DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_20

Special characteristics of odontometric parameters of the indigenous residents of Southwestern Africa

Authors

  • I.K. Gabrielyan 1, assistant at the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-1006-0915
  • I.V. Masterova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0002-4636-4622
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

When creating high-quality aesthetic dental restorations, it is necessary to take into account the individual and ethnic characteristics of the patient. The aim is to study the morphometric parameters of teeth in representatives of the eastern bantoid type of the Negro race (Namibia) in comparison with the odontometric indicators of representatives of the Mongoloid (indigenous inhabitants of Elista, Kalmykia) and Caucasoid races (indigenous inhabitants of the Oryol region) for planning aesthetic dental restoration.
Materials and methods.
We examined 29 volunteers (22 women and 7 men) aged 20—25 years old, indigenous people of Namibia, students of the RUDN University. In the university dental clinic, two-layer, one-stage anatomical impressions were obtained and gypsum models of the dentition were made, on which measurements were carried out using a digital caliper. In this study, the odontometric parameters (3 absolute and 5 relative) were studied: width, height, thickness, massiveness, modulus, tooth crown index, inter-incisal and molar step indices. A comparative analysis of the results obtained with similar data from representatives of two contrasting ethnic groups: Kalmyks and Russians was carried out.
Results.
In the indigenous inhabitants of Namibia, the width of the canines is 0.5—0.6 mm less, and the width of the second premolars is larger by the same amount in comparison with those of the representatives of the indigenous inhabitants of Kalmykia and the Oryol region. In representatives of the Negro race, the height, width and massiveness of the crowns of the lateral teeth, especially molars, are significantly bigger than in Mongoloids and Caucasians. When analyzing odontometric parameters, significant differences were noted in the sequence of mesiodistal sizes in the class of molars in the examined groups: in Kalmyks and Russian mesiodistal size of the first molar is larger than that of the second, both on the upper and lower jaws; and in Namibians — on the lower jaw, the second molar according to the mesiodistal parameter is larger than the first molar.
Conclusion.
From the standpoint of planning the restoration of teeth in an aesthetically significant area, the identified features of the odontometric parameters of canines and premolars in the indigenous people of Namibia should be taken into account. Significant differences were revealed in odontometric parameters in the mesiodistal and vestibulo-oral sizes of the lateral group of teeth of the indigenous inhabitants of Namibia and representatives of other ethnic groups. The revealed features of the crowns of the teeth of the studied racial-ethnic groups indicate the advisability of an in-depth study of the structure and shape of the dentition for effective complex dental rehabilitation.

Key words:

dentistry, teeth, ethnic groups, odontometry

For Citation

[1]
Gabrielyan I.K., Masterova I.V. Special characteristics of odontometric parameters of the indigenous residents of Southwestern Africa. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (1): 20—25. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_1_20

References

  1. Adebanke K.K., Temitope O.D., Oke O.A., Abiodun O.G. Comparison of tooth dimensions of an orthodontic patient population and normal population of Nigerians. Journal of Research in Dentistry. 2020; 7 (4): 59. DOI: 10.19177/jrd.v7e4201959—65.
  2. Alqahtani A.S., Habib S.R., Ali M., Alshahrani A.S., Alotaibi N.M., Alahaidib F.A. Maxillary anterior teeth dimension and relative width proportion in a Saudi subpopulation. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021; 16 (2): 209—216. PMID: 33897325
  3. da Silva P.R., Lopes M.C., Martins-Filho I.E., Haye Biazevic M.G., Michel-Crosato E. Tooth crown mesiodistal measurements for the determination of sexual dimorphism across a range of populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2019; 37 (1): 2—19. PMID: 31187738
  4. Shaweesh A.I. Mesiodistal and faciolingual diameters of the permanent teeth in a Jordanian population. Arch Oral Biol. 2017; 73: 253—258. PMID: 27810383
  5. Togoo R.A., Alqahtani W.A., Abdullah E.K., A. Alqahtani A.S., AlShahrani I., Zakirulla M., Alhotellah K.A., Mujam O.H. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth width in individuals from three ethnic groups in Southern Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019; 22 (4): 553—557. PMID: 30975962
  6. Pratapiene M., Cicciù M., Juodzbalys G. Canines mesiodistal measures as the key to sex prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Pediatr. 2016; 68 (4): 288—98. PMID: 26154527
  7. Romero A., Ramirez-Rozzi F.V., Pérez-Pérez A. Dental size variability in Central African Pygmy hunter-gatherers and Bantu-speaking farmers. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018; 166 (3): 671—681. PMID: 29566431
  8. Abaid S., Zafar S., Kruger E., Tennant M. Mesiodistal dimensions and sexual dimorphism of teeth of contemporary Western Australian adolescents. J Oral Sci. 2021; 63 (3): 247—251. PMID: 34011827
  9. Filipovic G., Kanjevac T., Cetenovic B., Ajdukovic Z., Petrovic N. Sexual dimorphism in the dimensions of teeth in Serbian population. Coll Antropol. 2016; 40 (1): 23—8. PMID: 27301233
  10. Deepak V., Goryawala S.N., Reddy Y., Chhabra R.J., Nandaprasad, Shah N.K. Assessment of ethnicity in Indian population using tooth crown metric dental traits. J Int Oral Health. 2015; 7 (9): 83—7. PMID: 26435624
  11. Lomiashvili L.M., Pogadaev D.V., Mikhailovsky S.G., Vayts S.V., Gateluk O.V., Simonyan L.A. Tooth as a harmonious object created by nature. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 2 (94): 13—17 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 43125598
  12. Wang Y., Song Y., Zhong Q., Xu C. Evaluation of influence factors on the width, length, and width to length ratio of the maxillary central incisor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33 (2): 351—363. PMID: 32643266
  13. Hasegawa Y., Amarsaikhan B., Chinvipas N., Tsukada S., Terada K., Uzuka S., Miyashita W., Iguchi S., Arai K., Kageyama I., Nakahara S. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth crown diameters and arch dimensions between modern Mongolians and Japanese. Odontology. 2014; 102 (2): 167—75. PMID: 24026430
  14. Jain S., Reddy M., Raghav P., Jain S., Anjum A., Misra V., Suri R. Assessment of tooth proportions in an aesthetically acceptable smile. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9 (4): ZC01—4. PMID: 26023632
  15. Ayupova F.S. Diagnosis of abnormalities of upper dental arch and its segments. Kazan Medical Journal. 2013; 1: 131—133 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18794514
  16. Gaboutchian A.V., Knyaz V.A., Korost D.V. New approach to dental morphometric research based on 3D imaging techniques. J Imaging. 2021; 7 (9): 184. PMID: 34564110
  17. Beygelman Y.A., Khosravi R., Masoud M., Turpin D., Bollen A.M. The influence of labiolingual and mesiodistal anterior tooth dimensions on interarch relationships: A modified anterior Bolton analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156 (6): 727—734. PMID: 31784006
  18. Markova G.B., Alishlalov S.A., Markov B.P., Nikolaeva I.N., Galankina M.A. Aesthetic correction of the upper frontal teeth in representatives of the Caucasian and Mongoloid races. Dental Forum. 2021; 4 (83): 56 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 47157378
  19. Yusupov R.D., Dmitrienko S.V., Chizhikova T.S., Chizhikova T.V., Magomadov I.S-A. Ethnical peculiarities of dental arches of Eastern Siberia population. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015; 3—4: 715—720 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 23295202
  20. Badran M., Mao J. The validity of Pont’s index application to both Chinese and Egyptian populations (a pilot study). West Kazakhstan Medical Journal. 2016; 4 (52): 25—29 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29009091
  21. Mollabashi V., Soltani M.K., Moslemian N., Akhlaghian M., Akbarzadeh M., Samavat H., Abolvardi M. Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population. Int Orthod. 2019; 17 (1): 143—150. PMID: 30770330
  22. Saritha T., Sunitha C., Kiran Kumar P., Naveen R. Applicability of Bolton’s analysis to a South Telangana population. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2017; 9 (4): 225—32. DOI: 10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_95_17.
  23. Fernandes T.M., Sathler R., Natalício G.L., Henriques J.F., Pinzan A. Comparison of mesiodistal tooth widths in Caucasian, African and Japanese individuals with Brazilian ancestry and normal occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013; 18 (3): 130—5. PMID: 24094023
  24. Maharjan A., Joshi S. Clinical evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth in relation to golden proportion, red proportion and golden percentage. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018; 16 (1): 11—15. PMID: 29717282
  25. Kantrong N., Traiveat K., Wongkhantee S. Natural upper anterior teeth display an increasing proportion in mesio-distal direction. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019; 11 (10): e890-e897. PMID: 31636858
  26. Shetty T.B., Beyuo F., Wilson N.H.F. Upper anterior tooth dimensions in a young-adult Indian population in the UK: implications for aesthetic dentistry. Br Dent J. 2017; 223 (10): 781—786. PMID: 29171516
  27. Masterova I.V., Gabrielyan I.K., Khvan V.I. The ethnic factor in dentistry as a component of personalized medicine. Stomatology. 2019; 5: 108—112 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41314065
  28. Orozco-Varo A., Arroyo-Cruz G., Martínez-de-Fuentes R., Jiménez-Castellanos E. Biometric analysis of the clinical crown and the width/length ratio in the maxillary anterior region. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (6): 565—70. PMID: 25858215
  29. Machado V., Botelho J., Mascarenhas P., Mendes J.J., Delgado A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on Bolton’s ratios: Normal occlusion and malocclusion. J Orthod. 2020; 47 (1): 7—29. PMID: 31718451

Received

December 9, 2021

Accepted

March 16, 2022

Published on

March 1, 2022