DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_2_85

Experience of application of orthodontic implants in patients who are in orthodontic treatment at the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department

Downloads

Authors

  • S.A. Vasilevsky 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • M.S. Serdyukov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Prosthodontics dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • O.V. Kovaleva 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics department
  • T.S. Stepanova 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • O.Yu. Kuzminskaya 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department
  • 1 Smolensk State Medical University, 214019, Smolensk, Russia

Abstract

Objective: improving the efficiency of orthodontic treatment using mini-screws as an additional support. Materials and methods. In this work, bio-RAY screws of various sizes were used, which were fixed in the sublateral crest (izc zone) on the upper jaw, in the area of the outer oblique line (buccal shelf (BS) zone) on the lower jaw and the anterior group of teeth. Results. The study found that in patients with mesial, distal occlusion, with deep incisor dentition disocclusion, the use of orthoimplants significantly increases the level and quality of orthodontic treatment, as it allows to achieve more stable results. Conclusion. Mini-screws as an additional support accelerate the process of moving the teeth, which significantly reduces the period of orthodontic treatment.

Key words:

anchorage, orthoimplants, orthodontic support, orthodontic treatment, tork

For Citation

[1]
Vasilevsky S.A., Serdyukov M.S., Kovaleva O.V., Stepanova T.S., Kuzminskaya O.Yu. Experience of application of orthodontic implants in patients who are in orthodontic treatment at the Pediatric dentistry and orthodontics Department. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 2 (94): 85—91. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_2_85

References

  1. Slabkovskaya A.B., Tebloeva N.K., Filippova V.S., Morozova N.V. Orthodontic preparation of the dentition for prosthetic treatment. — Orthodontics. — 2010; 1: 40—3 (In Russ.).
  2. Nanda R. Biomechanics and aesthetics in clinical orthodontics. — Moscow: Medpress-inform, 2009. — P. 207—223 (In Russ.).
  3. Kornyushina N.N., Ospanova G.B. Implants: support in orthodontics. — Orthodontics. — 2005; 4: 40—4 (In Russ.).
  4. Proffit W.R. Modern orthodontics. — Moscow: Medpress-inform, 2017. — P. 304—326 (In Russ.).
  5. Lee A.-Y., Kim Y.H. Comparison of movement of the upper dentition according to anchorage method: orthodontic mini-implant versus conventional anchorage reinforcement in Class I malocclusion. — ISRN Dent. — 2011; 2011: 321206. PMID: 21991465
  6. Chang J.Z.-C., Chen Y.-J., Tung Y.-Y., Chiang Y.-Y., Lai E.H.-H., Chen W.-P., Lin C.-P. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. — Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. — 2012; 141 (3): 279—88. PMID: 22381488
  7. Kanzaki R., Daimaruya T., Takahashi I., Mitani H., Sugawara J. Remodeling of alveolar bone crest after molar intrusion with skeletal anchorage system in dogs. — Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. — 2007; 131 (3): 343—51. PMID: 17346589
  8. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. — J Clin Orthod. — 1997; 31 (11): 763—7. PMID: 9511584
  9. Park H.-S., Jeong S.-H., Kwon O.-W. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. — Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. — 2006; 130 (1): 18—25. PMID: 16849067
  10. Tanaka E.M., Sato S. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth. — Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. — 2008; 134 (5): 602.e1—11. PMID: 18984389

Downloads

Published on

July 25, 2020