DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_4_67

Implant supported rehabilitation on upper jaw with minor amount of fixtures (3 years follow up)

Authors

  • R.A. Rozov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, chief physician
  • A.B. Gerasimov 1, chief dental surgeon, implantologist
  • G.S. Azarin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, dental surgeon, implantologist
  • A.V. Gusev 1, dental technician
  • 1 City Dental Clinic no. 33, 197341, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Active ousting of conventional prosthesis from total rehabilitation strategy by implant supported prosthetics is related with obvious tendency of decreasing the number of abutments for such suprastructures in the course of high survival rates of these prostheses and implants as well. Materials and methods. Despite of increased clinical and technological complexity of the workflow in comparison with conventional cement retained bridges, screw retention of such long span implant supported prosthesis provides the possibility of regular prothesis removal for professional hygiene and maintenance. The search in Prosthodontcs for options of the quick and regular retrieval of such prostheses is very relevant now, taking into consideration the increasing demand in fixed solutions among elderly and senile population combined with difficulties to ensure high level of unassisted oral hygiene by these group of patients. Results. 3 years follow up results are presented in this article (based on medical records extracts of three patients) of implant supported prosthetics retained by horizontal screws on limited amount of fixtures. 100% survival rate is demonstrated for “BlueSKY fast&fixed” (bredent Medical, Senden, Germany) implant rehabilitation solution with immediate loading, furthermore bridges supported by 4 or 6 implants showed similar results. Conclusion. Fixation option of the prosthesis with horizontal screws opens prospects for performing regular (4—6 times a year) professional maintenance of the implant suprastructures by dental hygienists in order to achieve periimplant tissue health of elderly and senile patients.

Key words:

implant supported prosthetics, geriatric dentistry, mplant supported rehabilitation with minor amount of fixtures, implant dentistry, cementation of dental prosthesis, suprastructure screw retention on implants

For Citation

[1]
Rozov R.A., Gerasimov A.B., Azarin G.S., Gusev A.V. Implant supported rehabilitation on upper jaw with minor amount of fixtures (3 years follow up). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 4 (96): 67—74. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_4_67

References

  1. Trezubov V.N., Bulycheva E.A., Chikunov S.O., Rozov R.A. Peculiarities and consequences of the immediate implant prosthetics using extended prosthodontics constructions. — Clinical dentistry (Russia). — 2018; 1 (85): 34—8 (In Russ.).
  2. Trezubov V.N., Rozov R.A. Decompensated (compromised) dentition (philosophical essay). — Parodontologiya. — 2020; 25 (2): 134—9 (In Russ).
  3. Rozov R.A., Trezubov V.N., Liddelow G. Clinical and radiographic classification of implant supported prosthesis for edentulous patients. — Parodontologiya. — 2019; 24 (2): 115—l8. eLIBRARY ID: 39195261
  4. Kochurova E.V., Nikolenko V.N., Kudasova E.O. Peculiarities of cerebral cortex synthetic activity at determination of adaptive ability in patients with completely absent dentition. — Medical News of North Caucasus. — 2019; 14 (2): 356—9. DOI: 10.14300/mnnc.2019.14087
  5. Orjonikidze R., Orjonikidze Z., Shirokov L., Arutyunov S.D. Non-removable denture prototypes, effective in dental implantation. — Georgian Medical News. — 2018; 1 (274): 31—6. PMID: 29461223
  6. Brozović J., Demoli N., Farkaš N., Sušić M., Alar Z., Gabrić Pandurić D. Properties of axially loaded implant-abutment assemblies using digital holographic interferometry analysis. — Dent Mater. — 2014; 30 (3): 17—27. PMID: 24411994
  7. Rozov R.A. Method of producing implantation impression in creating extended structures. — Patent RU № 2683907, effective from 25.07.2018 (In Russ.).
  8. Misch C., Perel M., Wang H. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. — Implant Dent. — 2008; 17 (1): 5—15. PMID: 18332753
  9. Sasaki M., Chubachi S., Kameyama N. Effects of long-term cigarette smoke exposure on bone metabolism, structure, and quality in a mouse model of emphysema. — PLoS One. — 2018; 13 (1): e0191611. PMID: 29381718
  10. Kuroshima S., Kaku M., Ishimoto T., Sasaki M., Nakano T., Sawase T. A paradigm shift for bone quality in dentistry: A literature review. — J Prosthodont Res. — 2017; 61 (4): 353—62. PMID: 28633987
  11. Uto Y., Kuroshima S., Nakano T. et al. Effects of mechanical repetitive load on bone quality around implants in rat maxillae. — PLoS One. — 2017; 12 (12): e0189893. PMID: 29244883
  12. Marković A., Mišić T., Miličić B., Calvo-Guirado J.L., Aleksić Z., Ðinić A. Heat generation during implant placement in low-density bone: effect of surgical technique, insertion torque and implant macro design. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2013; 24 (7): 798—805. PMID: 22469169
  13. Marković A., Calvo-Guirado J.L., Lazić Z., Gómez-Moreno G. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12-week clinical study. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2013; 15 (3): 341—9. PMID: 22171668
  14. Stocchero M., Toia M., Cecchinato D., Becktor J.P., Coelho P.G., Jimbo R. Biomechanical, Biologic, and Clinical Outcomes of Undersized Implant Surgical Preparation: A Systematic Review. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2016; 31 (6): 1247—63. PMID: 27861649
  15. Wentaschek S., Hartmann S., Walter C., Wagner W. Six-implant-supported immediate fixed rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous maxillae with tilted distal implants. — Int J Implant Dent. — 2017; 3 (1): 35. PMID: 28744757
  16. Albrektsson T., Jemt T., Mölne J., Tengvall P., Wennerberg A. On inflammation-immunological balance theory — A critical apprehension of disease concepts around implants: Mucositis and marginal bone loss may represent normal conditions and not necessarily a state of disease. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2019; 21 (1): 183—9. PMID: 30592373
  17. Rozov R.A., Trezubov V.V., Kusevitskij L.J., Gusev A.V. Method of prosthodontic treatment. — Patent RU № 2474401, effective from 30.06.2011 (In Russ.).
  18. Maló P., de Araújo Nobre M., Lopes A., Ferro A., Botto J. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2019; 21 (4): 565—77. PMID: 30924309
  19. Papaspyridakos P., Chen C.J., Chuang S.K., Weber H.P. Implant loading protocols for edentulous patients with fixed prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2014; 29: 256—70. PMID: 24660202
  20. Rozov R.A., Trezubov V.N., Urakov A.L., Azarin G.S. Criterion assessment system of the actual level of expertise of dental professionals practicing implant dentistry. — Stomatology. — 2019; 3: 4—11 (In Russ.).
  21. Maló P., Lopes A., de Araújo Nobre M., Ferro A. Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30N·cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the All-on-4 concept: retrospective study. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. — 2018; 47 (8): 1079—85. PMID: 29735198

Published on

January 13, 2021