J.J., Bessa L.J., Taveira N., Santos A. Dental implant surface decontamination and surface change of an electrolytic method versus mechanical approaches: A pilot in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2023; 12 (4): 1703. PMID: 36836238
  24. Schlee M., Naili L., Rathe F., Brodbeck U., Zipprich H. Is complete re-osseointegration of an infected dental implant possible? Histologic results of a dog study: A short communication. J Clin Med. 2020; 9 (1): 235. PMID: 31963136

Received

February 14, 2024

Accepted

October 28, 2024

Published on

December 17, 2024