Comparative evaluation of methods of dentin surface treatment for indirect restorations

Downloads

Authors

  • S.A. Nikolaenko 1, д.м.н., профессор
  • E.A. Chelnokova , соискатель
  • A.I. Zubarev 2
  • S.N. Babenko 2
  • L.A. Shapiro 3, доцент кафедры медицинской и биологической физики
  • U. Lohbauer 4, доктор наук, приват-доцент, клиника стоматологии № 1
  • 1 НИИ медицинских проблем Севера СО РАМН
  • 2 Профессорская стоматология «ЗубНик»
  • 3 Красноярский государственный медицинский университет
  • 4 Университет им. Фридриха-Александра

For Citation

[1]
Nikolaenko S.A., Chelnokova E.A., Zubarev A.I., Babenko S.N., Shapiro L.A., Lohbauer U. Comparative evaluation of methods of dentin surface treatment for indirect restorations. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2012; 4 (64): 22—25

References

  1. Николаенко С.А. Исследование влияния воздушно-абразивной обработки на адгезию к дентину. - Клиническая стоматология. - 2005; 4(36): 6-9.
  2. Armstrong S.R., Keller J.C., Boyer D.B. The influence of water storage and c-factor on the dentin-resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled adhesive resin. - Dent Mater. - 2001; 17(3): 268-76.
  3. Aschenbrenner C.M., Lang R., Handel G. et al. Analysis of marginal adaptation and sealing to enamel and dentin of four self-adhesive resin cements. - Clin Oral Investig. - 2012; 16(1): 191-200.
  4. Beier U.S., Kapferer I., Dumfahrt H. Clinical long-term evaluation and failure characteristics of 1,335 all-ceramic restorations. - Int J Prosthodont. - 2012; 25(1): 70-8.
  5. Bester S.P., De Wet F.A., Nel J.C. et al. The effect of airbone particle abrasion on the dentin smear layer and dentin: an in vitro investigation. - Int J Prosthodont. - 1995; 8(1): 46-50.
  6. Chaiyabutr Y., Kois J.C. The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. - Oper Dent. - 2008; 33(5): 556-63.
  7. Frankenberger R., Krämer N., Appelt A. et al. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. - Dent Mater. - 2011; 27(9): 892-8.
  8. Frankenberger R., Lohbauer U., Taschner M. et al. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. - J Adhes Dent. - 2007; 9(2): 269-73.
  9. Hahn P., Schaller H.G., Hafner P. et al. Effect of different luting procedures on the seating of ceramic inlays. - J Oral Rehabil. - 2000; 27(1): 1-8.
  10. Hikita K., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J. et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. - Dent Mater. - 2006; 23(1): 71-80.
  11. Hill E.E., Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. - Aust Dent J. - 2011; 56(1): 67-76.
  12. Krämer N., Taschner M., Lohbauer U. et al. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. - J Adhes Dent. - 2008; 10(4): 307-14.
  13. Manso A.G., Gonzalez-Lopez S., Bolaños-Carmona V. et al. Regional bond strength to lateral walls in class I and II ceramic inlays luted with four resin cements and glass-ionomer luting agent. - J Adhes Dent. - 2011; 13(5): 455-65.
  14. Pol C.W., Kalk W. A systematic review of ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: an update. - Int J Prosthodont. - 2011; 24(6): 566-75.
  15. Santos M.J., Bapoo H., Rizkalla A.S. et al. Effect of dentin-cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin. - Oper Dent. - 2011; 36(5): 512-20.

Downloads

Published on

December 1, 2012