DOI:
10.37988/1811-153X_2023_1_147Stress-deformed state of a non-removable prosthesis on implants under mustering load depending on the angle of abutment wall tilt
Downloads
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of implant-supported fixed prostheses, a number of issues related to their manufacture remain debatable. Many authors raise the question of the necessary degree of inclination of the abutment walls to improve the passive fit and stability of the prosthesis, which determined the relevance and purpose of this publication. >. A study of the stress-strain state of the components of a fixed prosthesis during cementation on an abutment (ceramic veneer, frame, cement, abutment) was carried out using the finite element method (FEM), depending on the design of the fixed prosthesis, the height and angle of inclination of the abutment walls. A total of 99 models were studied and analyzed. >. The analysis of the obtained results showed that with three differently directed chewing loads on fixed prostheses, with an increase in the angle of inclination of the abutment walls, the level of stress-strain state values in the ceramic veneer statistically significantly (p≤0.05) decreases over the entire surface. Also, with an increase in the angle of inclination of the walls of the abutments, the level of maximum tensile stresses over the entire volume of the framework decreases statistically significantly (p≤0.05). When analyzing the results of studying stresses in the cement layer with an increase in the angle of inclination of the abutment walls, the level of tangential and tensile stresses in the cement layer increases statistically significantly (p≤0.05) with a masticatory load at an angle of 30° — 200 N and a transverse masticatory load of 100 N at an increase in the angle of inclination of the walls of the abutment as a result of the excessive conical surface of the abutment, these stresses can lead to decementation of the fixed prosthesis. The study of the stress-strain state of abutments under three differently directed masticatory loads showed a sharp surge of stresses in their upper part at an inclination angle of 10° and a diameter of 4.5 mm in fixed metal-ceramic prostheses on a single support, on two supports, on three supports, and statistically significant (p≤0.05) a 3.7-fold decrease in stress values with a decrease in the angle of inclination to 8°. >. It has been established that the height and angle of inclination of the abutment walls affect the uneven distribution of stresses in the ceramic veneer, framework, cement layer and abutment.Key words:
chewing load, implant, abutment, fixed prostheses, ceramic-metal, wall inclination angle, convergence, stress-strain stateFor Citation
[1]
Abakarov S.I., Sorokin D.V., Lapushko V.Yu., Abakarova S.S. Stress-deformed state of a non-removable prosthesis on implants under mustering load depending on the angle of abutment wall tilt. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2023; 26 (1): 147—157. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_1_147
References
- Mosharraf R., Abbasi M., Givehchian P. The effect of abutment angulation and crown material compositions on stress distribution in 3-unit fixed implant-supported prostheses: A finite element analysis. Int J Dent. 2022; 2022: 4451810. PMID: 36065400
- Strauss F.J., Siegenthaler M., Hämmerle C.H.F., Sailer I., Jung R.E., Thoma D.S. Restorative angle of zirconia restorations cemented on non-original titanium bases influences the initial marginal bone loss: 5-year results of a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022; 33 (7): 745—756. PMID: 35570366
- de Aguiar Vilela Júnior R., Aranha L.C., Elias C.N., Martinez E.F. In vitro analysis of prosthetic abutment and angulable frictional implant interface adaptation: Mechanical and microbiological study. J Biomech. 2021; 128: 110733. PMID: 34530293
- López-Jarana P., Díaz-Castro C.M., Falcão A., Ríos-Carrasco B., Fernandez-Palacín A., Ríos-Santos J.V., Herrero-Climent M. Is it possible to monitor implant stability on a prosthetic abutment? An in vitro resonance frequency analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17 (11): 4073. PMID: 32521612
- Lee M.Y., Heo S.J., Park E.J., Park J.M. Comparative study on stress distribution around internal tapered connection implants according to fit of cement- and screw-retained prostheses. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5 (3): 312—8. PMID: 24049573
- Abakarov S.I., Sorokin D.V., Lapushko V.Y., Nikiforova K.I. Analysis of the fit quality of the metal frames on implants depending on the abutment taper. Stomatology. 2021; 6: 56—60 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 47402457
- Rathod A., Jalaluddin M., Shrinivas, Devadiga T.J., Jha S., Alzahrani K.M. Geometry of implant abutment surface improving cement effectiveness: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021; 13 (Suppl 2): S1093-S1097. PMID: 35017936
- Mishra K., Singh P., Noorani M.K., Adarsh K., Kalburgi M.N., Mallik M. Evaluation of change in implant abutment after teeth surface modifications. Bioinformation. 2021; 17 (1): 157—161. PMID: 34393431
- Rosas J., Mayta-Tovalino F., Malpartida-Carrillo V., Degregori A.M., Mendoza R., Guerrero M.E. Effect of abutment geometry and luting agents on the vertical marginal discrepancy of cast copings on implant abutments: An in vitro study. Int J Dent. 2021; 2021: 9950972. PMID: 34239569
- Safari S., Hosseini Ghavam F., Amini P., Yaghmaei K. Effects of abutment diameter, luting agent type, and re-cementation on the retention of implant-supported CAD/CAM metal copings over short abutments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10 (1): 1—7. PMID: 29503708
- Chaar M.S., Att W., Strub J.R. Prosthetic outcome of cement-retained implant-supported fixed dental restorations: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38 (9): 697—711. PMID: 21395638
- Ali A.O., Kelly J.R., Zandparsa R. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings. J Prosthodont. 2012; 21 (8): 614—21. PMID: 22823334
- Rödiger M., Rinke S., Ehret-Kleinau F., Pohlmeyer F., Lange K., Bürgers R., Gersdorff N. Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6 (3): 233—40. PMID: 25006388
- Yoon S.S., Cheong C., Preisser J. Jr, Jun S., Chang B.M., Wright R.F. Measurement of total occlusal convergence of 3 different tooth preparations in 4 different planes by dental students. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112 (2): 285—92. PMID: 24726595
- Rodriguez L.C., Saba J.N., Meyer C.A., Chung K.H., Wadhwani C., Rodrigues D.C. A finite element analysis of novel vented dental abutment geometries for cement-retained crown restorations. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016; 2 (2): 136—145. PMID: 29744160
- Rödiger M., Kloß J., Gersdorff N., Bürgers R., Rinke S. Removal forces of adhesively and self-adhesively luted implant-supported zirconia copings depend on abutment geometry. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 87: 119—123. PMID: 30056309
- Beuer F., Edelhoff D., Gernet W., Naumann M. Effect of preparation angles on the precision of zirconia crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM system. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27 (6): 814—20. PMID: 19241690
- Tiu J., Al-Amleh B., Waddell J.N., Duncan W.J. Clinical tooth preparations and associated measuring methods: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (3): 175—84. PMID: 25449611
- Choi K.H., Son K., Lee D.H., Lee K.B. Influence of abutment height and convergence angle on the retrievability of cement-retained implant prostheses with a lingual slot. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10 (5): 381—387. PMID: 30370030
- Zhao L., Weigl P., Wu Y., Xu Y. In vitro study of bond strength between abutments with different degrees of convergence and crowns by pre-bonding method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34 (1): 25—30. PMID: 30695084
- Schriwer C., Gjerdet N.R., Arola D., Øilo M. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater. 2021; 37 (8): e427-e434. PMID: 33910755
- Zhang Y., Yu P., Yu H. Stress distribution and microgap formation in angulated zirconia abutments with a titanium base in narrow diameter implants: A 3D finite element analysis. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2022; 38 (7): e3610. PMID: 35490303
- Huang Y.C., Ding S.J., Yuan C., Yan M. Biomechanical analysis of rigid and non-rigid connection with implant abutment designs for tooth-implant supported prosthesis: A finite element analysis. J Dent Sci. 2022; 17 (1): 490—499. PMID: 35028075
- Cicciu M., Bramanti E., Matacena G., Guglielmino E., Risitano G. FEM evaluation of cemented-retained versus screw-retained dental implant single-tooth crown prosthesis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014; 7 (4): 817—25. PMID: 24955150
- Sim B.K., Kim B., Kim M.J., Jeong G.H., Ju K.W., Shin Y.J., Kim M.Y., Lee J.H. Hollow abutment screw design for easy retrieval in case of screw fracture in dental implant system. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017: 4842072. PMID: 29065610
- Olesova V.N., Bronstein D.A., Uzunyan N.A., Zaslavsky R.S., Lerner A.Ya., Shmatov K.V. Biomechanics of implant retained fixed prosthesis in patient with edentulous upper jaw. Stomatology. 2018; 6: 53—56 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 36647244
- Singh N.K., Chalapathy S.B., Thota R.P., Chakravarthula K., Tirnati R., Yenugupalli K. Evaluation of stress distribution among two different pre-angled abutments of implants in two different densities of bone at different levels along the implant in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19 (11): 1370—1375. PMID: 30602643
- Macedo J.P., Pereira J., Faria J., Souza J.C.M., Alves J.L., López-López J., Henriques B. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018; 21 (12): 655—662. PMID: 30693810
- Li Z., Gao S., Chen H., Ma R., Wu T., Yu H. Micromotion of implant-abutment interfaces (IAI) after loading: correlation of finite element analysis with in vitro performances. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019; 57 (5): 1133—1144. PMID: 30656596
- Cervino G., Romeo U., Lauritano F., Bramanti E., Fiorillo L., D'Amico C., Milone D., Laino L., Campolongo F., Rapisarda S., Cicciù M. FEM and von Mises analysis of OSSTEM® dental implant structural components: Evaluation of different direction dynamic loads. Open Dent J. 2018; 12: 219—229. PMID: 29682092
- Poyurovskaya I.Ya. Dental materials science: schoolbook. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2007. 192 p. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 19540163
Downloads
Received
November 21, 2022
Accepted
February 14, 2023
Published on
March 22, 2023