DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_80

The effect of cleaning agents for removable prostheses from polyetheretherketone and other thermoplastic materials on the adhesion of representatives of pathogenic oral microflora in a comparative aspect in an in vitro experiment

Downloads

Authors

  • I.R. Volchkova 1, lecturer of the Prosthodontics Department
  • A.V. Yumashev 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Prosthodontics Department
  • V.Yu. Doroshina 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Therapeutic dentistry department
  • V.V. Borisov 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics department
  • 1 Sechenov University, 119435, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of various hygienic care products for removable dentures from various thermoplastic materials and acrylic plastics on the adhesion of microorganisms in a comparative aspect. For the research, we made 144 samples from polymer materials Dental D, Bio XS, Dentokeep PEEK, Vertex rapid simplified. We studied the adhesion index of microorganisms St. aureus, E. coli, Candida albicans to samples from these materials before and after treatment with various hygiene products: antibacterial liquid soap and Protefix, an active cleaner for dentures. 48 samples acted as a control group and were not placed in test-tubes with these antibacterial agents. As a result of the study, it was found that after processing the samples in antibacterial soap, a significant decrease in the adhesion index of all microorganisms was not observed (p=0.861 for E. coli; p=0.53 for St. aureus; p=0.848 for Candida albicans). As a result of processing the samples with a solution of the active cleaner Protefix, a significant decrease in this indicator was revealed for all samples of the studied materials. A slight decrease in the adhesion indices after processing the samples with antibacterial soap indicates its lack of effectiveness. On the contrary, a significant decrease in this indicator confirms the advantage of processing removable dentures with a solution of the active cleaner Protefix and allows us to recommend it as a cleaning and disinfectant to care for removable dentures.

Key words:

polyetheretherketone, thermoplastic materials, removable dentures, adhesion of microorganisms, dentistry

For Citation

[1]
Volchkova I.R., Yumashev A.V., Doroshina V.Yu., Borisov V.V. The effect of cleaning agents for removable prostheses from polyetheretherketone and other thermoplastic materials on the adhesion of representatives of pathogenic oral microflora in a comparative aspect in an in vitro experiment. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 1 (93): 80—84. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_80

References

  1. Avtandilov G.A. Biodegradation of dentures made of polymer materials (experimental study): PhD thesis. — Moscow, 2013. — 156 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Arutyunov C.D., Ippolitov E.V., Pivovarov A.A., Tsarev V.N. The relationship between the roughness and surface topography of a basic dental polymethylmethacrylate polymer and the formation of a microbial biofilm with different methods of polishing samples. — Kazan Medical Journal. — 2014; 2: 224—31 (In Russ.).
  3. Vagner V.D., Smirnova L.E., Saleev R.A., Bochkovskiy I.S., Vashurin I.V. Technologies for orthopedic treatment of dental patients. — Clinical Dentistry. — 2010; 1 (53): 12—5 (In Russ.).
  4. Volchkova I.R., Yumashev A.V., Utyuzh A.S., Doroshina V.Yu., Mikhaylova M.V. The use of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for removable dental prostheses: data review. — Clinical Dentistry. — 2018; 1 (85): 68—71 (In Russ.).
  5. Kalivradzhiyan E.S., Golubev N.A., Alabovskiy D.V., Burlutskaya S.I., Likhosherstov A.V., Rami Khamdan Ali Naser, Talalay M.A. Clinical and laboratory stages of manufacturing two-layer bases of prostheses and orthodontic appliances. — System analysis and management in biomedical systems. — 2004; 3 (1): 90—2 (In Russ.).
  6. Kovalenko O.I. Clinical and laboratory substantiation of the use of a basic plastic based on nylon: PhD thesis. — Moscow, 2011. — 112 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Marenkova M.V. Features of orthopedic treatment of patients with intolerance event of dentures on the background of microbial imbalance of the oral cavity: PhD thesis. — Yekaterinburg, 2007. — 143 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Ryzhova I.P., Prisnyy A.A., Shinkarenko N.N., Salivonchik M.S. The condition of the microflora of the oral cavity under the influence of removable dentures. — International Journal of Applied and Basic Research. — 2014; 2: 150—3 (In Russ.).
  9. Salivonchik M.S. Experimental and clinical substantiation of the effectiveness of the final processing of removable constructions of dentures from thermoplastic polymers: PhD thesis. — Voronezh, 2015. — 135 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Takhtarov M.V., Eremin O.V. Prevention in orthopedic dentistry. — Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. — 2011; 7(1): 331—2 (In Russ.).
  11. Utjuzh A.S., Jumashev A.V., Lushkov R.M. A clinical example of orthopedic treatment of a patient after resection of the lower jaw because of sarcoma using dental implants. — Clinical Dentistry. — 2016; 4 (80): 56—8 (In Russ.).
  12. Tsarev V.N., Ibragimov T.I., Trefilov A.G. Application of microbiological monitoring methods in the process of orthopedic treatment of patients with secondary full adentia. — Stomatologist. — 2008; 2: 45—51 (In Russ.).
  13. Tsarev V.N., Trefilov A.G., Kleymenova G.N., Levkin A.V. Spatial-temporal model of the formation of oral biofilms: the relationship of the processes of primary adhesion and microbial colonization. — Dental Forum. — 2011; 5: 126—31 (In Russ.).
  14. Aas J.A., Paster B.J., Stokes L.N., Olsen I., Dewhirst F.E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. — J Clin Microbiol. — 2005; 43 (11): 5721—32.
  15. Ali A.A., Alharbi F.A., Suresh C.S. Effectiveness of coating acrylic resin dentures on preventing Candida adhesion. — J Prosthodont. — 2013; 22 (6): 445—50.
  16. Bock R.M., Jones E.N., Ray D.A., Sonny Bal B., Pezzotti G., McEntire B.J. Bacteriostatic behavior of surface modulated silicon nitride in comparison to polyetheretherketone and titanium. — J Biomed Mater Res A. — 2017; 105 (5): 1521—34.
  17. Duyck J., Vandamme K., Krausch-Hofmann S., Boon L., De Keersmaecker K., Jalon E., Teughels W. Impact of denture cleaning method and overnight storage condition on denture biofilm mass and composition: a cross-over randomized clinical trial. — PLoS One. — 2016; 11 (1): e0145837.
  18. Hayran Y., Sarikaya I., Aydin A., Tekin Y.H. Determination of the effective anticandidal concentration of denture cleanser tablets on some denture base resins. — J Appl Oral Sci. — 2018; 26: e20170077.
  19. Kolenbrander P.E., Palmer R.J. Jr, Periasamy S., Jakubovics N.S. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance. — Nat Rev Microbiol. — 2010; 8 (7): 471—80.
  20. Kuramitsu H.K., He X., Lux R., Anderson M.H., Shi W. Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities. — Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. — 2007; 71 (4): 653—70.
  21. Sobolewska E., Fraczak B., Czarnomysy-Furowicz D., Ey-Chmielewska H., Karakulska J. Bacteria adhesion to the surface of various prosthetics materials. — Ann Acad Med Stetin. — 2007; 53 (2): 68—71.
  22. Study of oral microbial adhesion and biofilm formation on the surface of nano-fluorohydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composite]. — Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. — 2015; 50 (6): 378—82 [in Chinese.
  23. Young B., Jose A., Cameron D., McCord F., Murray C., Bagg J., Ramage G. Attachment of Candida albicans to denture base acrylic resin processed by three different methods. — Int J Prosthodont. — 2009; 22 (5): 488—9.

Downloads

Published on

April 1, 2020