DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_2_61

The early functional loading protocol’s efficiency for various dental implants

Downloads

Authors

  • A.A. Kulakov 1, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor
  • A.S. Kasparov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, dental surgeon at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • D.A. Porfenchuk 1, dentistry surgeon, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Department
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The objective was to find out the early functional load effectiveness upon the dental implants installing of various systems, shapes, sizes. Materials and methods. The single center clinical, x-ray (CT, orthopantomography ) and laboratory study of 60 people for 2 years was conducted. Conclusions. Various root-type and cylindrical system implants are equally suitable for early functional load protocols. The implanted structures overall survival is 97.8%. Conical dental implants are in favour for implantation in the maxilla, cylindrical one is preferably for implantation in the mandibula. Short implants (less than 8 mm) do not ensure effective dental implants survival with early functional load.

Key words:

dental implantation, implantation, osseointegration, coating, functional load

For Citation

[1]
Kulakov A.A., Kasparov A.S., Porfenchuk D.A. The early functional loading protocol’s efficiency for various dental implants. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 2 (94): 61—66. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_2_61

References

  1. Ashuev Zh.A. To the question of substantiation of optimal terms of functional loads during dental implantation. — Medical Alphabet. — 2012; 7: 30—2 (In Russ.).
  2. Gus’kov A.V., Mitin N.E., Zimankov D.A., Mirnigmatova D.B., Grishin M.I. Dental implants: state of the question today (literature review). — Clinical Dentistry (Russia). — 2017; 2 (82): 32—4 (In Russ.).
  3. Nikitin A.A., Polupan P.V., Sipkin A.M., Nikitin D.A. Long-term results of the use of a one-stage surgical protocol of an operation and one-stage dental implants. — Medical Alphabet. — 2016; 29 (292): 42—9 (In Russ.).
  4. Ostashko A.A., Sizova S.V., Labis V.V. An experimental model of dental implantation. — Orenburg Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ural branch bulletin. — 2016; 2: 14 (In Russ.).
  5. Smirnova L.E., Filimonova L.B. Legislative and regulatory legal support of dental implantation. — Dentistry. — 2016; 6: 129—30 (In Russ.).
  6. Ushakov R.V. The use of BoneTrust plus dental implants with direct dental implantation and immediate loading. — Dentistry for All. — 2013; 2: 18—21 (In Russ.).
  7. Fokina A.A., Evstafieva O.L. Biochemical studies in assessing the integration of dental implants. — Proceedings of the conference “In the world of science and innovation”, Kazan, 2017. — Ufa: Aeterna, 2017. — Pp. 191—195 (In Russ.).
  8. Alghamdi H.S. Methods to improve osseointegration of dental implants in low quality (type-IV) bone: An overview. — J Funct Biomater. — 2018; 9 (1): 7. PMID: 29342830
  9. Aykas Yu. Features of individual oral hygiene in patients with dental implants. — Practitioner Dentist. — 2014; 2: 32—3 (In Russ.).
  10. Cannizzaro G., Gastaldi G., Gherlone E., Vinci R., Loi I., Trullenque-Eriksson A., Esposito M. Two or three machined vs roughened surface dental implants loaded immediately supporting total fixed prostheses: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial. — Eur J Oral Implantol. — 2017; 10 (3): 279—91. PMID: 28944356
  11. Degidi M., Daprile G., Piattelli A. Determination of primary stability: A comparison of the surgeon’s perception and objective measurements. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2010; 25 (3): 558—61. PMID: 20556255
  12. Degidi M., Daprile G., Piattelli A. Influence of underpreparation on primary stability of implants inserted in poor quality bone sites: An in vitro study. — J Oral Maxillofac Surg. — 2015; 73 (6): 1084—8. PMID: 25861691
  13. Gottlow J., Barkarmo S., Sennerby L. An Experimental Comparison of Two Different Clinically Used Implant Designs and Surfaces. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2012; 14 Suppl 1: e204—12. PMID: 22487460
  14. Guida L., Iezzi G., Annunziata M., Salierno A., Iuorio G., Costigliola G., Piattelli A. Immediate placement and loading of dental implants: a human histologic case report. — J Periodontol. — 2008; 79 (3): 575—81. PMID: 18315443
  15. Guljé F., Abrahamsson I., Chen S., Stanford C., Zadeh H., Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2013; 24 (12): 1325—31. PMID: 22938573
  16. Huang H.-L., Chang Y.-Y., Lin D.-J., Li Y.-F., Chen K.-T., Hsu J.-T. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: an in vitro model study. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2011; 22 (7): 691—8. PMID: 21054551
  17. Javed F., Romanos G.E. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. a literature review. — J Dent. — 2010; 38 (8): 612—20. PMID: 20546821
  18. Merli M., Moscatelli M., Mariotti G., Piemontese M., Nieri M. Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. — J Clin Periodontol. — 2012; 39 (2): 196—202. PMID: 22118014
  19. Mura P. Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome. — Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. — 2012; 14 (4): 565—74. PMID: 20662861
  20. Pozzi A., Mura P. Immediate loading of conical connection implants: up-to-2-year retrospective clinical and radiologic study. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2016; 31 (1): 142—52. PMID: 26800171
  21. Romanos G.E., Toh C.G., Siar C.H., Swaminathan D. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca Fascicularis. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2002; 17 (1): 44—51. PMID: 11858574
  22. Simunek A., Kopecka D., Brazda T., Strnad I., Capek L., Slezak R. Development of implant stability during early healing of immediately loaded implants. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2012; 27 (3): 619—27. PMID: 22616056
  23. Tatum C.L., Saltz A.E., Prihoda T.J., DeGroot B.S., Mealey B.L., Mills M.P., Huynh-Ba G. Management of thick and thin periodontal phenotypes for immediate dental implants in the esthetic zone: a controlled clinical trial. — Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. — 2020; 40 (1): 51—9. PMID: 31815973
  24. Torsiglieri T., Raith S., Rau A., Deppe H., Hölzle F., Steiner T. Stability of edentulous, atrophic mandibles after insertion of different dental implants. a biomechanical study. — J Craniomaxillofac Surg. — 2015; 43 (5): 616—23. PMID: 25865491

Downloads

Published on

July 25, 2020