DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_3_54

Mathematical calculation for early functional loading of dental implants

Downloads

Authors

  • A.A. Kulakov 1, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor
  • A.S. Kasparov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, dental surgeon at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • D.A. Porfenchuk 1, dentistry surgeon, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Department
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The aim — to develop objective screening methods for predicting complications of dental implantation, which have high sensitivity and specificity to provide the necessary preventive and therapeutic measures to improve the efficiency of the selected protocol for early functional loading. Materials and methods. Implantation using the protocol of early functional loading was performed in connection with the loss of the 4—7th teeth of the upper and lower jaws. The study participants underwent the installation of Thommen Medical (27 implants), Astra Tech (26 implants) and Konmet (7 implants) conical and cylindrical shapes. The primary stability was measured with an Osstell resonance frequency analyzer (Sweden). Results. The primary stability of implants installed in the upper jaw is lower than in the lower one due to the anatomical features of the jaw. From the obtained results of the Torque/ISQ analysis, conical implants have an advantage in the upper jaw, and cylindrical ones in the lower jaw. Conclusions. A mathematical model has been developed that describes the dependence of the initial results of determining the torque and ISQ during the operation and subsequent failure of the functioning of dental implants. When installing dental implants, an assessment of the primary stability of implants and the use of a mathematical model to identify risk groups should be included in the operation protocol. The development and implementation of models for predicting the outcomes of dental implantation contributed to the choice of the correct tactics for the timing of orthopedic treatment, an increase in the life of implants and an improvement in the quality of dental care for patients.

Key words:

dental implantation, osseointegration, coating, functional load

For Citation

[1]
Kulakov A.A., Kasparov A.S., Porfenchuk D.A. Mathematical calculation for early functional loading of dental implants. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 3 (95): 54—60. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_3_54

References

  1. Gus’kov A.V., Mitin N.E., Zimankov D.A., Mirnigmatova D.B., Grishin M.I. Dental implants: state of the question today (literature review). — Clinical Dentistry (Moscow). — 2017; 2 (82): 32—4 (In Russ.).
  2. Dobrovolskaya O.V. Early prosthetics on implants. — Actual Problems of Contemporary Medicine News of the Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy. — 2007; 4: 333—5 (In Russ.).
  3. Eroshin V.A., Dzhalalova M.V., Arutyunov S.D., Stepanov A.G., Bagdasaryan G.G., Antonik M.M., Grachev D.I. Mobility and criteria for the readiness of dental implants to functional loads. — Modern Problems of Science and Education. — 2018; 2: 53 (In Russ.).
  4. Zyul’kina L.A., Makarova N.I., Gryzunkova J.E., PateevaYu.N., Kriushin A.E. The choice of the method of functional loading of the implant — immediate, early, delayed loading. — Avicenna. — 2018; 20: 8—13 (In Russ.).
  5. Iordanishvili A.K., Veretenko E.A., Serikov A.A., Lobeyko V.V., Balin D.V. Total tooth loss in adults: age-related features of prevalence, needs in treatment and clinical picture. — Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin “Man and His Health”. — 2015; 1: 23—32 (In Russ.).
  6. Smirnova L.E., Filimonova L.B. Legislative and regulatory legal support for dental implantation. — Stomatologiya. — 2016; 6: 129—30 (In Russ.).
  7. Fokina A.A., Evstafieva O.L. Biochemical studies in assessing the integration of dental implants. — Proceedings of the “In the world of science and innovation” conference. — Part 5. — Kazan, 2017. — P. 191—195 (In Russ.).
  8. Alghamdi H.S. Methods to improve osseointegration of dental implants in low quality (type-IV) bone: an overview. — J Funct Biomater. — 2018; 9 (1): 7. PMID: 29342830
  9. Cannizzaro G., Gastaldi G., Gherlone E., Vinci R., Loi I., Trullenque-Eriksson A., Esposito M. Two or three machined vs roughened surface dental implants loaded immediately supporting total fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial. — Eur J Oral Implantol. — 2017; 10 (3): 279—91. PMID: 28944356
  10. Degidi M., Daprile G., Piattelli A. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon’s perception and objective measurements. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2010; 25 (3): 558—61. PMID: 20556255
  11. Degidi M., Daprile G., Piattelli A. Influence of underpreparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: an in vitro study. — J Oral Maxillofac Surg. — 2015; 73 (6): 1084—8. PMID: 25861691
  12. Gottlow J., Barkarmo S., Sennerby L. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2012; 14 Suppl 1: e204—12. PMID: 22487460
  13. Greenstein G., Cavallaro J., Romanos G., Tarnow D. Clinical recommendations for avoiding and managing surgical complications associated with implant dentistry: a review. — J Periodontol. — 2008; 79 (8): 1317—29. PMID: 18672980
  14. Guljé F., Abrahamsson I., Chen S., Stanford C., Zadeh H., Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2013; 24 (12): 1325—31. PMID: 22938573
  15. Huang H.-L., Chang Y.-Y., Lin D.-J., Li Y.-F., Chen K.-T., Hsu J.-T. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: an in vitro model study. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2011; 22 (7): 691—8. PMID: 21054551
  16. Javed F., Romanos G.E. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. — J Dent. — 2010; 38 (8): 612—20. PMID: 20546821
  17. Merli M., Moscatelli M., Mariotti G., Piemontese M., Nieri M. Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. — J Clin Periodontol. — 2012; 39 (2): 196—202. PMID: 22118014
  18. Simunek A., Kopecka D., Brazda T., Strnad I., Capek L., Slezak R. Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2012; 27 (3): 619—27. PMID: 22616056
  19. Torsiglieri T., Raith S., Rau A., Deppe H., Hölzle F., Steiner T. Stability of edentulous, atrophic mandibles after insertion of different dental implants. A biomechanical study. — J Craniomaxillofac Surg. — 2015; 43 (5): 616—23. PMID: 25865491

Downloads

Published on

September 15, 2020