DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_26

A clinical case of surgical removal of dystopia is the germ of a permanent tooth

Authors

  • K.K. Gasparyan 1, dentist, director
    ORCID: 0000-0002-5690-0011
  • A.S. Mosesova 2, assistant at the Pediatric dentistry, orthodontics and Maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-7267-5064
  • V.V. Volobuev 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Pediatric dentistry, orthodontics and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-9752-6911
  • A.F. Verapatvelyan 3, PhD in Medical Science, general director, orthodontist
    ORCID: 0000-0002-0919-2323
  • 1 Dr. Gasparyan Dentistry, 350033, Кrasnodar, Russia
  • 2 Kuban State Medical University, 350063, Krasnodar, Russia
  • 3 “Vera Dent” LLC, 350090, Krasnodar, Russia

Abstract

The prevalence of tooth retention in Russia varies from 4 to 29%, while the canines and third molars are most often affected by anomalies. One of the reasons for retention is dystopia of the germ of the tooth. The elimination of pathology is reduced either to the exposure of the tooth and further orthodontic treatment, or to the removal of the germ. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the technique of eliminating the dystopia of the tooth germ by turning it during surgery.
Materials and methods.
The publication describes two cases of elimination of the dystopia of the germ of the second premolars in children aged 9 and 11. Under local anesthesia, temporary molars were removed, the bottom of the hole was expanded with a milling cutter, the tooth germ was rotated into a vertical position with the help of an elevator, the wound was filled with a hemostatic sponge and sutured.
Results.
The postoperative period passed without complications. After 16—24 months, physiological eruption of premolars was observed. However, in both cases, local hypoplasia of the tooth enamel (spotted form) was diagnosed.
Conclusion.
Our clinical cases demonstrate the possibility of surgical treatment of an anomaly of the tooth position in the rudimentary stage. The method is quite simple and low-traumatic, it avoids many problems: teething with rotation around the axis, retention of teeth, development of follicular cyst, ankylosis of the tooth.

Key words:

retention, dystopia, tooth germ, pre-eruptive surgery, children

For Citation

[1]
Gasparyan K.K., Mosesova A.S., Volobuev V.V., Verapatvelyan A.F. A clinical case of surgical removal of dystopia is the germ of a permanent tooth. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (1): 26—31. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_26

References

  1. Vakushina E.A., Bragin A.E., Grigorenko P.A., Bragin S.E. Detection of gnathological triad index in patients with retention of permanent teeth by modern diagnostic methods. Medical News of North Caucasus. 2013; 1: 42—44 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18930206
  2. Fadeev R.A., Sheveleva U.P. Improving the diagnostics and treatment methods of tooth retention (Part I). The Dental Institute. 2014; 2 (63): 18—20 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22133934
  3. Gaivoronskiy I.V., Nikolenko V.N., Iordanishvili A.K., Gaivoronskaya M.G., Ponomarev A.A. Anatomical reasons for the retention of third molars on mandibula. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin “Man and His Health”. 2015; 2: 61—65 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 23757109
  4. Kuznetsova E.B., Gurgenidze A.P., Koparzova O.A., Loginopulo O.V., Kuznetsov P.A., Klinovskaya A.S. Innovative technologies in treatment with retention of permanent teeth in children and adolescents. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2014; 5: 18—19 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22512491
  5. Alberto P.L. Surgical Exposure of Impacted Teeth. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020; 32 (4): 561—570. PMID: 32912779
  6. Dalessandri D., Migliorati M., Visconti L., Contardo L., Kau C.H., Martin C. KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 537620. PMID: 25126566
  7. Almurat S.S., Aimukhanbetov B.B. The frequency of occurrence of retained and dystopic teeth among children. International Research Journal. 2015; 1—4 (32): 5—8 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22960170
  8. Voskanyan A.R. Effective treatment of children with retention of permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2015; 4 (55): 51—54 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25373529
  9. Tkachenko P.I., Dmytrenko M.I., Cholovskyi M.O. Optimization of surgical-orthodontic treatment tactics in patients with impacted teeth. Wiad Lek. 2019; 72 (5 cz 1): 838—845. PMID: 31175782
  10. Cruz R.M. Orthodontic traction of impacted canines: Concepts and clinical application. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019; 24 (1): 74—87. PMID: 30916252
  11. Ghaeminia H., Nienhuijs M.E., Toedtling V., Perry J., Tummers M., Hoppenreijs T.J., Van der Sanden W.J., Mettes T.G. Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 5: CD003879. PMID: 32368796
  12. Mohd Mokhtar S., Abd Jalil L., Muhd Noor N. Autotransplantation of Ectopic Permanent Maxillary Incisors. Case Rep Dent. 2017; 2017: 7361924. PMID: 28352481
  13. Shi R., Zhou Z., Li P., Shi L., Sun H., Bai Y. In situ rotation surgery for correction of growing, inversely impacted maxillary central incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021; 159 (4): 536—544. PMID: 33568277
  14. Kim S., Kim J., Song J.S., Choi H.J., Choi B.J., Kim S.O. Continued root development of a surgically repositioned human incisor tooth germ. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013; 115 (5): e11—5. PMID: 22771411
  15. Agrait E.M., Levy D., Gil M., Singh G.D. Repositioning an inverted maxillary central incisor using a combination of replantation and orthodontic movement: a clinical case report. Pediatr Dent. 2003; 25 (2): 157—60. PMID: 12723843
  16. Ulusoy A.T., Akkocaoglu M., Akan S., Kocadereli I., Cehreli Z.C. Reimplantation of an inverted maxillary premolar: case report of a multidisciplinary treatment approach. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009; 33 (4): 279—82. PMID: 19725231
  17. Erturk S., Seckin T., Ermis G., Seckin O. Complication from an extraction of a primary tooth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1997; 21 (4): 291—3. PMID: 9484114
  18. Bello S.A., Enebong D.J., Obi E.V. Swinging replantation: A possible protocol for the management of inverted impacted upper central incisor tooth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18 (1): 69—73. PMID: 28050990
  19. Kuroe K., Tomonari H., Soejima K., Maeda A. Surgical repositioning of a developing maxillary permanent central incisor in a horizontal position: spontaneous eruption and root formation. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28 (3): 206—9. PMID: 16464872
  20. Kim G., Lee J., Nam S. Eruption guidance of horizontally angulated, distally displaced mandibular second premolars: Three case reports. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2019; 20 (3): 194—198. PMID: 31489817
  21. Gasparyan K.K., Verapatvelyan A.F., Mosesova A.S., Miroshnikova M.S. Method for correction of physiological malposition of permanent teeth germs with unformed roots. Patent No. RU 2676465, effective from 11.12.2017 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 37348734
  22. Mitropanova M.N., Verapatveljan A.F., Gasparjan K.K., Mosesova A.S., Miroshnikova M.S. The experience of surgical elimination of the dystopia of the rudiment of the permanent tooth. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2018; 2 (86): 34—36 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 35154626
  23. van der Weijden F.N., Kuitert R.B., Berkhout F.R.U., van der Weijden G.A. Influence of tooth position on wind instrumentalists’ performance and embouchure comfort: A systematic review. J Orofac Orthop. 2018; 79 (3): 205—218. PMID: 29532091

Received

December 9, 2021

Accepted

March 9, 2022

Published on

March 1, 2022