DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2018_4_22

Experience of using the technique of preserving the volume of the alveolar bone by using a fragment of the removed tooth to close the alveolar socket in a patient with chronic apical periodontitis

Downloads

Authors

  • A.A. Kulakov 1, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor, director
  • V.A. Badaljan 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, senior researcher at the Clinical and experimental Implantology Department
  • A.A. Apojan 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division; dentistry surgeon
  • N.V. Elfimova 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • Z.M. Stepanjan 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Tooth extraction and subsequent intraosseous dental implantation are one of the most frequently performed procedure in surgical dentistry, resulting in there are natural processes of atrophy of the alveolar bone and surrounding tissue. A sufficient amount of soft and hard tissue is needed to achieve a good aesthetic result in dental implantation. That’s why the preservation of alveolar ridge parameters after tooth extraction is a relevant objective of surgical dentistry [6, 8].

Key words:

atrophy of bone, preservation of bone volume, socket preservation, dental implantation

For Citation

[1]
Kulakov A.A., Badaljan V.A., Apojan A.A., Elfimova N.V., Stepanjan Z.M. Experience of using the technique of preserving the volume of the alveolar bone by using a fragment of the removed tooth to close the alveolar socket in a patient with chronic apical periodontitis. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2018; 4 (88): 22—25. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2018_4_22

References

  1. Barone A., Ricci M., Tonelli P., Santini S., Covani U. Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2013; 24 (11): 1231-7.
  2. Bunyaratavej P., Wang H.L. Collagen membranes: a review. - J Periodontol. - 2001; 72 (2): 215-29.
  3. Camargo P.M., Lekovic V., Weinlaender M. et al. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. - Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. - 2000; 90 (5): 581-6.
  4. Chappuis V., Araújo M.G., Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. - Periodontol 2000. - 2017; 73 (1): 73-83.
  5. Choi H.K., Cho H.Y., Lee S.J., Cho I.W., Shin H.S., Koo K.T., Lim H.C., Park J.C. Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes. - J Periodontal Implant Sci. - 2017; 47 (6): 372-80.
  6. Kubilius M., Kubilius R., Gleiznys A. The preservation of alveolar bone ridge during tooth extraction. - Stomatologija. - 2012; 14 (1): 3-11.
  7. Maiorana C., Poli P.P., Deflorian M., Testori T., Mandelli F., Nagursky H., Vinci R. Alveolar socket preservation with demineralised bovine bone mineral and a collagen matrix. - J Periodontal Implant Sci. - 2017; 47 (4): 194-210.
  8. Manavella V., Romano F., Corano L., Bignardi C., Aimetti M. Three-dimensional volumetric changes in severely resorbed alveolar sockets after ridge augmentation with bovine-derived xenograft and resorbable barrier: a preliminary study on CBCT imaging. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2018; 33 (2): 373-82.
  9. Neumeyer S., Hopmann S., Stelsel M., Morig G., Gotz W., Hanfland L., Gosau M. A biologic treatment concept for the extraction alveoli: Replantation and extrusion of root segments. - Implantologie. - 2014; 22 (2): 149-58.
  10. Schropp L., Wenzel A., Kostopoulos L., Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. - Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. - 2003; 23 (4): 313-23.

Downloads

Published on

December 1, 2018