DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_2_150

Developing methods of matching 3D facial images with computed tomography data

Authors

  • S.V. Apresyan 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics Department, director of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3281-707X
  • A.G. Stepanov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Dentistry Department, professor of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6543-0998
  • A.P. Zrazhevskaya 1, postgraduate at the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1210-5841
  • M.S. Sarkisyan 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4132-9377
  • V.K. Suonio 1, assistant at the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4642-6758
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The need to introduce digital technologies in facial prosthetics is dictated by an increase the number of oncological disease of the middle zone of the face and defects in the middle zone of the face of various etiologies. This study aimed to develop a method for matching three-dimensional images of the face with CT data and confirm its effectiveness.
Materials and methods.
To develop a methodology for combining virtual three-dimensional images of the face with CT data, reference objects in the form of 4 balls with diameter 5 mm were used. Scan and CT data were combined in Exocad (Germany). For the accuracy of matching 3D-scans with CT data, we chose 4 points on the patient's face, where the manufactured balls were attached: on the nose, on the chin and in the cheek area on both sides. Then the CT was done and facial 3D-scans were taken using scanners: 3dMDFace System (3dMD, USA/UK), ObiScanner (Fifth Ingenium, Italy), Einstar (Shining 3D, China). The obtained data were combined in Exocad. The data obtained on the Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace (Finland) were used as a reference model, since this setup allows to get both a CBVT and three-dimensional photograph in one scanning pass, the patient's position, facial expression and muscle arrangement are the same for both specifield images, which ensures their exact compatibility. To check the distances between points obtained from the reference model, we used the InVesalius 3 (Brazil), which creates a 3D visualization of images based on a sequence of 2D DICOM files.
Results.
The conducted researches confirm that the error of matching 3D-face scans with computed tomography data (the difference in distances between the selected bone and soft tissue points) using the ObiScanner compared to Planmeca ProMax 3D ProFace reference model is 0.09—0.16 mm. The error using 3dMDFace System scanner is 0.20—0.40 mm. The error in compiling three-dimensional data between each other using Einstar scanner is 0.35—0.60 mm. By combining 3D face scans with computed tomography data on reference objects, we observe a slight deviation from the reference model (0.09—0.16 mm), that confirms the accuracy of the method of combining data on reference objects.
Conclusion.
The obtained statistical data, the conclusion is combination of three-dimensional data of face scanners with CT data by objects is the most accurate technique, taking into account suitable source three-dimensional data of face scan.

Key words:

combination methodology, face scanner, facial prostheses, digital dental technologies, face scan

For Citation

[1]
Apresyan S.V., Stepanov A.G., Zrazhevskaya A.P., Sarkisyan M.S., Suonio V.K. Developing methods of matching 3D facial images with computed tomography data. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2023; 26 (2): 150—157. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_2_150

References

  1. Ryakhovsky A.N., Polyakova M.V. Analysis of accuracy of matching virtual models and edentulous jaws of a patient in different ways. The Dental Institute. 2012; 3 (56): 64—67 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 18038206
  2. Apresyan S.V., Stepanov A.G., Vardanyan B.A. Digital protocol for comprehensive planning of dental treatment. Clinical case analysis. Stomatology. 2021; 3: 65—71 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 46222733
  3. Kostiukova V.V., Riakhovskiĭ A.N., Ukhanov M.M. Comparative study of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Stomatology. 2014; 1: 53—59 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 21218165
  4. Apresyan S.V., Suonio V.K., Stepanov A.G., Kovalskaya T.V. Evaluation of functional potential of CAD-programs in integrated digital planning of dental treatment. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 3: 131—134 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44005657
  5. Apresyan S.V., Stepanov A.G., Retinskaya M.V., Suonio V.K. Development of complex of digital planning of dental treatment and assessment of its clinical effectiveness. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 3: 135—140 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44005658
  6. Borodina I.D., Grigoryants L.S., Gadzhiev M.A., Apresyan S.S., Batov R.V., Stepanov A.G., Apresyan S.V. Comparative evaluation of the accuracy of the dental arch display using modern intraoral three-dimensional scanners. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 4: 287—297 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 49487536
  7. Patel A., Levine J., Brecht L., Saadeh P., Hirsch D.L. Digital technologies in mandibular pathology and reconstruction. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012; 20 (1): 95—106. PMID: 22365432
  8. Muelleman T.J., Peterson J., Chowdhury N.I., Gorup J., Camarata P., Lin J. Individualized surgical approach planning for petroclival tumors using a 3D printer. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2016; 77 (3): 243—8. PMID: 27175320
  9. Daniel M., Watson J., Hoskison E., Sama A. Frontal sinus models and onlay templates in osteoplastic flap surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 2011; 125 (1): 82—5. PMID: 20831849
  10. Nishimoto S., Sotsuka Y., Kawai K., Fujita K., Kakibuchi M. Three-dimensional mock-up model for chondral framework in auricular reconstruction, built with a personal three-dimensional printer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134 (1): 180e-181e. PMID: 25028847
  11. Apresyan S.V., Stepanov A.G., Antonik M.M., Degtyarev N.E., Kravets P.L., Likhnenko M.N., Malazonia T.T., Sarkisyan B.A. Comprehensive digital planning of dental treatment: a practical guide. Moscow: Mozartica, 2020. Pp. 218—235 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 49243391
  12. Zimmermann M., Mehl A. Virtual smile design systems: a current review. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18 (4): 303—17. PMID: 26734665
  13. Ryakhovsky A.N. The new concept of 4D virtual planning in dentistry. Digital Dentistry. 2019; 1: 11—21 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 39165059
  14. Riakhovskiĭ A.N. Aesthetogramma as qualitative appreciation of dentitions visual image. Stomatology. 2009; 4: 63—67 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 13332504
  15. Coachman C., Calamita M.A., Sesma N. Dynamic documentation of the smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37 (2): 183—193. PMID: 28196157
  16. Chae M.P., Rozen W.M., McMenamin P.G., Findlay M.W., Spychal R.T., Hunter-Smith D.J. Emerging applications of bedside 3D printing in plastic surgery. Front Surg. 2015; 2: 25. PMID: 26137465
  17. Abbas A.T. Reconstruction skeleton for the lower human jaw using CAD/CAM/CAE. Journal of King Saud University Engineering Sciences. 2012; 24 (2): 159—164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jksues.2011.10.003

Received

February 16, 2023

Accepted

April 10, 2023

Published on

July 6, 2023