DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_133

Application of the root shield technique in immediate dental implantation (literature review)

Authors

  • G.V. Khachatrian 1, dental surgeon, implantologist, prosthodontist, chief doctor
    ORCID: 0000-0003-2800-7522
  • A.G. Stepanov 2, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0000-0002-6543-0998
  • S.V. Apresyan 2, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor, director of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0000-0002-3281-707X
  • 1 “Cosmodent” clinic, 634049, Tomsk, Russia
  • 2 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

An analysis of literature data on the clinical effectiveness of the root shield technique in immediate dental implantation in an aesthetically significant area was conducted. The treatment approach, during which only part of the root is removed (partial extraction), includes the use of the “socket shield” and “pontic shield” techniques. To preserve the alveolar ridge and soft tissues of the oral cavity, the root submergence technique is also used, which has recently been increasingly used in performing dental implantation (DI). This method is usually used when performing implantation in the anterior region of the upper jaw in order to improve the aesthetic result of the treatment. Indications for the use of the Socket Shield technique are: the presence of vertical fractures; a tooth that cannot be restored and requires extraction; immediate implant placement; preservation of the alveolar ridge, in particular to prevent bucco-palatal collapse and to preserve the papillae or soft tissue around the implant. The main criteria for the effectiveness of the Socket Shield technique are implant survival and complication rate. Complications include severe pain, swelling, shield or implant displacement, peri-implantitis, loss of marginal bone tissue and shield resorption. Most studies have shown that the use of the shield method allows achieving a better aesthetic result compared to other methods, since it results in less pronounced alveolar bone resorption.
Conclusions.
Overall, the use of the shield technique is a promising method of DI, as it leads to higher DI efficacy rates: better bone volume preservation than with standard approaches, better aesthetic treatment outcome rates, and higher patient satisfaction with the performed DI. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to obtain strong evidence to recommend the use of this technique compared to traditional DI methods with immediate implantation.

Key words:

socket shield, immediate dental implantation, pink aesthetics, buccal plate, alveolar bone preservation

For Citation

[1]
Khachatrian G.V., Stepanov A.G., Apresyan S.V. Application of the root shield technique in immediate dental implantation (literature review). Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (3): 133—141. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_133

References

  1. Losev F.F., Brailovskaya T.B., Kalinin R.V. Use of dental implants in orthopedic rehabilitation of patients in aesthetically important area. Stomatology. 2022; 1: 84—88 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 48239893
  2. Costa A.J.M.E., Burgoa S., Pinhata-Baptista O.H., Gutierrez V., Cortes A.R.G. Digital workflow for image-guided immediate implant placement by using the socket-shield technique and custom abutment in the esthetic area. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 130 (2): 155—159. PMID: 34728071
  3. Yan S.J., Zhou C., Liu J., Xu X.N., Yang Y., Chen X., Lan J. [Clinical evaluation of the socket-shield technique for immediate implantation in the maxillary anterior region]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 37 (6): 615—620 (In Chinese). PMID: 31875439
  4. Heinemann F., Hasan I., Bourauel C., Biffar R., Mundt T. Bone stability around dental implants: Treatment related factors. Ann Anat. 2015; 199: 3—8. PMID: 25770887
  5. Ganeles J., Levine R.A., Tironi F., Dias D., Aranguren L., Norkin F.J. Application of the 10 keys checklist and partial extraction techniques to optimize esthetic outcomes for adjacent implants in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2025; 45 (3): 317—327. PMID: 38717440
  6. Stomatov D.V., Stomatov A.V., Efimov Yu.V., Avanesyan N.A., Tachukova E.P., Nizhadasl S.M. Application of a combination of the resorbable collagen membrane and the demineralized bone material in the technique of immediate dental implantation in conditions of a defect in the outer wall of the socket. International Dental Review. 2020; 3 (92): 26—29 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 44000968
  7. Salama M., Ishikawa T., Salama H., Funato A., Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 27 (6): 521—7. PMID: 18092446
  8. Blaschke C., Schwass D.R. The socket-shield technique: a critical literature review. Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6 (1): 52. PMID: 32893327
  9. Hürzeler M.B., Zuhr O., Schupbach P., Rebele S.F., Emmanouilidis N., Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37 (9): 855—62. PMID: 20712701
  10. Bishara M., Sinada N., Wu D.T., Miron R.J., Karateew D., Gluckman H., Salama M. Partial extraction therapy (Part 1): Applications in full-arch dental implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023; 43 (4): 443—449. PMID: 37552191
  11. Chvartszaid D., Oates T.W., Estafanous E., Ellingsen J.E., Osswald M. Socket shield technique: A new way to deal with an old problem. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023; 38 (6): 1078—1082. PMID: 38085738
  12. Mourya A., Mishra S.K., Gaddale R., Chowdhary R. Socket-shield technique for implant placement to stabilize the facial gingival and osseous architecture: A systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019; 10 (4): e12449. PMID: 31433130
  13. Ahamed M.S., Mundada B.P., Paul P., Reche A. Partial extraction therapy for implant placement: A newer approach in implantology practice. Cureus. 2022; 14 (11): e31414. PMID: 36523724
  14. Wu D.T., Raoof S., Latimer J.M., Nguyen T.T. Partial extraction therapy: A review of human clinical studies. J Oral Implantol. 2022; 48 (5): 436—454. PMID: 34937086
  15. Gluckman H., Salama M., Du Toit J. Partial extraction therapies (PET) part 2: Procedures and technical aspects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017; 37 (3): 377—385. PMID: 28402349
  16. Mattiola A., Bosshardt D., Schmidlin P.R. The rigid-shield technique: A new contour and clot stabilizing method for ridge preservation. Dent J (Basel). 2018; 6 (2): 21. PMID: 29914186
  17. Gharpure A.S., Bhatavadekar N.B. Current evidence on the socket-shield technique: A systematic review. J Oral Implantol. 2017; 43 (5): 395—403. PMID: 28604262
  18. Aslan S. Improved volume and contour stability with thin socket-shield preparation in immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018; 13 (2): 172—183. PMID: 29687096
  19. Gluckman H., Salama M., Du Toit J. A retrospective evaluation of 128 socket-shield cases in the esthetic zone and posterior sites: Partial extraction therapy with up to 4 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 20 (2): 122—129. PMID: 29178381
  20. Habashneh R.A., Walid M.A., Abualteen T., Abukar M. Socket-shield technique and immediate implant placement for ridge preservation: Case report series with 1-year follow-up. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019; 20 (9): 1108—1117. PMID: 31797838
  21. Mujawar S., Devkar N., Vibhute A., Deshpande M., Mali P. Socket shield technique: a review. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2018; 9 (6): 27612—27615. https://tinyurl.com/5f77d56b
  22. Han C.H., Park K.B., Mangano F.G. The modified socket shield technique. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29 (8): 2247—2254. PMID: 29561484
  23. Siormpas K.D., Mitsias M.E., Kontsiotou-Siormpa E., Garber D., Kotsakis G.A. Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the “root-membrane” technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (6): 1397—405. PMID: 25265125
  24. Sharma A., Maheshwari K., Tiwari B., Naik D. Socket shield technique: An unconventional method for immediate implant placement — A review. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 13 (Suppl 1): S24-S35. PMID: 36393931
  25. Kher U., Tunkiwala A., Shanbag S. A graftless socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 (Suppl. 17): 451. DOI: 10.1111/clr.336_13358
  26. Abitbol J., Antoun H., Degorce T. Outcome of dental implant with the socket shield technique: A retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27 (Suppl. 13): 530. DOI: 10.1111/clr.527_12958
  27. Gluckman H., Nagy K., Du Toit J. Prosthetic management of implants placed with the socket-shield technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 121 (4): 581—585. PMID: 30554825
  28. Lagas L.J., Pepplinkhuizen J.J., Bergé S.J., Meijer G.J. [Implant placement in the aesthetic zone: the socket-shield-technique]. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2015; 122 (1): 33—6 (In Dutch). PMID: 26192981
  29. Xu Y.M., Huang H., Wang L., Wu Q.Q., Fu G., Li J. [Comparison of clinical effects of a modified socket shield technique and the conventional immediate implant placement]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 37 (5): 490—495 (In Chinese). PMID: 31721495
  30. Hinze M., Janousch R., Goldhahn S., Schlee M. Volumetric alterations around single-tooth implants using the socket-shield technique: preliminary results of a prospective case series. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018; 13 (2): 146—170. PMID: 29687095
  31. Bäumer D., Zuhr O., Rebele S., Hürzeler M. Socket Shield technique for immediate implant placement — clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28 (11): 1450—1458. PMID: 28333394
  32. Ogawa T., Sitalaksmi R.M., Miyashita M., Maekawa K., Ryu M., Kimura-Ono A., Suganuma T., Kikutani T., Fujisawa M., Tamaki K., Kuboki T. Effectiveness of the socket shield technique in dental implant: A systematic review. J Prosthodont Res. 2022; 66 (1): 12—18. PMID: 33692284
  33. Zekry A., Wang R., Chau A.C., Lang N.P. Facial alveolar bone wall width — a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 (2): 194—206. PMID: 23294441
  34. Petropoulou A., Pappa E., Pelekanos S. Esthetic considerations when replacing missing maxillary incisors with implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109 (3): 140—4. PMID: 23522361
  35. Cosyn J., Eghbali A., De Bruyn H., Collys K., Cleymaet R., De Rouck T. Immediate single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38 (8): 746—53. PMID: 21752044
  36. Fürhauser R., Florescu D., Benesch T., Haas R., Mailath G., Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16 (6): 639—44. PMID: 16307569
  37. Bramanti E., Norcia A., Cicciù M., Matacena G., Cervino G., Troiano G., Zhurakivska K., Laino L. Postextraction dental implant in the aesthetic zone, socket shield technique versus conventional protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29 (4): 1037—1041. PMID: 29489581
  38. Sun C., Zhao J., Liu Z., Tan L., Huang Y., Zhao L., Tao H. Comparing conventional flap-less immediate implantation and socket-shield technique for esthetic and clinical outcomes: A randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31 (2): 181—191. PMID: 31680339
  39. Abadzhiev M., Nenkov P., Velcheva P. Conventional immediate implant placement and immediate placement with socket-shield technique— which is better. Int J Clin Med Res. 2014; 1 (5): 176—180. https://tinyurl.com/906882
  40. Belser U.C., Grütter L., Vailati F., Bornstein M.M., Weber H.P., Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009; 80 (1): 140—51. PMID: 19228100
  41. Yan Q., Xiao L.Q., Su M.Y., Mei Y., Shi B. Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Immediate Placement or Immediate Restoration of Single-Tooth Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 31 (6): 1327—1340. PMID: 27861657
  42. Weigl P., Strangio A. The impact of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants on hard and soft tissues in the anterior maxilla. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016; 9 Suppl 1: S89—106. PMID: 27314114
  43. Walid M.A., Alkhodary M.A. Socket shield and bioactive glass around anterior maxilla immediate dental implants. Egyptian dental journal. 2019; 65: 1535—1548. DOI: 10.21608/edj.2019.72578
  44. Barakat D.A., Hassan R.S., Eldibany R.M. Evaluation of the socket shield technique for immediate implantation. Alexandria Dental Journal. 2017; 42: 155—161. DOI: 10.21608/adjalexu.2017.57919
  45. Tiwari S., Bedi R.S., Wadhwani P., Aurora J.K., Chauhan H. Comparison of Immediate implant placement following extraction with and without socket-shield technique in esthetic region. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020; 19 (4): 552—560. PMID: 33071504
  46. Kan J.Y., Rungcharassaeng K., Lozada J.L., Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26 (1): 179—87. PMID: 21365054
  47. Ishikawa T., Fukuba S. Esthetic management of anterior implants in advanced periodontal defects. A case report. Int J Esthet Dent. 2024; 19 (1): 60—73. PMID: 38284944

Received

March 24, 2025

Accepted

August 31, 2025

Published on

September 21, 2025