DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_4_96

Application of a new method for determining facial growth pattern in patients with distal occlusion

Authors

  • D.B. Kaplan 1, 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Orthodontics Department; senior researcher at the Medical research Division
    ORCID: 0009-0003-0760-355X
  • L.S. Persin 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor of the Orthodontics Department
    ORCID: 0000-0001-9971-5054
  • R.U. Bersanov 2, 3, Doctor of Science in Medicine, full professor of the Medical research Division; full professor of the General Dentistry Department
    ORCID: 0009-0005-1557-7130
  • 1 Russian University of Medicine, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Kh. Ibragimov Complex Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 364020, Grozny, Russia
  • 3 Kadyrov Chechen State University, 364024, Grozny, Russia

Abstract

Objective — to develop and clinically validate a new method for assessing facial growth patterns in patients with distal occlusion based on comprehensive analysis of angular parameters from lateral cephalometric radiographs using point Po as a stable reference.
Materials and methods.
The study included 40 patients (aged 18—40 years) with distal occlusion. The method evaluates six angular parameters (∠N—Po—Pg, ∠Po—N—Pg, ∠Po—Go—Pg, ∠Po—N—A, ∠Po—N—B, and ∠M) and their cumulative angle.
Results.
Significant differences in the total angle were found depending on the type of facial skeleton growth. In patients with distal occlusion, horizontal growth pattern angle was 433.9±6.2°, significantly lower than controls (p<0.001). The neutral growth pattern mean angle was 440.1±6.2°, showing no statistically significant difference from normative values (p>0.05). The vertical growth pattern mean angle was 446.3±6.2°, exceeding normative values by 1,7% (p<0.01). All measurements were taken with average mesiodistal dimensions of upper incisors of 30.3±0.3 mm.
Conclusions.
The obtained data demonstrate a clear relationship between facial growth pattern type and severity of distal occlusion.

Key words:

distal occlusion, cephalometry, craniofacial growth pattern, orthodontic diagnosis, craniometric analysis

For Citation

[1]
Kaplan D.B., Persin L.S., Bersanov R.U. Application of a new method for determining facial growth pattern in patients with distal occlusion. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (4): 96—100. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_4_96

References

  1. Dosmatova K.R., Altynbekov K.D., Kurakbayev K.K., Nigmatov R.N., Dosberdiyeva G.T., Bekturganova N.D., Glushkova N.E. Prevalence of dental anomalies for adults residing in Almaty and in Astana. Science and Healthcare. 2022; 6: 112—119 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 54757282
  2. Yermukhanova G.T., Yetekbaeva A.O. Study of the prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies, including distal bite in children and adolescents (literature review). Bulletin of the Kazakh National Medical University. 2021; 1: 133—137 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 46130748
  3. Danielova B.G., Persin L.S., Pankratova N.V., Repina T.V., Filatova O.S. Assessment of the state of the dental system in patients with distal occlusion using extraoral parameters of the lateral cephalometry. Orthodontics. 2022; 3 (99): 16—23 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 50253477
  4. Rozhkova M.G., Fischev S.B., Klimov A.G., Sevastyanov A.V., Puzdyreva M.N., Pavlova S.G. Diagnostic considerations and orthodontic treatment approaches of adolescents with the dentoalveolar form of class II malocclusion. Pediatric Dentistry and Profilaxis. 2024; 3 (91): 313—319 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 74036717
  5. Losev F.F., Popova N.V., Arsenina O.I., Vagner V.D., Gavrilova M.V. Quantitative objective and subjective assessment of the quality of treatment of patients with distal occlusion. Stomatology. 2022; 3: 70—76 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 48615529
  6. Subramanian A.K., Chen Y., Almalki A., Sivamurthy G., Kafle D. Cephalometric analysis in orthodontics using artificial intelligence — A comprehensive review. Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022: 1880113. PMID: 35757486
  7. Björk A., Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5 (1): 1—46. PMID: 6572593
  8. Baumrind S., Frantz R.C. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971; 60 (2): 111—27. PMID: 5283996
  9. Auconi P., McNamara J.A. jr, Franchi L. Computer-aided heuristics in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158 (6): 856—867. PMID: 33008708
  10. Vithanaarachchi N. 5th, Chandrasiri A.C., Nawarathna L.N. A comparison of cephalometric measurements obtained using conventional and digital methods. Ceylon Med J. 2020; 65 (3): 39—45. PMID: 34800930

Received

April 9, 2025

Accepted

September 24, 2025

Published on

December 18, 2025