DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_2_30

Apical micro leakage evaluation using Reciproc and WaveOne files

Downloads

Authors

  • A.G. Alhelal 1, PhD in Conservative Dentistry, assistant professor of Conservative dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3031-1494
  • Q.A.M. Albayati 1, MSc in Conservative Dentistry, lecturer of Conservative dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-5198-7966
  • T.G.H. Al-Khafaji 1, PhD in Conservative Dentistry, lecturer of Conservative dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-4383-2918
  • 1 University of Babylon, 51002, Hilla, Iraq

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the apical seals of root canals prepared with WaveOne and Reciproc files utilizing either the rotary or reciprocating preparation techniques.
Materials and methods.
Sixty human single-rooted premolar (bicuspid) teeth were prepared and randomly divided into 4 groups which received different preparations: WaveOne files using rotary and reciprocating techniques and Reciproc files using rotary and reciprocating techniques. Single-cone technique was used for the obturation of the teeth, with zinc oxide eugenol sealer. The apical seals were evaluated using a dye penetration technique. The degree of micro leakage was assessed via measurement stereomicroscope (mag. 10x).
Results.
There is a significant difference between all groups in the extent of micro leakage (p<0.05). The mean value of WaveOne file reciprocation group (0.73 μm) is lower than that of WaveOne file rotation group (2.39 μm), and the mean value of Reciproc file reciprocation group (0.71 μm) is lower than that of Reciproc file rotation group (2.42 μm). There is a significant difference between the measurements for the groups with reciprocation movement and rotational movement (between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 3 and Group 4), at p<0.05.
Conclusion.
Using either WaveOne or Reciproc files, much lower apical micro leakage resulted when applying the reciprocation method compared to the rotary technique.

Key words:

dye, premolar, root canal preparation, root canal therapy, technique

For Citation

[1]
Alhelal A.G., Albayati Q.A.M., Al-Khafaji T.G.H. Apical micro leakage evaluation using Reciproc and WaveOne files. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (2): 30—34. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_2_30

References

  1. Moinuddin M.K., et al. Sealing ability comparison of three different obturating systems to intraradicular dentin — An in vitro stereomicroscopic study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024; 16 (Suppl 1): S733—S735. PMID: 38595555
  2. Tabassum S., et al. Nickel-titanium rotary file systems: What‘s new? —Eur Endod J. 2019; 4 (3): 111—117. PMID: 32161896
  3. Sudan P.S., et al. A Comparative evaluation of apical leakage using three root canal sealants: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19 (8): 955—958. PMID: 30150496
  4. Schmidt S., et al. Minimal dentinal tubule penetration of endodontic sealers in warm vertical compaction by direct detection via SEM analysis. J Clin Med. 2021; 10 (19): 4440. PMID: 34640456
  5. Bonzanini L.I.L., et al. Reciprocating and rotatory NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation of primary teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada. 2021; 21: e0016. DOI: 10.1590/pboci.2021.124
  6. Makanjuola J.O., Umesi D.C., Oderinu O.H. Treatment outcome of manual versus rotary techniques in single-visit endodontics for patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A randomized clinical trial. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2018; 8 (2): 44—75. PMID: 32551317
  7. Giraki M., Harapetian E., Rüttermann S., Gerhardt-Szep S. Shaping ability of rotary instrumentation techniques and their limitations in simulated root canals. Journal of Dental Problems and Solutions. 2019; 6 (2): 49—55. DOI: 10.17352/2394-8418.000073
  8. Khalil W.A., Abu-Haimed T.S. Evaluation of the defects in reciprocating and rotating nickel-titanium files used as a single file to prepare molar teeth. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2017; 63 (3): 2639—2649. DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.76221
  9. Alsilani R., Jadu F., Bogari D.F., Jan A.M., Alhazzazi T.Y. Single file reciprocating systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: Comparison of Reciproc and WaveOne. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016; 6 (5): 402—409. PMID: 27891305
  10. Çetinkaya İ., et al. Shaping ability of reciprocating single-file systems in simulated canals: Reciproc versus Reciproc Blue. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 1: 145—150. DOI: 10.17343/sdutfd.878545
  11. Çelik G., et al. A comparative study of root canal shaping using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary files in preclinical dental education. PeerJ. 2019; 7: e7419. PMID: 31489262
  12. Pandey P., Aggarwal H., Tikku A.P., Singh A., Bains R., Mishra S. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of gutta percha and Resilon as root canal filling materials- a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020; 10 (2): 220—226. PMID: 32489825
  13. Mobarak A., et al. Comparison of bacterial coronal leakage between different obturation materials (an in vitro study). Alexandria Dental Journal. 2015; 40 (1): 1—7. DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2015.56488
  14. Medeiros P.L., et al. Sealing ability of MTA, CPM, and MBPc as root-end filling materials: a bacterial leakage study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016; 24 (2): 148—52. PMID: 27119763
  15. Gupta M., Rao D., Hegde S. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage associated with three different compomer placement techniques in primary molars. Contemp Clin Dent. 2017; 8 (1): 48—52. PMID: 28566851
  16. Kelmendi T., et al. Comparison of sealing abilities among zinc oxide eugenol root-canal filling cement, antibacterial bioceramic paste, and epoxy resin, using Enterococcus faecalis as a microbial tracer. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2022; 28: e936319. PMID: 35771490
  17. Sarin A., et al. Effect of different obturation techniques on the prognosis of endodontic therapy: A retrospective comparative analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17 (7): 582—6. PMID: 27595726
  18. Radeva E., et al. Evaluation of the apical seal after post space preparation: in vitro study. Journal of IMAB. 2019; 25 (1): 2327—2331. DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2019251.2327
  19. Kadali N., Alla R.K., Guduri V., Av R., Mc S.S., Raju R.V. Mineral trioxide aggregate: an overview of composition, properties and clinical applications. International Journal of Dental Materials. 2020; 1: 11—18. DOI: 10.37983/IJDM.2020.2103
  20. Bartols A., Laux G., Walther W. Multiple-file vs. single-file endodontics in dental practice: a study in routine care. PeerJ. 2016; 4: e2765. PMID: 27957398
  21. Zhang C., Liu J., Liu L. The influence of ProTaper and WaveOne on apically extruded debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018; 21 (5): 474—480. PMID: 30294105
  22. Buurma H.A., Buurma B.J. The effect of smear layer on bacterial penetration through roots obturated using zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20 (1): 88. PMID: 32216774
  23. Roy M., et al. Evaluation of microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine as apical barriers in simulated young permanent teeth. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24 (1): 1100. PMID: 39285402
  24. Dobrzańska J., et al. What are the chances of resilon to dominate the market filling materials for endodontics?. Metals. 2021; 11: 1744. DOI: 10.3390/met11111744
  25. Zakrzewski W., et al. Nanomaterials Application in Endodontics. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14 (18): 5296. PMID: 34576522
  26. Faus-Llácer V., et al. Comparative analysis of root canal dentin removal capacity of two NiTi endodontic reciprocating systems for the root canal treatment of primary molar teeth. An in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2022; 11 (2): 338. PMID: 35054032
  27. Eliasz W., et al. Root canal transportation after root canal preparation with ProTaper Next, WaveOne Gold, and twisted files. J Clin Med. 2020; 9 (11): 3661. PMID: 33202555
  28. Rubio J., Zarzosa J.I., Pallarés A. A comparative study of shaping ability of four rotary systems. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2015; 49 (4): 285—93. PMID: 27688412
  29. Yoon H., et al. Fitness of gutta-percha cones in curved root canals prepared with reciprocating files correlated with tug-back sensation. J Endod. 2015; 41 (1): 102—5. PMID: 25447506
  30. Zupanc J., et al. New thermomechanically treated NiTi alloys — a review. Int Endod J. 2018; 51 (10): 1088—1103. PMID: 29574784

Downloads

Received

July 12, 2024

Accepted

April 13, 2025

Published on

July 5, 2025