DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_48

History of dental implants evolution (literature review)

Authors

  • M.A. Postnikov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Therapeutic dentistry Department and Clinic
    ORCID: 0000-0002-2232-8870
  • A.A. Kiiko 2, general practice dentist
    ORCID: 0000-0002-4057-096X
  • A.M. Nesterov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-4187-4375
  • A.N. Nikolaenko 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Traumatology, orthopedics, and extreme surgery Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3411-4172
  • V.A. Kupryakhin 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Medical law and bioethics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-5017-9745
  • M.R. Sagirov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-2782-4689
  • 1 Samara State Medical University, 443001, Samara, Russia
  • 2 Dr. Postnikov Multidisciplinary Clinic, 443083, Samara, Russia

Abstract

A dental implant is a structure made of alloplastic materials and implanted into the tissues of the oral cavity to ensure the retention and support of a fixed or removable denture. Since the beginning of the XX century, dentists have increased their interest in dental implantation. To replace their own teeth, doctors tried to use various implant designs from most of the materials known at that time. However, the development of modern implant designs can be attributed to the second half of the XX century, or rather to the work of the founder of modern implantation, Professor Per-Ingvar Branemark from the University of Gothenburg (Sweden). From that moment on, dental implants began to be actively introduced into dentistry. To date, dental implantation is increasingly being used in practical dentistry. The use of dental implantation has allowed to expand the range of therapeutic measures, as well as to improve the quality of life of patients with hypodentia and oligodentia. An urgent task at all times has been to reduce complications during dental implantation by creating new implant systems, developing new surgical techniques, and using various methods to stimulate osseointegration. The main factors determining which system of intraosseous implants was chosen instead of another were: design, surface roughness, features of prosthetics, ease of insertion into the bone, cost, how successful they were over a certain period of time. This review presents a brief chronological sequence of the history of dental implants developed during the period from the beginning of the XX century to 2021. The achievements of dentists from all over the world who have made the most significant scientific and practical contribution to the development of implantology, as well as the most modern developments currently present in the dental market, are presented.

Key words:

dental implant, osseointegration, evolution, hypodentia

For Citation

[1]
Postnikov M.A., Kiiko A.A., Nesterov A.M., Nikolaenko A.N., Kupryakhin V.A., Sagirov M.R. History of dental implants evolution (literature review). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (1): 48—52. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_48

References

  1. Guglielmotti M.B., Olmedo D.G., Cabrini R.L. Research on implants and osseointegration. Periodontol 2000. 2019; 79 (1): 178—189. PMID: 30892769
  2. Mah C. The evolution of implants over the last fifty years. Aust Prosthodont J. 1990; 4: 47—52. PMID: 2096895
  3. Elani H.W., Starr J.R., Da Silva J.D., Gallucci G.O. Trends in dental implant use in the U.S., 1999—2016, and projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018; 97 (13): 1424—1430. PMID: 30075090
  4. Block M.S. Dental implants: The last 100 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 76 (1): 11—26. PMID: 29079267
  5. Paraskevich V.T. Dental implantation. Results of the century. New in dentistry. 2000; 8: 7—15 (In Russ.).
  6. Alghamdi H.S., Jansen J.A. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020; 39 (2): 167—172. PMID: 31969548
  7. Zhusev A.I., Remov A.Yu. Errors and success in dental implantation. Institute of Dentistry. 2002; 14 (1): 22—23 (In Russ.).
  8. Ivanov S.Yu., Bizyaev A.F., Lomakin M.V. Dental implantology. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2004. 293 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Ivanov S.Yu., Petrov I.Yu. Fundamentals of Dental Implantology. Study guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. Pp. 141—142 (In Russ.).
  10. Kashi A., Saha S. Evidence-based techniques to assess the performance of dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39 (6): 655—61. PMID: 21186959
  11. Greenberg A.M. Dental implants and evolving discipline. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2015; 27 (2): ix-x. PMID: 25951963
  12. Rodriguez A.E., Monzavi M., Yokoyama C.L., Nowzari H. Zirconia dental implants: A clinical and radiographic evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30 (6): 538—544. PMID: 30253041
  13. Kharitonov D.Yu., Kharitonov Yu.M., Kikov R.N., Surzhenko E.V. Estimation of the state of homeostasis in patients under anesthesia before dental implant surgery. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2019; 4 (92): 50—52 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41601784
  14. Abraham C.M. A brief historical perspective on dental implants, their surface coatings and treatments. Open Dent J. 2014; 8: 50—5. PMID: 24894638
  15. Vares E.Ya. I am against dental implantation. Why? Lvov, 1991. Pp. 50—51 (In Russ.).
  16. Kang M.H., Jung U.W., Cho K.S., Lee J.S. Retrospective radiographic observational study of 1692 Straumann tissue-level dental implants over 10 years. II. Marginal bone stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20 (5): 875—881. PMID: 30048038
  17. Buser D., Sennerby L., De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 7—21. PMID: 28000280
  18. Bosshardt D.D., Chappuis V., Buser D. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 22—40. PMID: 28000277
  19. Abt E., Carr A.B., Worthington H.V. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 2: CD003814. PMID: 22336794
  20. Rupp F., Liang L., Geis-Gerstorfer J., Scheideler L., Hüttig F. Surface characteristics of dental implants: A review. Dent Mater. 2018; 34 (1): 40—57. PMID: 29029850
  21. Aragoneses J.M., Aragoneses J., Brugal V.A., Gomez M., Suarez A. Relationship between implant length and implant stability of single-implant restorations: A 12-month follow-up clinical study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020; 56 (6): E263. PMID: 32471305
  22. Gallucci G.O., Hamilton A., Zhou W., Buser D., Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 16: 106—134. PMID: 30328194
  23. Prakash M., Audi K., Vaderhobli R.M. Long-term success of all-ceramic dental implants compared with titanium implants. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021; 31 (1): 73—89. PMID: 33822537
  24. Coelho P.G., Suzuki M., Marin C., Granato R., Gil L.F., Tovar N., Jimbo R., Neiva R., Bonfante E.A. Osseointegration of Plateau root form implants: Unique healing pathway leading to Haversian-Like long-term morphology. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015; 881: 111—28. PMID: 26545747
  25. Cionca N., Hashim D., Mombelli A. Zirconia dental implants: where are we now, and where are we heading? Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 241—258. PMID: 28000266
  26. Smeets R., Stadlinger B., Schwarz F., Beck-Broichsitter B., Jung O., Precht C., Kloss F., Gröbe A., Heiland M., Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 6285620. PMID: 27478833
  27. Missika P., Bessade J. [Dental implants]. Rev Prat. 2018; 68 (8): 827—830 (In French). PMID: 30869444
  28. Kubasiewicz-Ross P., Dominiak M., Gedrange T., Botzenhart U.U. Zirconium: The material of the future in modern implantology. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017; 26 (3): 533—537. PMID: 28791830
  29. Bankoğlu Güngör M., Aydın C., Yılmaz H., Gül E.B. An overview of zirconia dental implants: basic properties and clinical application of three cases. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40 (4): 485—94. PMID: 25106014
  30. Maiborodin I.V., Shevela A.A., Toder M.S., Shevela A.I. Current trends of the choice and processing of materials for dental implantation. Stomatology. 2018; 4: 68—76 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35691191
  31. Buser D., Sennerby L., De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 7-21. PMID: 28000280
  32. Roehling S., Schlegel K.A., Woelfler H., Gahlert M. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (5): 365—395. PMID: 30916812
  33. Samieirad S., Mianbandi V., Shiezadeh F., Hosseini-Abrishami M., Tohidi E. Tapered versus cylindrical implant: Which shape inflicts less pain after dental implant surgery? A clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (7): 1381—1388. PMID: 30902603
  34. Song S.Y., Lee J.Y., Shin S.W. Effect of implant diameter on fatigue strength. Implant Dent. 2017; 26 (1): 59—65. PMID: 27819849
  35. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants past and future, 1966—2042. J Can Dent Assoc. 2005; 71 (5): 327. PMID: 15949251
  36. Al-Meraikhi H., Yilmaz B., McGlumphy E., Brantley W.A., Johnston W.M. Distortion of CAD-CAM-fabricated implant-fixed titanium and zirconia complete dental prosthesis frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119 (1): 116—123. PMID: 28477917
  37. Özkurt Z., Kazazoğlu E. Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 37 (3): 367—76. PMID: 20545529
  38. Schoenbaum T.R., Guichet D.L., Jang J.Y., Kim Y.K., Wadhwani C.P.K. Clinician preferences for complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: A survey of the membership of the Pacific Coast Society for Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 124 (6): 699—705. PMID: 31959399
  39. Yilmaz B., Kale E., Johnston W.M. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (1): 65—70. PMID: 29475755
  40. Nikol‘skiĭ V.Iu., Razumnyĭ V.A. Dental implantation options and estimation of osseous integration in patients with complete teeth loss. Stomatology. 2013; 3: 100—104 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 19062602
  41. Baĭrikov I.M., Amirov R.Sh., Baĭrikov A.I. Experimental studies on the use of unwoven through-porous titanium material. Stomatology. 2013; 3: 15—16 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 19062580
  42. Golovina E., Kuznetsova E., Tlustenko V., Sadykov M., Tlustenko V. Clinical and radiological diagnosis of periimplantat mucositis and dental periimplantitis chronic flow. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2014; 6: 330—335 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22957792
  43. Kupryakhin S.V., Kupryakhin V.A., Lepilin A.V., Postnikov M.A., Kupryakhin A.V. Individual Dental Maxillary implant. Patent RU № 196213, effective from 29.05.2019 (In Russ.).
  44. Postnikov M.A., Nesterov A.M., Trunin D.A., Sadykov M.I., Gabdrafikov R.R., Sagirov M.R. Possibilities of diagnostics and complex treatment of patients with TMJ disfunctions. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 1 (93): 60—63 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 42846269
  45. Borgonovo A.E., Ferrario S., Maiorana C., Vavassori V., Censi R., Re D. A Clinical and radiographic evaluation of zirconia dental implants: 10-year follow-up. Int J Dent. 2021; 2021: 7534607. PMID: 35003263
  46. Barootchi S., Askar H., Ravidà A., Gargallo-Albiol J., Travan S., Wang H.L. Long-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of full-arch implant-supported zirconia-based and metal-acrylic fixed dental prostheses: A retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020; 35 (2): 395—405. PMID: 32142577
  47. Monzavi M., Noumbissi S., Nowzari H. The impact of in vitro accelerated aging, approximating 30 and 60 years in vivo, on commercially available zirconia dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 (2): 245—252. PMID: 27862871
  48. Laumbacher H., Strasser T., Knüttel H., Rosentritt M. Long-term clinical performance and complications of zirconia-based tooth- and implant-supported fixed prosthodontic restorations: A summary of systematic reviews. J Dent. 2021; 111: 103723. PMID: 34119611
  49. De Angelis P., Gasparini G., Camodeca F., De Angelis S., Liguori M.G., Rella E., Cannata F., D.’Addona A., Manicone P.F. Technical and biological complications of screw-retained (CAD/CAM) monolithic and partial veneer zirconia for fixed dental prostheses on posterior implants using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 5581435. PMID: 34307657
  50. Mesquita A.M.M., Al-Haj Husain N., Molinero-Mourelle P., Özcan M. An intraoral repair method for chipping fracture of a multi-unit fixed zirconia reconstruction: A direct dental technique. Eur J Dent. 2021; 15 (1): 174—178. PMID: 33622015

Received

December 13, 2021

Accepted

February 11, 2022

Published on

March 1, 2022