DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2024_1_26

The use of 3D-scanning in plastic periodontal surgery

Downloads

Authors

  • L.A. Ananeva 1, PhD candidate at the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-1790-9459
  • S.N. Razumova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-9533-9204
  • A.S. Brago 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-8947-4357
  • S.A. Ikramova 1, PhD candidate at the Dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-2470-227X
  • L.A. Burlakova 1, postgraduate at the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-5321-3304
  • A.V. Kucherova 1, clinical resident at the Maxillofacial surgery and surgical dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0009-0005-3872-552X
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

There is no reference objective method for measuring the depth of recession, the ratio of gingival compartments and the depth of the oral vestibule; therefore, to assess these quantitative indicators of gingival condition besides probing it is necessary to use additional methods of diagnostics of the state of periodontal tissue configuration to obtain digital values. The application of digital 3D-technologies in plastic periodontal surgery is poorly studied, but it can be quite an informative method of examination. The aim is to compare the results of measuring the state of periodontal tissues during probing and intraoral scanning with the use of digital technologies.
Materials and methods.
Gingival recession of the III class was eliminated simultaneously in 5 patients by the method proposed at the department and plasty of the shallow vestibule of the oral cavity was performed. The condition of the gingiva was evaluated by probing and intraoral 3D-scanning before the operation and 6 months later.
Results.
Median measurements of gingival recession using the two methods were equal: for probing — 3.0 mm (Q1—Q3=1.5—5.0 mm), for intraoral 3D-scanning — 3.32 mm (Q1—Q3=0.97—5.71 mm).
Conclusion.
Application of intraoral 3D-scanning of jaws as a diagnostic method allows to obtain data on the state of soft tissue configuration comparable with probing data.

Key words:

probing, intraoral scanning, gum recession, small vestible of oral cavity

For Citation

[1]
Ananeva L.A., Razumova S.N., Brago A.S., Ikramova S.A., Burlakova L.A., Kucherova A.V. The use of 3D-scanning in plastic periodontal surgery. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2024; 27 (1): 26—30. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2024_1_26

References

  1. Gil A., Bakhshalian N., Min S., Zadeh H.H. Treatment of multiple recession defects with vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (VISTA): A retrospective pilot study utilizing digital analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30 (6): 572—579. PMID: 30367715
  2. Zuhr O., Akakpo D., Eickholz P., Vach K., Hürzeler M.B., Petsos H., Research Group for Oral Soft Tissue Biology & Wound Healing. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results of an RCT using 3D digital measurement technology for volumetric comparison of soft tissue changes. J Clin Periodontol. 2021; 48 (7): 949—961. PMID: 33847022
  3. Zuhr O., Rebele S.F., Schneider D., Jung R.E., Hürzeler M.B. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014; 41 (6): 582—92. PMID: 24117676
  4. Aydinyurt H.S., Ertugrul A.S. A novel volumetric analysis using cad/cam scanners in gingival recession treatment. Medical Science and Discovery. 2017; 4 (10): 72—79. DOI: 10.17546/msd.341826
  5. Marques T., Santos N.M., Fialho J., Montero J., Correia A. A new digital evaluation protocol applied in a retrospective analysis of periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 20399. PMID: 34650129
  6. Volovikov O., Velichko E., Razumova S., Bait Said O. The first case report about noninvasive impression taking in orthodontic patient with epidermolysis bullosa. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2021; 14 (4): 1587—1591. http://tinyurl.com/39ac63te
  7. Icen M., Orhan K., Şeker Ç., Geduk G., Cakmak Özlü F., Cengiz M.İ. Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 49 (5): 20190197. PMID: 3213438
  8. Kuralt M., Gašperšič R., Fidler A. Methods and parameters for digital evaluation of gingival recession: A critical review. J Dent. 2022; 118: 103793. PMID: 34481931
  9. Fageeh H.N., Meshni A.A., Jamal H.A., Preethanath R.S., Halboub E. The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19 (1): 154. PMID: 31311544
  10. Ananeva L.A., Runova G.S. Method for one-stage elimination of class III gingival recession and vestibuloplasty. Patent RU #2732313, effective from 29.05.2019 (In Russian).
  11. Hong-Seok P., Chintal S. Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner. Procedia Engineering. 2015; 100: 1174—1181. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.481
  12. Lehmann K.M., Kasaj A., Ross A., Kämmerer P.W., Wagner W., Scheller H. A new method for volumetric evaluation of gingival recessions: a feasibility study. J Periodontol. 2012; 83 (1): 50—4. PMID: 21563950

Downloads

Received

November 19, 2023

Accepted

February 26, 2024

Published on

March 21, 2024