DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_94

Indicators of quality of life in patients with caries and periodontal diseases of different intensity and severity

Downloads

Authors

  • S.I. Samadova 1, 2, PhD candidate at the Prosthodontics Department; dentist
  • 1 Azerbaijan Medical University, AZ1012, Baku, Azerbaijan
  • 2 “Implant Art” Dental Clinic, AZ1065, Baku, Azerbaijan

Abstract

The aim is to evaluate indicators of life quality in patients with dental caries and periodontal diseases. Materials and methods. 200 people with dental caries and 200 with periodontal disease were examined. There were 45 people with low caries intensity (group I), 100 with a moderate (group II) and 55 people with high intensity (group III). Patients with periodontal diseases were divided into groups: group I included 95 patients with catarrhal gingivitis and mild periodontitis, group II — 68 patients with moderate periodontitis, group III — 37 patients with severe periodontitis. Quality of life indicators were studied using the Nottingham Health Profile. Results. In patients with a severe degree of periodontal disease, emotional reactions of 2 or more points occurred 1.8 times (p<0.05) more often than with caries. In patients with periodontal diseases, in comparison with patients with caries, the indicators “sleep” and “social isolation” with respect to the mark of more than 2 points were noted in 9.3 (p<0.001) and 2.6 (p<0.01), respectively times, the average score is 3.2 (p<0.001) and 2.1 (p<0.05) times more often, respectively. In 14.5% of patients with high intensity of caries, physical activity was characterized by 8 points, the same score was observed in 27.03% of patients with severe periodontitis (p<0.05). Conclusion. Periodontal disease had a more negative effect on QOL. The overall score above 30 in patients with a severe degree of periodontal disease was 6.7 times (p<0.001), and the average score was 2.2 times (p<0.05) higher than in case of caries.

Key words:

caries, periodontal disease, quality of life, Nottingham Questionnaire

For Citation

[1]
Samadova S.I. Indicators of quality of life in patients with caries and periodontal diseases of different intensity and severity. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 1 (93): 94—98. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_94

References

  1. Abaev Z.M., Berkutova I.S., Domashev D.I., Rekhviashvili B.A., Zorina O.A. Quality of life for patients with various forms of periodontitis. — Problems of social hygiene and the history of medicine. — 2012; 4: 33—5 (In Russ.).
  2. Averyanov S.V., Zubareva A.V. Assessment of the quality of life in patients with dentoalveolar anomalies. — Modern problems of science and education. — 2015; 4: 308 (In Russ.).
  3. Masood M., Masood Y., Saub R., Newton J.T. Need of minimal important difference for oral health-related quality of life measures. — J Public Health Dent. — 2014; 74 (1): 13—20.
  4. Sheng X., Xiao X., Song X., Qiao L., Zhang X., Zhong H. Correlation between oral health and quality of life among the elderly in Southwest China from 2013 to 2015. — Medicine (Baltimore). — 2018; 97 (21): e10777.
  5. Leontyev V.K., Makarova R.P., Kuznetsova L.I., Blokhina Y.S. Comparative characteristics of the quality of life assessment by dental profil patients. — Stomatology. — 2001; 6: 63—4 (In Russ.).
  6. Bernabé E., Marcenes W. Periodontal disease and quality of life in British adults. — J Clin Periodontol. — 2010; 37 (11): 968—72.
  7. Gasimov M.S. For a healthy lifestyle. — Baku, 2005: 26 (In Azerb.).
  8. Gasimov M.S. 100 years isn’t a limit. — Baku, 2010: 136 (In Azerb.).
  9. Aliyeva R.G. Processing the optimal development model of dental services for the children of the Azerbaijan Republic: Synopsis of thesis MD. — Moscow, 2001: 43 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Garayev Z.I., Panakhov N.A. Periodontal status in adolescents with dentoalveolar anomalies. — Azerbaijan Medical Journal. — 1997; 1: 140—4 (In Russ.).
  11. Barer G.M., Gurevich K.G., Smirnyagina V.V., Fabrikant E.G.Using dental measurements of quality of life. — Dentistry for everyone. — 2006; 2: 4—7 (In Russ.).
  12. Gazhva S.I, Gazhva Y.V, Guluev R.S. Quality of life of patients with oral diseases (literature review). — Modern problems of science and education. — 2012; 4: 1—9 (In Russ.).
  13. Crofts-Barnes N.P., Brough E., Wilson K.E., Beddis A.J., Girdler N.M. Anxiety and quality of life in phobic dental patients. — J Dent Res. — 2010; 89 (3): 302—6.
  14. Eke P.I., Jaramillo F., Thornton-Evans G.O., Borgnakke W.S. Dental visits among adult Hispanics—BRFSS 1999 and 2006. — J Public Health Dent. — 2011; 71 (3): 252—6.
  15. Cabral D.L., Laurentino G.E., Damascena C.G., Faria C.D., Melo P.G., Teixeira-Salmela L.F. Comparisons of the Nottingham Health Profile and the SF-36 health survey for the assessment of quality of life in individuals with chronic stroke. — Rev Bras Fisioter. — 2012; 16 (4): 301—8.
  16. British Dental Association. Oral healthcare for older people: 2020 vision. Check-up January 2012. —.
  17. Lorente S., Vives J., Viladrich C., Losilla J.M. Tools to assess the measurement properties of quality of life instruments: a meta-review protocol. — BMJ Open. — 2018; 8 (7): e022829.
  18. Faria C.D., Teixeira-Salmela L.F., Nascimento V.B., Costa A.P., Brito N.D., Rodrigues-De-Paula F. Comparisons between the Nottingham Health Profile and the Short Form-36 for assessing the quality of life of community-dwelling elderly. — Rev Bras Fisioter. — 2011; 15 (5): 399—405.
  19. Wiklund I. The Nottingham Health Profile—a measure of health-related quality of life. — Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. — 1990; 1: 15—8.

Downloads

Published on

April 1, 2020