DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_4_6

The microbiota of carious dentin during the treatment of teeth with burs of various grain sizes

Authors

  • M.D. Zhavoronkova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Therapeutic dentistry and periodontology Department
  • T.N. Suborova 2, PhD in Biological Sciences, associate professor, senior researcher
  • L.Yu. Orekhova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Dental therapeutics and periodontology Department
  • A.G. Platonova 3, laboratory assistant
  • N.S. Oksas 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Therapeutic dentistry and periodontology Department
  • 1 Pavlov University, 197022, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • 2 Military Medical Academy, 191015, St. Petersburg, Russia
  • 3 “MedBasis” LLC, 190013, St. Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Purpose — the study of the qualitative and quantitative composition of dentin microorganisms in the process of preparing a deep caries cavity with burs of various grain sizes. Materials and methods. In the process of processing a deep carious cavity with burs of various grain sizes, 21 samples of dentin were obtained and studied by chromatography-mass spectrometry of microbial markers. Results. The study of the separated carious cavities by the method of chromatography-mass spectrometry of microbial markers made it possible to detect the presence in high content of at least 16 of the 58 studied species and genera of microorganisms and to determine the state of the microecological status of the samples. Microbial markers of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, viruses and micromycetes were identified. Typical caries pathogens Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus epidermidis were found in almost all samples. In addition, micromycetes, Clostridium perfringens, Ruminococcus spp., Lactobacillus spp. Were widespread and other microorganisms that are not characteristic of the spectrum of caries pathogens. The results were compared with the normal values for the nasopharynx biotope and revealed an excess of indicators for a number of parameters. No significant differences were found in the study of microbial communities involved in the development of caries in the treatment of teeth with burs of different grain sizes. Conclusions. According to the data obtained by gas chromatography — mass spectrometry, the microbiocenosis of the separated carious cavity includes a wide range of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and fungi. The use of modern technologies for the identification of pathogens will make it possible in the future to increase the effectiveness of the treatment of dental diseases and reduce the cost of re-treatment.

Key words:

dental diseases, diamond burs with different grain, carios microorganisms, microbial markers, gas chromatography — mass spectrometry

For Citation

[1]
Zhavoronkova M.D., Suborova T.N., Orekhova L.Yu., Platonova A.G., Oksas N.S. The microbiota of carious dentin during the treatment of teeth with burs of various grain sizes. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 4 (96): 6—13. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_4_6

Introduction

The prevention and treatment of dental diseases is of crucial importance because of their high prevalence, complex diagnostics and detrimental effect on human health [1—3]. A number of factors should be taken into account when choosing a method for deep caries treatment, viz. the presence of microbial associations in the tooth decay cavity, dentinal tubules and pulp, as well as the structural changes in the dental pulp tissue [4—8]. Clinical studies have established that dental manipulations, medications and the exposure of a tooth to various types of radiation or critical temperatures cause a reaction of the tooth pulp [9—11].

Tooth preparation is an integral stage of dental therapy, the efficacy of which is the key to the successful treatment of caries, which necessitates the constant improvement of the odontotrypy techniques and instruments. That said, mechanical pre-treatment remains the most widely used and efficient method in caries therapy [12—14].

The key factor of the successful deep caries therapy is preventing any infectious or traumatic inflammatory processes in the dental pulp. Dental ivory traumas during the preparation process, or open dentinal canals serve as the paths through which microorganisms can easily penetrate under pressure during cavity preparation. It is a known fact that though not all microorganisms are mobile, they can move along the dentinal canals by means of recurring cytokinesis and under pressure during meals [15—17]. To date, various methods of hard dental tissue preparation are used in dental practice [18—20].

In case of a deep or acute process, it is a good practice to remove dentin in carious cavities with steel burs, SmartPrep burs or an excavator [21, 22]. A lot of research has been done on the nature of the change in the dentin structure during the preparation, which is reflected in domestic and foreign publications. The results of the application of particular methods and instrument types are studied by microscopic examinations [23—26].

Thus, according to the findings of a scanning electronic microscopic study, the use of burs with supercoarse and coarse grains of diamond coating for the preparation of carious cavities leads to dentin destruction with the formation of many dentin fragments and a smear layer. Dentin preparation with fine-gain diamond coating burs results in the formation of a small amount of a dense smear layer. The use of burs with the regular grain size of diamond coating for the dentin preparation causes the formation of an inapparent smear layer [27, 28]. Despite the use of state-of-the-art techniques and materials in caries treatment, the hard tooth tissues may remain infected after the carious cavity preparation [29—31]. Diseases of hard tooth tissues are most probably caused by multispecies microbiocenoses [32], therefore, the improvement of the deep caries treatment methods and the methods for detecting and identifying the causative agents of dental disorders is very important today [33—36]. It was of interest to study the dentin microflora in various areas of a carious cavity in the process of preparing a tooth for restoration with burs of various grain sizes, using a new technology, the method of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS).

Objectives: to study the components and the count of the dentin microflora of a carious cavity and its changes in the process of preparation with burs of various grain sizes.

Materials and methods

Seven apparently healthy patients aged 20 to 30 were selected for the clinical study. Basic and secondary methods of study were used during the examination: survey, examination, probing, thermometry, percussion, radiography and electroodontometry. The oral health status was assessed using the Greene—Vermillion OH1-S index as satisfactory. Then, on the basis of biased and unbiased examination methods, the first molars of the upper jaw with diagnosed chronic deep caries (I.G. Lukomsky's zonal classification) of class 1 according to Black (ICD-K02.1) were selected. The dental treatment and material sampling took place on the basis of the Department of Dental Therapy and Periodontology of the Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University with informed consent of patients. The beginning of the therapy involved professional oral hygiene treatment of the patient, anesthesia and rubber dam imposition to exclude the ingress of oral microflora into the sample. The carious cavity was drilled out using an air-turbine handpiece with mandatory water cooling. This included three stages: opening the cavity, necrotomy, and forming the walls and the floor of the carious cavity. A visual and tactile assessment of the removed material quality was used. After the microbiological test sampling, all dental cavities were treated with a 0.2% chlorhexidine antiseptic solution and restored with a filling composite.

Sampling for the assessment of the dentin microflora components and count was carried out using a sterile dental plier and sterile foam swabs (PeleTim No. 1, Voco). A swab was placed in a sterile test tube and delivered to the laboratory on the same day. Twenty-one swabbed samples were taken from the dentin surface. The material under study was sampled at three stages of the preparation: first, from the surface of the untreated softened dentin after the carious cavity had been opened with a sterile diamond bur of the regular grain size (ISO 524). Then the material was sampled after necrotomy performed with a sterile fine-grain diamond bur (ISO 524), and then after the formation of the walls and the floor of the cavity, for which purpose a sterile ultra-fine grain diamond bur (ISO 504) was used. The characteristics of the burs used for the preparation of carious cavities are given in Table 1.

Table 1. Characteristics of the burs used for the preparation of carious cavities
Bur color Average grain size, μm Grain size category ISO
Blue 105—125 Regular 524
Red 30—60 Thin 514
Yellow 10—30 Ultra-fine 504

Swabbed samples from the dentin surface were examined by the GCMS method using the 7820N—5975 Agilent Technologies (USA) system at the Microbial Chromatography Laboratory, Medbazis LLC (St. Petersburg, Russia). The χ2 test was used to compare the signs detection rate, and the Mann—Whitney test to compare the absolute values.

Results and discussion

The GCMS method [37] makes it possible to detect the quality and quantity of the microbial markers content of more than 50 species and genera of bacteria, micromycetes and viruses in the sample under study, and the results of measuring the concentrations of microbial markers in blood with the subsequent reconstruction of the microbial community make it possible to determine the microecological status, as well as the composition of the mixed infection in the lesion focus. In accordance with the developed statistical test for counting the findings of the GCMS method described in the literature, it was assumed that an abnormality becomes clinically significant when the microbial count doubles or halves [38]. As there were no data on the normal values of the content of microbial markers in the studied carious cavities, the content of microbial markers in the nasopharynx biotope, provided by Medbazis LLC, was taken as the normal value. The results of measuring microbial markers by the GCMS analysis of 21 swabbed samples from the dentin surface of carious cavities have made it possible to determine changes in the microecological status: when comparing the findings obtained with the normal values for the nasopharynx biotope, above-limit values were found for some of the parameters (Table 2).

Table 2. Microbial count in swabbed samples from the dentin surface of a carious tooth cavity (n=21) as compared with the normal values of the nasopharynx biotope
Microorganism Normal value of the nasopharynx biotope, ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial Microbial count in swabbed samples from a carious tooth cavity, ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial p
Streptococcus spp. 57±35 18404±9891 <0.01
Herpes simplex 730±704 8676±10009 <0.01
Streptococcus mutans 1038±369 5213±6504 <0.05
Micromycetes spp. 1392±1328 3444±3268 >0.05
Clostridium perfringens 238±166 2748±6629 <0.01
Staphylococcus spp. 401±360 1628±1652 <0.05
Epstein-Barr virus 167±85 1381±2984 <0.01
Staphylococcus epidermidis 28±14 1163±793 <0.01
Ruminococcus spp. 370±184 835±992 >0.05
Clostridium difficile 204±85 787±1011 >0.05
Nocardia spp. 60±44 461±1470 <0.05
Coryneform CDC group XX 91±41 292±503 >0.05
Streptococcus pneumoniae 70±38 230±791 >0.05
Propionibacterium acnes 41±25 220±619 <0.05
Alcaligenes spp. 43±31 181±206 <0.05
Moraxella spp. 35±22 77±352 >0.05

It can be noted that as a result of the study of microbial markers and the reconstruction of the microbial community in the studied samples of the carious cavity in the highest concentration, typical causative agents of caries, Streptococci, were detected. The Staphylococcus, Nocardia and Alcaligenes concentrations were also 4 to 6 times higher than the normal value. Besides, the above-limit values of the Epstein—Barr and Herpes simplex viruses counts call attention to themselves. Markers of anaerobic microorganisms — Clostridia bacilli, a part of the normal intestinal microbiota of the human body, — were identified. The leading representative of the genus was C. perfringens, which is capable of forming more than ten varieties of toxins, whose targets are biological membranes in tissues.

It was of interest to compare the presence of microorganisms at various levels of preparing the carious cavity for restoration. It was established that the detection rate of the dominating causative agents of caries did not change when the cavity was prepared with burs of different grain sizes. Thus, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococci in general were detected in all samples under study. The microbial marker isolation rate of fungi, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Clostridium perfringens, Ruminococcus spp. and other microorganisms decreased insignificantly or fluctuated within various limits, which did not allow revealing any significant differences, with the exception of Alcaligenes spp., Clostridium coccoides and Propionibacterium freudenreichii, which are not considered clinically significant in dentistry. Possibly, this is accounted for by the fact that not so many samples were taken and requires further research (Table 3).

Table 3. Microbial marker detection rate in swabbed samples from the dentin surface of a carious tooth cavity at different stages of preparation with burs of different grain sizes

Microorganism

Microbial marker detection rate

after the opening of the carious cavity (n=7) after necrotomy (n=7) after the formation of the walls and floor of the cavity (n=7) χ2 p
Streptococcus mutans 7 7 7 0.000 >0.05
Micromycetes spp. 7 7 7 0.000 >0.05
Streptococcus spp. 6 7 7 0.053 >0.05
Staphylococcus epidermidis 7 5 5 0.248 >0.05
Clostridium perfringens 7 4 5 0.485 >0.05
Ruminococcus spp. 5 4 5 0.088 >0.05
Lactobacillus spp. 3 6 4 0.649 >0.05
Herpes simplex 4 6 3 0.649 >0.05
Staphylococcus spp. 5 4 3 0.321 >0.05
Alcaligenes spp. 5 4 2 0.891 <0.05
Clostridium difficile 4 4 2 0.585 >0.05
Nocardia asteroides 2 4 4 0.585 >0.05
Clostridium coccoides 4 2 2 0.684 <0.05
Eubacterium spp. 3 2 3 0.188 >0.05
Propionibacterium freudenreichii 5 2 1 2.232 <0.05
Streptomyces spp. 2 3 3 0.188 >0.05
Bifidobacterium spp. 3 2 2 0.207 >0.05
Corineform CDC-group XX 3 2 2 0.207 >0.05
Candida spp. 3 2 2 0.207 >0.05

The comparison of quantitative values did not allow to draw a conclusion as to any advantage of using burs of various grain sizes at different levels of cavity preparation, either. A marked decrease in the value was detected only for certain microorganisms, whose role in caries development was not established. Thus, the Nocardia, Prevotella and Propionibacterium genera were found only in the samples obtained after the opening of the carious cavity. There was a decrease in the Propionibacterium freudenreichii count from 3214±3232×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial after the opening of the carious cavity to 591±1011×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial after necrotomy and to ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial after the formation of the walls and the floor of the cavity (Table 4).

Table 4. Microbial count in swabbed samples from the dentin surface of a carious tooth cavity at different stages of preparation with burs of different grain sizes

Microorganism

Microbial count in swabbed samples from the dentin surface of a carious tooth cavity

after the opening of the carious cavity, ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial (n=7) after necrotomy, ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial (n=7) after the formation of the walls and the floor of the cavity, ×105 CFM/g of the biomaterial (n=7) p
Streptococcus spp. 16693±12615 18060±9815 20458±7884 >0.05
Herpes simplex 6052±5920 15736±13008 4240±6365 >0.05
Micromycetes spp. 6002±2479 8415±3954 5438±2641 >0.05
Streptococcus mutans 5882±6158 6224±8327 3534±5362 >0.05
Propionibacterium freudenreichii 3214±3232 591±1011 308±816 <0.01
Lactobacillus spp. 2589±3487 2723±2033 1075±1539 >0.05
Epstein—Barr virus 2351±4042 733±1940 1060±2805 >0.05
Staphylococcus spp. 2165±1920 1489±1583 1230±1536 >0.05
Eubacterium spp. 1409±2213 817±1457 5049±12223 <0.05
Staphylococcus epidermidis 1301±741 1020±888 1167±845 >0.05
Bifidobacterium spp. 1188±1853 372±762 614±1070 >0.05
Clostridium difficile 1042±1025 977±1273 343±622 <0.05
Clostridium perfringens 945±863 4519±10950 2780±4286 <0.01
Propionibacterium spp. 896±2370 0 0 <0.01
Ruminococcus spp. 743±750 856±1063 906±1252 >0.05
Clostridium coccoides 652±738 207±505 993±2144 >0.05
Nocardia spp. 602±1592 0 0 <0.01
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius 477±1037 21±46 605±1590 >0.05
Prevotella spp. 341±780 0 0 <0.01
Candida spp. 224±423 445±760 447±793 >0.05
Aspergillus spp. 208±429 1007±1769 71±187 >0.05

At this stage, a high concentration presence of at least 16 out of 58 studied species and genera of microorganisms was detected. The typical causative agents of caries (Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus mutans) prevailed among them, with an occasional occurrence of micromycetes, viruses and anaerobic bacteria. At the same time, no significant differences have been found in the isolation rate or the count of the typical pathogens of the infectious inflammatory process in the samples obtained from a carious tooth cavity at various boring levels using burs of different grain sizes.

Conclusions

  1. During the study of samples swabbed from the dentin surface of a carious cavity by the GCMS method, a high concentration presence of at least 16 out of 58 studied species and genera of microorganisms was detected. The typical causative agents of caries (Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus mutans) prevailed among them, with an occasional occurrence of micromycetes, viruses and anaerobic bacteria. When comparing these findings with the nasopharynx biotope data taken as the reference values, a significant (3 to 10-fold) predominance of the leading pathogens in the studied samples was revealed.
  2. According to the findings of the GCMS analysis, the microbiocenosis of the swabbed samples from the dentin surface of a carious cavity included a wide range of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, and fungi. Such typical causative agents of caries as Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus epidermidis were found in almost all samples. Besides, micromycetes, Clostridium perfringens, Ruminococcus spp. and Lactobacillus spp. were well represented, as well as other microorganisms uncharacteristic of the range of caries causative agents.
  3. In the process of preparing the carious cavity with burs of different grain sizes, a marked decrease was found only for some of the microorganisms, whose role in the development of caries has not been established. Thus, the Nocardia, Prevotella and Propionibacterium genera were found only in the samples obtained after the opening of a carious cavity. The count of Propionibacterium freudenreichii decreased from 3214±3232 cells/g × 10⁵ after the opening of the carious cavity to 591±1011 cells/g × 10⁵ after necrotomy and to 308±816 cells/g × 10⁵ after the formation of the cavity walls and floor.
  4. Further research is required to determine the role of the GCMS method in studying the microbiocenosis of the carious cavity.

Thus, according to the findings of the GCMS study, it can be assumed that the range of possible causative agents of caries in the samples examined by us included well-studied pathogens, on the one hand, and anaerobic bacteria, viruses and fungi, on the other. In general, the GCMS study of the content of the carious cavity revealed in the material both typical causative agents of the infectious and inflammatory process in the tooth and other microorganisms whose role in the development of the disease has not been established. At the same time, it cannot be ruled out that the lipid components — microbial markers — found in the samples studied could belong to dead microorganisms of the intestinal and skin microflora, including viruses and micromycetes, and only specific markers, the concentration of which was proportional to the microbial count in the human body, penetrated into the lesion focus [39].

References

  1. Orekhova L.Yu. Periodontal disease. — St. Pb, 2004: 432. (In Russ.).
  2. Cepov L.M., Nikolaev A.I. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of periodontal diseases. — M.: MEDpress-inform, 2008: 272. (In Russ.).
  3. Sokolovich N.A., Klimova E.A., Ponomareva K.G., Polyakova E.A., Brodina T.V. The study of microbiological and biochemical changes in the oral cavity after caries therapy. — Medical Alliance. — 2017; 2: 74—79 (In Russ.).
  4. Parilov V.V., Shevchenko D.P., Ermak E.Yu. et al. Features of the reaction of tooth pulp to dosed preparation. — In: Proceedings of “Actual problems of dentistry” conference. — Chita, 1998. P. 101 (In Russ.).
  5. Vavilova T.P., Ostrovskaya I.G. Biochemistry and physiology of tooth pulp. — Moscow: MediaSphere, 2008. — P. 136 (In Russ.).
  6. Parazyan L.A. Features of regeneration and treatment of tooth pulp pathology with partial or complete preservation of its viability (experimental study): master’s thesis. — Volgograd, 2017. — 180 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Sirak S.V., Vafiadi M.Yu., Neminushchaya E.G., Kopylova I.A. Morphological features of blood supply and innervation of tooth pulp during caries of enamel and dentin. — Med. Bul. North Caucasus. — 2018; 1 (1): 93—6 (In Russ.).
  8. Faustova M.O., Ananieva M.M., Basarab Y.O. et al. Bacterial factors of cariogenicity (literature review). — Wiad. Lek. — 2018; 71 (2): 378—82.
  9. Moroz B.T., Ignatov Yu.D., Kalinin V.I. Thresholds of electroexcitation of pulp of various group softeeth and their changes under the influence of dipyrone, amidopyrine and diazepam. — Dentistry. — 1989; 5 (68): 30—2 (In Russ.).
  10. Malakhov A.V. Clinical and laboratory justification fortheuse of glass-ionomercushioning materials in the treatment of dental dentin caries: master’s thesis. — M., 2008: 110 (In Russ.).
  11. Shamkhalov D.I. The reaction of pulp vessels to the preparation of teeth with orthopedic treatment: Dis. abstract. — M., 2013: 110 (In Russ.).
  12. Elin V.A. Optimization of technologies for preparing hard tooth tissues for restoration: author: master’s thesis. — Samara, 2004. — 25 p. (In Russ.).
  13. Butvilovskij A.V., Volodkevich D.L., Volodkevich A.L., Galiakberov E.R. A comparative analysis of the degree of preservation of hard tooth tissues during preparation with various burs. — In comped. “BSMU at the forefront of medical science and practice”. — Minsk, 2017. — Pp. 130—132 (In Russ.).
  14. Iroshnikova E.S., Timofeeva-Kol‘cova T.P. Safe modes of preparation of teeth. — In proceedings of “Odontopreparation” scientific conference. — Moscow., 2003. — Pp. 33—35 (In Russ.).
  15. Lysak V.V. (ed.) Microbiology: textbook. — Minsk, 2007. (In Russ.).
  16. Koen S., Berns R. Endodontics. — St. Louis—Toronto, 1987; St. Petersburg: Interline – 2000: 583—92 (In Russ.).
  17. Kazakova L.N., Vlasova S.P., Lebedeva S.N., Babadzhanyan S.G. Changes in the microbiological composition of demineralized dentin in the bottom of the carious cavity during the treatment of deep caries in children. — Saratov J. Med. Scientific Research. — 2013; 9 (3): 412—5 (In Russ.).
  18. Banerjee A., Kidd E.A., Watson T.F. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. — Caries Res. — 2000; 34: 144—50. DOI: 10.1159/000016582
  19. Ziskind D., Kupietzky A., Beyth N. First-choice treatment alternatives for caries removal using the chemomechanical method. — Quint Int. — 2005; 1 (36): 9—14.
  20. Hidirbegshvili O. A new concept for the preparation of cavities in operative dentistry. — New in dentistry. — 2002; 106 (6): 35—9 (In Russ.).
  21. Rumyancev V.A., Polunina O., Opeshko V., Moiseev D.A. Dental dentin nano-impregnation in experimental treatment of caries: assessment using electron microscopy. — Periodontology. — 2016; 3 (21): 68—71 (In Russ.).
  22. Yarova S.P., Zabolotnaya I.I. The chemical composition of dentin in teeth affected by cervical caries, depending on the depth of enamel microcracks. — Clinical Dentistry (Russia). — 2019; 1: 4—10 (In Russ.).
  23. Zolotareva O.V. Optimization of the preparation of hard tissues of teeth during caries with various rotary instruments: master’s thesis. — Moscow, 2007. — 23 p. (In Russ.).
  24. Sirak A.G., Sirak S.V. Dynamics of reparative dentinogenesis after treatment of deep caries and acute focal pulpitis with the developed multicomponent medical paste. — Fundamental Research. — 2013; 5 (2): 384—8 (In Russ.).
  25. Mihajlov D.G. Clinical and laboratory substantiation of the choice of the type of burs for the preparation of hard tissues of teeth: master’s thesis. — Moscow, 2011. — 21 p. (In Russ.).
  26. Mikhalsky K.S. Clinical and experimental rationale for the selection of burs and filling materials on an adhesive basis in the treatment of dental caries: master’s thesis. — Omsk, 2013. — 27 p. (In Russ.).
  27. Mishina N.S., Borozenceva V.A., Bolgov K.S. Clinical assessment of the quality of fissure filling using various methods of preparation. — Clinical Dentistry (Russia). — 2019; 4 (92): 8—10 (In Russ.).
  28. Borovskij E.V. Terminology and classification of dental caries and its complications. — Clinical Dentistry (Russia). — 2004; 1: 6—9 (In Russ.).
  29. Hrustyuk V.S., Knyazeva M.A. Improvement of the deep carious cavity disinfection method. — Dentist (Minsk). — 2014; 3 (14): 38—41 (In Russ.).
  30. Tec G.V., Smirnova E.I., Kardava K.M. et al. Little-known bacteriais olated from human diseases. — The scientific notes of the Pavlov University. — 2017; 24 (1): 35—9 (In Russ.).
  31. Klimova E.A., Sokolovich N.A., Brodina T.V. The microbiota of the oral cavity as a key to understanding the carious process, the status of the issue for 2016. — Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Medicine. — 2017; 1 (12): 54—9 (In Russ.).
  32. UluGüzel K.G., Kirzioğlu Z., Özkorucuklu S. Dentin permeability of carious primary teeth. Niger. — J Clin Pract. — 2017; 20 (12): 1566—70. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.196078
  33. Vladimirova M.D., Veselkov S.A. The influence of the method of finishing processing of composite restoration on the formation of plaque in a patient. — Student forum. — 2019: 9—12 (In Russ.).
  34. Makeeva I.M. Long-term results of restoration of anterior teeth with composite materials of light curing. — Dentistry. — 2002; 5: 41—4 (In Russ.).
  35. Osipov G.A., Fedosova N.F., Lyadov K.V. Quantitative in situ microbiological analysis of lipid markers in biological fluids using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. — Health and medical technology. — 2007; 5: 20—3 (In Russ.).
  36. Popov D.A., Ovseyenko S.T., Osipov G.A., Vostrikova T.Yu. The express mode of identification of agents of bacteriemias using the technique of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. — Clinical laboratory diagnostics. — 2013; 5: 54—8 (In Russ.).
  37. Zhavoronkova M.D., Suborova T.N., Orekhova L.Yu., Kuchumova E.D., Platonova A.G. Feasibility of microbial markers detection by chromato-mass-spectrometry in dentistry. Literature review. — Pediatric dentistry and dental profilaxis. — 2019; 19 (4): 64—71. DOI: 10.33925/1683-3031-2019-19-4-64-71

Published on

January 13, 2021