DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2024_2_28

The use of gum retraction systems in orthopedic dentistry: a literature review

Downloads

Authors

  • F.Sh. Dzhafarova 1, resident at the Prosthodontics and orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0009-0005-8525-1718
  • S.S. Gadzhieva 2, 5th year student at the Dentistry Faculty
    ORCID ID: 0009-0001-7156-0430
  • G.V. Toboev 3, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Dentistry Department No. 2
  • A.Sh. Kecherukova 4, 5th year student at the Dentistry Faculty
    ORCID ID: 0009-0004-4256-8830
  • A.R. Zoloev 5, 5th year student at the Dentistry Faculty
    ORCID ID: 0009-0006-1049-8334
  • R.K. Esiev 3, assistant at the Dentistry Department No. 2
    ORCID ID: 0009-0003-8739-7054
  • O.M. Mrikaeva 6, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Therapeutic, surgical and pediatric dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7339-7657
  • 1 Volgograd State Medical University, 400131, Volgograd, Russia
  • 2 Saratov State Medical University, 410012, Saratov, Russia
  • 3 North Ossetian State Medical Academy, 362019, Vladikavkaz, Russia
  • 4 Rostov State Medical University, 344022, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
  • 5 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 6 North Ossetian State University, 362025, Vladikavkaz, Russia

Abstract

Gingival retraction is a key step in prosthetics because the ledge, which supports the future crown part of the denture, must be reproduced on the impression in a high-quality manner. In this way, gingival retraction actually makes it possible to visualize the final preparation line and to reproduce the border of the future restoration qualitatively. Gingival retraction methods can be classified as mechanical, chemical or surgical. This article describes the various methods of gingival retraction, which include unimpregnated threads, medicated threads, threadless methods, astringent hemostatic agents, gingival retraction paste, vasoconstrictive agents, lasers, rotary scraping, and electrosurgery. Gingival retraction techniques for dental implant prosthetics and digital impressions are also discussed.

Key words:

orthopedic dentistry, planning treatment, preparation, gum retraction, retraction cord, retraction pastes, Impression

For Citation

[1]
Dzhafarova F.Sh., Gadzhieva S.S., Toboev G.V., Kecherukova A.Sh., Zoloev A.R., Esiev R.K., Mrikaeva O.M. The use of gum retraction systems in orthopedic dentistry: a literature review. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2024; 27 (2): 28—34. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2024_2_28

References

  1. Kostić I., Najman S., Kostić M., Stojanović S. Comparative review of gingival retraction agents. Acta medica Medianae. 2012; 51: 81—83.
  2. Chandra S., Singh A., Gupta K.K., Chandra C., Arora V. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (2): 177—82. PMID: 26443067
  3. Prasanna G.S., Reddy K., Kumar R.K., Shivaprakash S. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14 (2): 217—21. PMID: 23811648
  4. Alraheam I.A., Hattar S., Al-Asmar A., Alhadidi A., Hamour S.A., Aldroubi A., Sawair F.A. Dentists’ knowledge and preference regarding gingival displacement methods. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23 (1): 574. PMID: 37587482
  5. Kumar M.P., Patil S.G., Dheeraj B., Reddy K., Goel D., Krishna G. A comparison of accuracy of matrix impression system with putty reline technique and multiple mix technique: An in vitro study. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7 (6): 48—53. PMID: 26124599
  6. Sultana A., Rahman M.M., et al. Clinical evaluation of gingival retraction systems in gingival tissue displacement procedure for fixed prosthesis. Journal of Oral Health. 2020; 22 (2): 27—32.
  7. Shalimon A., Ravichandran R., et al. Evaluation of three different non-invasive gingival displacement systems on the amount of gingival retraction in fixed prosthodontic treatment — an observational study. Journal of Prosthodontics Dentistry. 2023; 18 (1—1): 19—28.
  8. Tao X., Yao J.W., Wang H.L., Huang C. Comparison of gingival troughing by laser and retraction cord. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018; 38 (4): 527—532. PMID: 29889917
  9. Adnan S., Agwan M.A. Gingival retraction techniques: A review. Dental Update. 2018; 45 (4): 284—297. DOI: 10.12968/denu.2018.45.4.284
  10. Mathew L., Mathew A., Saranya S.K., Mohan A.S. Estimation of cytokine levels in gingival crevicular fluid following the use of different gingival retraction systems in patients requiring fixed partial dentures — An original research. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2022; 12 (5): 709—712. PMID: 36092456
  11. Igic M., Kostic M., Basic J., Krunic N., Pejcic A., Gligorijevic N., Milic Lemic A. Bleeding index and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 as gingival inflammation parameters after chemical-mechanical retraction procedure. Med Princ Pract. 2020; 29 (5): 492—498. PMID: 32241014
  12. Tarighi P., Khoroushi M. A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014; 11 (4): 423—8. PMID: 25225553
  13. Nespriadko V.P., Terekhov S.S. Gum retraction methods in orthopedic dentistry: current state of the problem. Art of Medicine. 2023; 24: 176—180 (In Ukrainian). DOI: 10.21802/artm.2022.4.24.176
  14. Golaszewska A., Misztal T., Marcinczyk N., Chabielska E., Rusak T. Adrenaline may contribute to prothrombotic condition via augmentation of platelet procoagulant response, enhancement of fibrin formation, and attenuation of fibrinolysis. Front Physiol. 2021; 12: 657881. PMID: 34025450
  15. Hameed M.S., Kamran M.A. Effect of two hemostatic agents containing Aluminium chloride and ferric sulfate on bond integrity of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022; 38: 102880. PMID: 35472642
  16. Madaan R., Paliwal J., Sharma V., Meena K.K., Dadarwal A., Kumar R. Comparative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of four different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study. Cureus. 2022; 14 (4): e23923. PMID: 35530916
  17. Feng Y.Z., Zeng X.H. [The retractive effects of different gingival retraction agents]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011; 29 (1): 53—6 (In Chinese). PMID: 21427901
  18. Conrad H.J., Holtan J.R. Internalized discoloration of dentin under porcelain crowns: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 101 (3): 153—7. PMID: 19231565
  19. Singer L., Habib S.I., Shalaby H.E., Saniour S.H., Bourauel C. Digital assessment of properties of the three different generations of dental elastomeric impression materials. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22 (1): 379. PMID: 36064393
  20. Savkina A.A., Lengert E.V., Ermakov A.V., Popykhova E.B., Stepanova T.V., Ivanov A.N. Experimental testing of tannic acid target delivery system for correcting periodontal microcirculation. Saratov Medical Journal. 2022; 1: 1—6. DOI: 10.15275/sarmj.2022.0103
  21. Kumari S., Singh P., Parmar U.G., Patel A.M. Evaluation of effectiveness of three new gingival retraction systems: A comparative study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22 (8): 922—927. PMID: 34753845
  22. Shetty G., Pai U., Shetty N. A qualitative analysis of magic foam and the conventional gingival retraction cord system in dental impressions. World Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 12 (6): 479—484. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1876
  23. Acar Ö., Erkut S., Özçelik T.B., Ozdemır E., Akçil M. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111 (5): 388—94. PMID: 24360008
  24. Sarmento H.R., Leite F.R., Dantas R.V., Ogliari F.A., Demarco F.F., Faot F. A double-blind randomised clinical trial of two techniques for gingival displacement. J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41 (4): 306—13. PMID: 24446590
  25. Deogade S.C., Mantri S.S., Dube G., Shrivastava R., Noorani S. A new trend in recording subgingival tissue around an implant while making a direct abutment impression. Case Rep Dent. 2014; 2014: 847408. PMID: 24987534
  26. Rodin M.A. Modern materials for retraction marginal periodontal. International Student Scientific Bulletin. 2016; 2: 13 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 27290821
  27. Shemonaev V.I., Klimova T.N., Mikhalchenko D.V., Poroshin A.V., Stepanov V.A. Clinical experince with diode laser dental treatment stages. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2014; 3: 487 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 22528294
  28. Arsenina O.I., Shugaylov I.A., Nadtochiy A.G., Popova N.V., Makhortova P.I., Popova A.V., Aganov M.S. Improving the effectiveness of treatment of the adult patients with dentoalveolar anomalies and deformities using Er,Cr:YSGG laser: a clinical study. Stomatology. 2021; 1: 34—43 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44618882
  29. Tetè S., Mastrangelo F., Bianchi A., Zizzari V., Scarano A. Collagen fiber orientation around machined titanium and zirconia dental implant necks: an animal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 (1): 52—8. PMID: 19344025
  30. Chang Y.S., Bennani V., Tawse-Smith A., Girvan L. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25 (6): 492—9. PMID: 22147228

Downloads

Received

October 13, 2023

Accepted

May 20, 2024

Published on

June 28, 2024