DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_64

Individual selection of interdental brushes using a web service

Authors

  • A.I. Zakharova 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
    ORCID: 0009-0004-4390-7574
  • A.I. Grudyanov 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, full professor of the Periodontology Department
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3818-9307
  • V.A. Badalyan 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor, leading researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
    ORCID: 0000-0003-3885-9358
  • F.F. Losev 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor, director
    ORCID: 0000-0002-9448-9614
  • G.S. Pashkova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, periodontist
    ORCID: 0000-0003-4030-743X
  • L.E. Smirnova 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, scientific secretary
    ORCID: 0000-0003-4876-9882
  • A.V. Vasilyev 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, head of Scientific laboratorial research Office
    ORCID: 0000-0002-7169-2724
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the INTERDENTALBRUSHES.ONLINE web service for individual selection of interdental brushes in patients with chronic periodontitis.
Materials and methods.
The randomized controlled trial included 42 patients with mild to moderate chronic periodontitis aged 35 to 65 years, divided into 4 groups: I — individually selected interdental brushes using the web service (n=12); II — self-selected brushes (n=10); III — without using brushes, only toothbrush, floss, and irrigator (n=10); IV — individually selected brushes using traditional paper-based recommendations (n=10). Brush selection was carried out using an IAP (Interdental Access Probe) with color coding. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using OHI-S, Mühlemann, and Russell indices at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months after starting the study. Time spent on brush selection and patient adherence to recommendations were also evaluated.
Results.
 After 3 months, Group I showed a statistically significant reduction in all indices compared to other groups: OHI-S from 2.5±0.3 to 0.5±0.2, Mühlemann index from 2.1±0.8 to 0.4±0.1, and Russell index from 4.5±0.9 to 1.2±0.3 (p<0.001). The use of the web service reduced brush selection time from 7.6±1.2 to 3.1±0.7 minutes (p<0.001) and increased patient adherence to recommendations to 83% versus 60% when using traditional paper-based recommendations (p<0.05).
Conclusion.
The use of a web service for individual selection of interdental brushes significantly improves the effectiveness of therapeutic and preventive measures in patients with chronic periodontitis by reducing the time spent on selecting hygiene products, increasing patient adherence to recommendations, and improving clinical indicators of periodontal tissue health.

Key words:

interdental brushes, web service, individual hygiene, periodontitis, treatment adherence, personalized medicine

For Citation

[1]
Zakharova A.I., Grudyanov A.I., Badalyan V.A., Losev F.F., Pashkova G.S., Smirnova L.E., Vasilyev A.V. Individual selection of interdental brushes using a web service. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (3): 64—71. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_64

References

  1. Tonetti M.S., Jepsen S., Jin L., Otomo-Corgel J. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: A call for global action. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 (5): 456—462. PMID: 28419559
  2. Socransky S.S., Haffajee A.D. Periodontal microbial ecology. Periodontol 2000. 2005; 38: 135—87. PMID: 15853940
  3. Grudyanov A.I. Periodontal diseases. Moscow: MIA, 2022. Pp. 296—298 (In Russian).
  4. Marchesan J.T., Morelli T., Moss K., Preisser J.S., Zandona A.F., Offenbacher S., Beck J. Interdental cleaning is associated with decreased oral disease prevalence. J Dent Res. 2018; 97 (7): 773—778. PMID: 29481764
  5. van der Weijden F.A., Slot D.E. Efficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis a meta review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42 Suppl 16: S77—91. PMID: 25597787
  6. Orekhova L.Yu., Prokhorova O.V., Shalamai L.I., Rachina D.V., Burenkova N.E. Comparative study of combined subgingival plaque removal techniques. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2020; 2 (74): 109—115 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 42935529
  7. Bourgeois D., Saliasi I., Llodra J.C., Bravo M., Viennot S., Carrouel F. Efficacy of interdental calibrated brushes on bleeding reduction in adults: a 3-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124 (6): 566—571. PMID: 27681016
  8. Sälzer S., Graetz C., Dörfer C.E., Slot D.E., Van der Weijden F.A. Contemporary practices for mechanical oral hygiene to prevent periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000. 2020; 84 (1): 35—44. PMID: 32844413
  9. Slot D.E., Valkenburg C., Van der Weijden G.A.F. Mechanical plaque removal of periodontal maintenance patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47 Suppl 22: 107—124. PMID: 32716118
  10. Trombelli L., Farina R., Pollard A., Claydon N., Franceschetti G., Khan I., West N. Efficacy of alternative or additional methods to professional mechanical plaque removal during supportive periodontal therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47 Suppl 22: 144—154. PMID: 32060940
  11. Graziani F., Karapetsa D., Alonso B., Herrera D. Nonsurgical and surgical treatment of periodontitis: how many options for one disease? —Periodontol 2000. 2017; 75 (1): 152—188. PMID: 28758300
  12. Nibali L., Koidou V.P., Hamborg T., Donos N. Empirical or microbiologically guided systemic antimicrobials as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy? A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46 (10): 999—1012. PMID: 31254278
  13. Jepsen S., Blanco J., Buchalla W., Carvalho J.C., Dietrich T., Dörfer C., Eaton K.A., Figuero E., Frencken J.E., Graziani F., Higham S.M., Kocher T., Maltz M., Ortiz-Vigon A., Schmoeckel J., Sculean A., Tenuta L.M., van der Veen M.H., Machiulskiene V. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2017; 44 Suppl 18: S85—S93. PMID: 28266120
  14. Caton J.G., Armitage G., Berglundh T., Chapple I.L.C., Jepsen S., Kornman K.S., Mealey B.L., Papapanou P.N., Sanz M., Tonetti M.S. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions — Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45 Suppl 20: S1—S8. PMID: 29926489
  15. Schwendicke F., Samek W., Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Chances and challenges. J Dent Res. 2020; 99 (7): 769—774. PMID: 32315260
  16. Carrouel F., Llodra J.C., Viennot S., Santamaria J., Bravo M., Bourgeois D. Access to interdental brushing in periodontal healthy young adults: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (5): e0155467. PMID: 27192409
  17. Cairo F., Barootchi S., Tavelli L., Barbato L., Wang H.L., Rasperini G., Graziani F., Tonetti M. Aesthetic-and patient-related outcomes following root coverage procedures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47 (11): 1403—1415. PMID: 32654220
  18. Ng E., Lim L.P. An Overview of different interdental cleaning aids and their effectiveness. Dent J (Basel). 2019; 7 (2): 56. PMID: 31159354

Received

April 29, 2025

Accepted

August 8, 2025

Published on

September 21, 2025