DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_4_178

Biomimetic treatment of epitheses for the rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects

Downloads

Authors

  • S.A. Nikolaenko 1, 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor, director; executive officer
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7191-4665
  • A.A. Khalapyan 1, 2, dentist; specialist in epithetics
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5414-7217
  • L.A. Shapiro 3, associate professor of the Medical and biological physics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2969-511X
  • 1 Prof. Nikolayenko Clinic, 660127, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
  • 2 “Epitetics” Medical Production Center, 660127, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
  • 3 Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, 660022, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Abstract

Reconstruction of craniofacial defects remains challenging despite recent advances in surgical techniques. In many cases, maxillofacial prostheses provide effective rehabilitation of complex facial defects as an alternative to surgical reconstruction. The most commonly used materials in maxillofacial prosthetics are silicones, whose specific properties allow a properly fabricated prosthesis to closely mimic the structure and appearance of the lost organ. In combination with functional results, aesthetics play an important role in the patient's self-esteem, identity and social reintegration. Ensuring an acceptable match between the patient's skin colour and the epithesis is an important component of aesthetic success. The purpose of this study was to clinically evaluate the efficacy of the Pantone SkinTone Guide System for modelling patient skin colour in the prosthetic rehabilitation of midface defects.
Materials and methods.
Fifty subjects with defects of various localisations and aetiologies were rehabilitated with rigid silicone elastomer epithetics using CAD/CAM technology. Skin colour was measured using a Capsure RM200 portable colorimeter (X-Rite, USA). For the clinical analysis of the colour adaptation of the designs, patients were interviewed using a specially designed questionnaire.
Results.
All patients rated the quality of the manufactured epithesis positively. The quality of colour matching was rated excellent and good by 44 (88%) patients. Patients felt that the epitheses rarely (36%) or never (48%) attracted the attention of those around them. A clinical example illustrated the satisfactory condition of the epithesis and fixation elements, good colour matching of the epithesis with healthy tissue after 5 years of follow-up.
Conclusion.
Obtaining a high-quality prosthesis with high biocompatibility and biological stability properties in relation to the patient's living tissues leads to a significant improvement in the quality of life and social rehabilitation of patients with maxillofacial defects.

Key words:

epitheses, maxillofacial defects, rehabilitation, adhesive fixation, magnetic fixation, medical silicone, skin color

For Citation

[1]
Nikolaenko S.A., Khalapyan A.A., Shapiro L.A. Biomimetic treatment of epitheses for the rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2024; 26 (4): 178—182. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_4_178

References

  1. Rifkin W.J., David J.A., Plana N.M., Kantar R.S., Diaz-Siso J.R., Gelb B.E., Ceradini D.J., Rodriguez E.D. Achievements and challenges in facial transplantation. Ann Surg. 2018; 268 (2): 260—270. PMID: 29489486
  2. Kozlov V.A., Matchin A.A. Issues of rehabilitation for oral cavity cancer patients. The Dental Institute. 2014; 1 (62): 34—37 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 22133896
  3. Pustovaya I.V., Engibaryan M.A., Svetitskiy P.V., Aedinova I.V., Volkova V.L., Chertova N.A., Ulianova Yu.V., Bauzhadze M.V. Orthopedic treatment in cancer patients with maxillofacial pathology. South Russian Journal of Cancer. 2021; 2: 22—33 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 46162391
  4. Egorenkov V.V. Practical and theoretical issues of surgery in oncology. Practical Oncology. 2020; 2: 101—105 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 43844855
  5. Salazar-Gamarra R., Binasco S., Seelaus R., Dib L.L. Present and future of extraoral maxillofacial prosthodontics: Cancer rehabilitation. Front Oral Health. 2022; 3: 1003430. PMID: 36338571
  6. Slijepcevic A.A., Afshari A., Vitale A.E., Couch S.M., Jeanpierre L.M., Chi J.J. A contemporary review of the role of facial prostheses in complex facial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023; 151 (2): 288e-298e. PMID: 36696329
  7. Korfage A., Raghoebar G.M., Noorda W.D., Plaat B.E., Vissink A., Visser A. Recommendations for implant-retained nasal prostheses after ablative tumor surgery: Minimal surgical aftercare, high implant survival, and satisfied patients. Head Neck. 2016; 38 Suppl 1: E619—24. PMID: 25784187
  8. Arutyunov S.D., Leontiev V.K., Tsimbalistov A.V., Drobyshev A.Yu., Bardenshtein L.M., Kharazyan A.E., Raputa A.C., Tsarev V.N. Occupational risks in the rehabilitation of patients with acquired defects of the face and jaw (review of literature). Challenges in Modern Medicine. 2020; 2: 285—303 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 43950370
  9. Arutyunov S.D., Polyakov D.I., Muslov S.A., Kharazyan A.E., Stepanov A.G., Astashina N.B. Study of the quality of life of patients using the QL PAER specific questionnaire after prosthetic auricular reconstruction. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2021; 1 (97): 160—164 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44847645
  10. de Oliveira F.M., Salazar-Gamarra R., Öhman D., Nannmark U., Pecorari V., Dib L.L. Quality of life assessment of patients utilizing orbital implant-supported prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20 (4): 438—443. PMID: 29508545
  11. Dings J.P.J., Merkx M.A.W., de Clonie Maclennan-Naphausen M.T.P., van de Pol P., Maal T.J.J., Meijer G.J. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: A survey on the quality of life. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (5): 780—786. PMID: 30414646
  12. Yoshioka F., Ozawa S., Matsuoka A., Takebe J. Fabricating nasal prostheses using four-dimensional facial expression models. J Prosthodont Res. 2021; 65 (3): 379—386. PMID: 33028799
  13. Farook T.H., Jamayet N.B., Abdullah J.Y., Rajion Z.A., Alam M.K. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 121 (3): 268—277. PMID: 31610244
  14. Antonova I.N., Kalakutskii N.V., Veselova K.A., Kalakutskii I.N., Gromova N.V. Properties of materials for craniofacial prostheses. The Dental Institute. 2019; 1 (82): 94—97 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 39154490
  15. Buzayan M.M. Prosthetic management of mid-facial defect with magnet-retained silicone prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014; 38 (1): 62—7. PMID: 23625838
  16. Unkovskiy A., Spintzyk S., Brom J., Huettig F., Keutel C. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (2): 303—308. PMID: 29429837
  17. Gupta P., Deshpande S., Radke U., Ughade S., Sethuraman R. The color stability of maxillofacial silicones: A systematic review and meta analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021; 21 (2): 138—149. PMID: 33938863
  18. Kulkarni R.S., Nagda S.J. Colour stability of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: a review of the literature. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2014; 22 (3): 108—15. PMID: 25831712
  19. Griniari P., Polyzois G., Papadopoulos T. Color and structural changes of a maxillofacial elastomer: the effects of accelerated photoaging, disinfection and type of pigments. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015; 13 (2): e87—91. PMID: 26108429
  20. Farah A., Sherriff M., Coward T. Color stability of nonpigmented and pigmented maxillofacial silicone elastomer exposed to 3 different environments. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (3): 476—482. PMID: 29627205
  21. Babu A.S., Manju V., Gopal V.K. Effect of chemical disinfectants and accelerated aging on maxillofacial silicone elastomers: An In vitro Study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29 (1): 67—73. PMID: 29442090
  22. Rahman A.M., Jamayet N.B., Nizami M.M.U.I., Johari Y., Husein A., Alam M.K. Effect of aging and weathering on the physical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28 (1): 36—48. PMID: 30043482
  23. Bishal A.K., Wee A.G., Barão V.A.R., Yuan J.C., Landers R., Sukotjo C., Takoudis C.G. Color stability of maxillofacial prosthetic silicone functionalized with oxide nanocoating. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121 (3): 538—543. PMID: 30503151
  24. Sonnahalli N.K., Chowdhary R. Effect of nanoparticles on color stability and mechanical and biological properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomer: A systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20 (3): 244—254. PMID: 33223694
  25. Mohan A.S., V M., Babu A.S., N K.V. Effect of particle size of nano-oxides on color stability and mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34 (1): 54—60. PMID: 33570520
  26. Mehta S., Nandeeshwar D.B. A spectrophotometric analysis of extraoral aging conditions on the color stability of maxillofacial silicone. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17 (4): 355—360. PMID: 29249879
  27. Mahale H., Deshpande S., Radke U., Patil P.G. Opacifiers on color stability of maxillofacial silicone under aging and Indian weathering conditions: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 129 (5): 805—810. PMID: 34649721
  28. Prasetyono T.O.H., Miranda T., Sari M., Noviana H. Creating benchmark of color skin viability based on digital photograph using mini mobile medical photo studio prototype. J Surg Res. 2019; 235: 124—130. PMID: 30691785
  29. Hoffman A.F., Park J.J., Berman Z.P., Alfonso A.R., Diep G.K., Mills E., Wolfe E.M., Felsenheld J.H., Ramly E.P., Rodriguez E.D. Establishing a clinically applicable methodology for skin color matching in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8 (2): e2655. PMID: 32309098
  30. Nikolaenko S.A., Zubarev A.I., Shapiro L.A., Bit M., Fedorov Yu.V. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with acquired dento-facial defects with bonded epitheses. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2016; 4 (80): 42—45 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 27389669

Downloads

Received

August 16, 2023

Accepted

November 9, 2023

Published on

January 16, 2024