DOI:
10.37988/1811-153X_2020_4_99Current trends and problems of division of labor in dentistry
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study current trends and topical problems of the division of labor in dentistry. Materials and methods. Various sources of information were analyzed, including special literature, regulatory legal acts, advertisements on job sites and official statistics; a systemic approach, content analysis and comparative method were used. Results. The applied value of the main normative documents that define today the professional model of a dentist (Professional standard, Nomenclature of specialties, Qualification requirements) is revealed. The advantages and disadvantages of the narrowly focused specialization of dentists are noted. The analysis of the existing practice of using auxiliary personnel in dental clinics is carried out. It is pointed out the shortcomings of providing nurses to doctors of state dental institutions, as well as the fact that the current regulations define the functions of a nurse without taking into account dental specifics. At the same time, dental assistants work in private clinics, but this category of medical personnel is not formally available, since it is not provided for by current legislation. Conclusion. Based on the analysis, concludes that it is necessary to develop a concept of the division of labor in dentistry, which makes it possible to determine the roles (compositions of functions) of various dental specialists, the rational boundaries of the specialization of dentists and the criteria for assigning certain medical actions to the exclusive competence of a particular specialty. Along with this, it is proposed, as a priority, to officially introduce a new specialty “Nursing in dentistry” and the position of dental assistant.
Key words:
division of labor, specialization, dental specialties, dentist, dental auxiliaries, dental assistant, dental nurseFor Citation
References
- Vetshev P.S., Levchuk A.L., Alistratov D.I. “Surgery at the crossways” — in 90th year honor of Professor S.P. Fedorov. — Endoscopic surgery. — 2018: 24 (1): 3—9 (In Russ.).
- Davydovsky I.V. Clinical and anatomical conferences, their place and significance in the system of hospital work. — Archive of Pathology. — 2015: 77 (1): 4—8 (In Russ.).
- Danilov E.O. About specialization of dentists (historical, organizational and legal aspects). — The Dental Institute. — 2019; (85): 18—20 (In Russ.).
- Danilov E.O. On the issue of auxiliary personnel in dentistry. — The Dental Institute. — 2020; 3 (88): 10—2 (In Russ.).
- Kostlan J. Oral health services in Europe. Moscow: Medicine, 1982. — P. 193 (In Russ.).
- Resources and activities of medical healthcare organizations. Medical personnel 2018 / Statistical collection. Moscow: Ministry of Health of Russia, 2019: 280 (In Russ.).
- Tikhomirov A.V. Stratification of the medical community. — Chief physician: Economy and Law. — 2013; 3: 25—31 (In Russ.).
- Allred H. The training and use of dental auxiliary personnel: report on a study. — Copenhagen: WHO, 1977. — 70 p.
- Baltutis L., Morgan M. The changing role of dental auxiliaries: A literature review. — Austral. Dent. J. — 1998; 43 (5): 354—8.
- Beazoglou T., Chen L., Lazar V. et al. Expanded function allied dental personnel and dental practice productivity and efficiency. — J. Dent. Education. — 2012; 76 (8): 1054—60.
- Dental Specialties and Continuing Professional Education. Council of European Chief Dental Officers. 1994. https://cecdo.org
- Kracher C., Breen C., McMahon K. et al. The Evolution of the Dental Assisting Profession. — J. Dent. Education. — 2017; 81 (9): 30—7.
- Kravitz A.S., Bullock A., Cowpe J., Barnes E. Manual of dental practice 2015 (edition 5.1). Cardiffy: Council of European Dentists. 2015. https://eudental.eu
- Sanz M., Widstrom E., Eaton K. Is there a need for a common framework of dental specialties in Europe? — Eur. J. Dent. Education. — 2008: 12 (3): 138—143.
- Stanislav L. Expanded duties and dental assistant education. — J. Tennessee Dent. Association. — 2010; 90 (1): 14.