DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_3_52

Prevention and treatment of chronic odontogenic sinusitis by autotransplantation of the third molar in retention (clinical cases)

Authors

  • I.R. Ganzha 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics
    ORCID: 0000-0002-0563-717X
  • M.A. Postnikov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Therapeutic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-2232-8870
  • I.S. Ganzha 2, 4th year student
    ORCID: 0009-0008-5118-4598
  • 1 Samara State Medical University, 443001, Samara, Russia
  • 2 Medical University “REAVIZ”, 443099, Samara, Russian Federation

Abstract

Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis and sinonasal complications of dental treatment are a common problem that leads patients to dentists and/or otorhinolaryngologists. Elimination of the source of odontogenic infection is associated with the removal of the causal tooth and the formation of a junction with the maxillary sinus — perforation of the Schneider membrane. Autotransplantation of a tooth is a procedure that involves the removal of erupted or retinated tooth and its relocation to another place in the oral cavity of the same person. The aim of the study was to develop and introduce into clinical practice a method for the treatment of odontogenic perforated sinusitis by autotransplantation of the third molar, which is in a retinated state.
Materials and methods.
From 2020 to 2023, the treatment of sinonasal complications and/or odontogenic perforated sinusitis was carried out by autotransplantation of the retinated molar of the 3rd molar. The data of 22 clinical cases were processed and analyzed. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated. The results of a survey of patients on the severity of symptoms of odontogenic sinusitis were compared.
Results.
The result of this work was the creation of a “Method of plastic perforation of the maxillary sinus using autotransplantation of the third molar”, the implementation of which leads to a complete cure of maxillary odontogenic sinusitis and the closure of the oroantral message. The viability of the neurovascular bundle of an autotransplanted molar was demonstrated and evaluated in 20 clinical cases. The effectiveness of treatment is demonstrated by the results of comparing the survey of patients on the severity of symptoms of odontogenic sinusitis before treatment and 2 months after autotransplantation and demonstrates the elimination of symptoms of maxillary sinusitis, as well as improving the quality of life of patients. The data of dynamic clinical and X-ray diagnostic observation of patients 1.5, 6, 12 and 24 months after the interventions show the effectiveness of the developed method of treatment of sinonasal complications. The statistical significance of the decrease in symptoms was confirmed by the Wilcoxon test at p<0.005, p<0.001 and p<0.0001.
Conclusions.
Carrying out the “Method of plastic perforation of the maxillary sinus using autotransplantation of the third molar” treatment ensures the elimination of sinonasal complications of dental treatment, allow you to restore the continuity of the dentition and chewing efficiency. It is possible to avoid the use of allogeneic, xenogenic, synthetic and other foreign grafts to restore the integrity of the maxillary sinus. It is possible to avoid expensive restorative treatment using dental implants and large-scale bone and plastic manipulations. To successfully reproduce the method of treatment of chronic odontogenic sinusitis by autotransplantation of the third molar in retention, all the risks and benefits of the proposed method should be evaluated. It is recommended to use a personalized approach to the patient, taking into account the state of his somatic health and comorbidity data, as well as the patient’s attitude to this method of treatment.

Key words:

odontogenic sinusitis, sinonasal complications, autotransplantation, tooth retention, third molar, wisdom tooth, perforation, treatment of sinusitis

For Citation

[1]
Ganzha I.R., Postnikov M.A., Ganzha I.S. Prevention and treatment of chronic odontogenic sinusitis by autotransplantation of the third molar in retention (clinical cases). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2023; 26 (3): 52—59. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_3_52

References

  1. Guliuk A.G., Varzhapetian S.D. The dynamics of the appealability of patients, the peculiarities of the primary diagnostics and the tactics of the treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Bulletin of Dentistry. 2012; 2 (79): 81—89 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 23141840
  2. Yaremenko A.I., Matina V.N., Suslov D.N., Lysenko A.V. Chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: state of the art (a review). International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015; 10—5: 834—837 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 24302547
  3. Piskunov G.Z. Physiological and pathophysiological basis for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2018; 1: 23—28 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 32721451
  4. Shishkin A.A., Karakulova Yu.V. Vegetative disorders and serotonin of blood serum in the case of chronic rhinosinusitis polyposa. Medical Almanac. 2017; 5 (50): 108—110 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 30528830
  5. Rosenfeld R.M., Piccirillo J.F., Chandrasekhar S.S., Brook I., Kumar K.A., Kramper M., Orlandi R.R., Palmer J.N., Patel Z.M., Peters A., Walsh S.A., Corrigan M.D. Clinical practice guideline (update): Adult sinusitis executive summary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 152 (4): 598—609. PMID: 25833927
  6. Felisati G., Chiapasco M., Lozza P., Saibene A.M., Pipolo C., Zaniboni M., Biglioli F., Borloni R. Sinonasal complications resulting from dental treatment: outcome-oriented proposal of classification and surgical protocol. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013; 27 (4): e101—6. PMID: 23883801
  7. Aukštakalnis R., Simonavičiūtė R., Simuntis R. Treatment options for odontogenic maxillary sinusitis: a review. Stomatologija. 2018; 20 (1): 22—26. PMID: 29806655
  8. Chiapasco M., Felisati G., Maccari A., Borloni R., Gatti F., Di Leo F. The management of complications following displacement of oral implants in the paranasal sinuses: a multicenter clinical report and proposed treatment protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38 (12): 1273—8. PMID: 19781911
  9. Workman A.D., Granquist E.J., Adappa N.D. Odontogenic sinusitis: developments in diagnosis, microbiology, and treatment. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 26 (1): 27—33. PMID: 29084007
  10. Liu J.F., Brigitta X.L., Wang Y.J., Dai J.S., Ren Y.Y., Zhang Y., Li W., Wang N.Y. [Clinical characteristics of patients with odontogenic sinusitis underwent endoscopic sinus surgery]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021; 56 (8): 848—853 (In Chinese). PMID: 34521170
  11. Vidal F., Coutinho T.M., Carvalho Ferreira D., Souza R.C., Gonçalves L.S. Odontogenic sinusitis: a comprehensive review. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017; 75 (8): 623—633. PMID: 28877613
  12. Durnovo E.A., Homutinnikova N.E., Fedorichev A.O., Sopina A.J. A new method of complex treatment of chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis complicated by the presence of an oroantral fistula. Medical Almanac. 2021; 4 (69): 55—60 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 47689893
  13. Lebedev M.V., Abdullina Y.A., Mitrofanova N.N., Kerimova K.I. Comprehensive approach in treatment of patients with odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. University Proceedings. Volga region. Medical sciences. 2020; 3 (55): 21—31 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44190760
  14. Chiapasco M., Felisati G., et al. The treatment of sinusitis following maxillary sinus grafting with the association of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and an intra-oral approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (6): 623—9. PMID: 22404380
  15. Koshel V.I., Koshel I.V., Sirak S.V., Shchetinin E.V., Tsygan V.N. Odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Saint-Petersburg: SpecLit, 2019. Pp. 119—132 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 42362734
  16. De Corso E., Rigante M., Mele D.A., Settimi S., Penazzi D., Lajolo C., Cordaro M., Panfili M., Montuori C., Galli J., Paludetti G. Real-life experience in the management of sinonasal complications of dental disease or treatments. J Pers Med. 2022; 12 (12): 2078. PMID: 36556298
  17. Mattos J.L., Ferguson B.J., Lee S. Predictive factors in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for odontogenic sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016; 6 (7): 697—700. PMID: 27028710
  18. Dvoryanchikov V.V., Grebnev G.A., Balin V.V., Shafigullin A.V. Complex treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2019; 2 (90): 65—67 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 37749527
  19. Atala-Acevedo C., Abarca J., Martínez-Zapata M.J., Díaz J., Olate S., Zaror C. Success rate of autotransplantation of teeth with an open apex: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 75 (1): 35—50. PMID: 27725103
  20. Slivkin A.A., Fedotova E.A., Iordanishvili A.K., Guk V.A., Melnikov M.V. Autologous transplantation of wisdom teeth. Russian Military Medical Academy Reports. 2020; S3—5: 152—156 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44386318
  21. Ivashchenko A.V., Yablokov A.E., Antonyan Y.E., Nesterov A.M., Van’kov V.A., Geletin P.N. Dental autotransplantation as an alternative to conventional dental transplantation. Bulletin of Medical Institute “REAVIZ”: Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health. 2018; 5 (35): 94—100 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 36871903
  22. Yang S., Jung B.Y., Pang N.S. Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 23 (1): 87—98. PMID: 29525925
  23. Badalyan V.A., Zedgenidze A.M. Success factors for dental autotransplantation. Stomatology. 2020; 4: 81—85 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 43137894
  24. Martin K., Nathwani S., Bunyan R. Autotransplantation of teeth: an evidence-based approach. Br Dent J. 2018; 224 (11): 861—864. PMID: 29855592
  25. Almpani K., Papageorgiou S.N., Papadopoulos M.A. Autotransplantation of teeth in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19 (6): 1157—79. PMID: 25903060
  26. Badalyan K., Zedgenidze A. The influence of terms of pulp extirpation during tooth auto transplantation on resorption and ankylosis in adults. Journal of Dental Health and Oral Research. 2020; 1 (2): 1—12. DOI: 10.46889/JDHOR.2020.1301
  27. Mainkar A. A systematic review of the survival of teeth intentionally replanted with a modern technique and cost-effectiveness compared with single-tooth implants. J Endod. 2017; 43 (12): 1963—1968. PMID: 29061358
  28. Serikov V., Losev V., Bafanova K. Studying of factors affecting survivability of replanted permanent teeth in children after avulsion. Universum: Medicine and Pharmacology. 2019; 4 (59): 12—14 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 38187892
  29. Tsitsiashvili A.M., Panin A.M., Volosova E.V. The success of treatment and survival of dental implants in different approaches to the treatment of patients using dental implants in conditions of limited bone volume. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 1: 32—38 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 42605787

Received

April 26, 2023

Accepted

August 27, 2023

Published on

September 24, 2023