DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_4_111

The relationship between parafunctional habits and temporomandibular joint dysfunction dysfunction

Authors

  • L.A. Ignateva 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor of the Pediatric dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3159-6639
  • Z.A. Safiullina 1, 4th year student at the Dental Faculty
    ORCID: 0009-0001-3139-8897
  • A.A. Shaimardanov 1, 4th year student at the Dental Faculty
    ORCID: 0009-0004-4852-1734
  • 1 Kazan State Medical University, 420012, Kazan, Russia

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMJ) pain dysfunction syndrome is a multifactorial disease. Numerous studies have shown a relationship between the functional state of the TMJ, occlusion, and the musculoskeletal system. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of TMJ disorders among students and compare their prevalence with occlusal factors and parafunctional habits.
Materials and methods.
A total of 155 volunteers with TMJ disorders were selected among students based on their complaints. CT scans of the TMJ were studied, and occlusal analysis was performed based on morphological and functional changes. Cases of teeth grinding and clenching were identified through questioning.
Results.
Myofascial pain was experienced by 18.2% of subjects, and 12.3% had joint disorder with disc displacement. Teeth clenching was not statistically associated with TMJ dysfunction (p≤0.01). In occlusal factors, overlap showed a statistically significant correlation only with myofascial pain. No association was found between functional change and TMJ dysfunction.

Key words:

myofascial pain syndrome, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, bruxism, dental occlusion

For Citation

[1]
Ignateva L.A., Safiullina Z.A., Shaimardanov A.A. The relationship between parafunctional habits and temporomandibular joint dysfunction dysfunction. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (4): 111—113. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_4_111

References

  1. Pahkala R., Qvarnström M. Can temporomandibular dysfunction signs be predicted by early morphological or functional variables? —Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26 (4): 367—73. PMID: 15366380
  2. Xie Q., Li X., Xu X. The difficult relationship between occlusal interferences and temporomandibular disorder — insights from animal and human experimental studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40 (4): 279—95. PMID: 23356664
  3. Landi N., Manfredini D., Tognini F., Romagnoli M., Bosco M. Quantification of the relative risk of multiple occlusal variables for muscle disorders of the stomatognathic system. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92 (2): 190—5. PMID: 15295330
  4. Wang C., Yin X. Occlusal risk factors associated with temporomandibular disorders in young adults with normal occlusions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 114 (4): 419—23. PMID: 22841427
  5. Wongwatana S., Kronman J.H., Clark R.E., Kabani S., Mehta N. Anatomic basis for disk displacement in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 105 (3): 257—64. PMID: 8135209
  6. Nassar M.S., Palinkas M., Regalo S.C., Sousa L.G., Siéssere S., Semprini M., Bataglion C., Bataglion C. The effect of a Lucia jig for 30 minutes on neuromuscular re-programming, in normal subjects. Braz Oral Res. 2012; 26 (6): 530—5. PMID: 23019085
  7. Cairns B.E. Pathophysiology of TMD pain—basic mechanisms and their implications for pharmacotherapy. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37 (6): 391—410. PMID: 20337865

Received

March 16, 2025

Accepted

November 25, 2025

Published on

December 18, 2025