DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_90

Determination of adhesive characteristics of creams for fixing removable dentures

Authors

  • I.R. Tskhovrebov 1, PhD candidate of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0009-0003-3352-8696
  • S.V. Apresyan 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor, director of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0000-0002-3281-707X
  • A.G. Stepanov 1, Doctor of Science in Medicine, professor of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0000-0002-6543-0998
  • O.O. Moskovets 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Institute of Digital Dentistry
    ORCID: 0000-0002-6479-8192
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Oral diseases remain a global health problem, and with the continued high prevalence of adentia, the key unresolved issue remains improving the fixation efficiency of removable dentures using adhesive materials. The aim is to evaluate the adhesive strength of dental creams to polymethyl methacrylate and photopolymer used in the technology of removable dentures.
Materials and methods.
The tests involved 9 samples of dental cream: 5 samples of Corega of different compositions and 4 other samples. The adhesive strength of dental creams was compared when two surfaces were glued together: the first surface was silicone rubber, and the second surface (substrate) was polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or a photopolymer for additive manufacturing of removable dentures bases (3D). The shear, tensile, and peel strengths were measured. A total of 11 experiments were conducted, including tests to determine the onset of adhesion and the optimal thickness.
Results.
The best shear results were shown by the “PresiDENT” samples for PMMA and “Corega: maximum fixation + comfort” for 3D photopolymer (2.24 and 2.12 kPa), the “Whiteberg” samples for PMMA and “Corega maximum fixation + comfort” samples for 3D photopolymer (30.3 and 28.7 kPa), for rupture. The separation is a “Whiteberg” sample for both PMMA structural materials and a photopolymer (1160 and 1158 kPa). In experiments to determine the onset of adhesion (after exposure for 3 minutes) and the completion of adhesive strength (after exposure for 12 hours), a higher strength value was also found in the “Whiteberg” sample (PMMA and 3D), in the Corega segment — samples with the composition “extrasensory fixation” (PMMA) and “maximum fixation + comfort” (PMMA and 3D). The assessment of the adhesive strength of creams depending on the thickness of the studied layer showed that in the presence of a gap of 100 microns, the value of the indicator in all samples drops sharply and then weakly correlates with an increase in the gap.
Conclusions.
Among Corega creams, the cream “Maximum fixation + comfort” showed the best result in shear and tear tests. In tear tests, two formulations are characterized by the same strength — “Maximum fixation + comfort” and “Extra-strong fixation”. Of the formulations from other manufacturers, 2 creams showed results comparable to Corega in all tests — these are “Whiteberg” and “PresiDENT”.

Key words:

complete adentia, removable denture, fixation of removable dentures, dental cream, adhesive strength, Corega

For Citation

[1]
Tskhovrebov I.R., Apresyan S.V., Stepanov A.G., Moskovets O.O. Determination of adhesive characteristics of creams for fixing removable dentures. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2025; 28 (3): 90—94. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2025_3_90

References

  1. Opoku P., Salu S., Azornu C.K., Komesuor J. Oral health knowledge, practice and associated factors among Junior High School students of Koforidua, Ghana: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24 (1): 449. PMID: 38609937
  2. Abdalla H., Allison P.J., Madathil S.A., Veronneau J.E., Pustavoitava N., Tikhonova S. Caries lesions progression in adults: A prospective 2-year cohort study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2024; 2024 Aug 19. (Online ahead of print). PMID: 39160698
  3. Alyafi R. Tooth loss status and the prevalence of dental restorations among the population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Sciences. 2023; 24 (8): 394—399. https://tinyurl.com/alyafi
  4. Silva-Junior M.F., Batista M.J., de Sousa M.D.L.R. Incidence of tooth loss in adults: A 4-year population-based prospective cohort study. Int J Dent. 2017; 2017: 6074703. PMID: 28785282
  5. Borg-Bartolo R., Roccuzzo A., Molinero-Mourelle P., Schimmel M., Gambetta-Tessini K., Chaurasia A., Koca-Ünsal R.B., Tennert C., Giacaman R., Campus G. Global prevalence of edentulism and dental caries in middle-aged and elderly persons: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2022; 127: 104335. PMID: 36265526
  6. Costa M.S., Lovato da Silva C.H., de Cássia Oliveira V., Watanabe E., Dos Reis A., Lepri C.P., de Castro D.T. Effects of different forms of denture adhesives on biofilm formation, adhesive strength and hygiene of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2022; 35 (6): 784—792. PMID: 33750997
  7. Techapiroontong S., Limpuangthip N. Oral health-related quality of life and reasons for discontinuing partial removable dental prosthesis usage: a cross-sectional study with one to seven years of follow-up. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24 (1): 355. PMID: 38504246
  8. Shaha M., Varghese R., Atassi M. Understanding the impact of removable partial dentures on patients’ lives and their attitudes to oral care. Br Dent J. 2021; 2021 May 27. (Online ahead of print). PMID: 34045672
  9. Nono D., Bagenda G., Okullo I., Rwenyonyi C.M. Exploring lived experiences on the usage of removable complete dentures among edentulous patients attending Makerere University Dental Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24 (1): 709. PMID: 38898433
  10. Sevbitov A.V., Dorofeev A.E., Utyuzh A.S., Kireev V.V., Zakharova K.E., Emelina E.S., Surkhaev M.M. The influence of adhesive creams on the period of adaptation to removable dentures. Perm Medical Journal. 2024; 5: 75—87 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 74501662
  11. Kano H., et al. Viscosity and adhesion strength of cream-type denture adhesives and mouth moisturizers. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31 (6): 960—8. PMID: 23207201
  12. Mohan S.G., Ramanarayanan V., Raveendran R.K., Chakkiath T. Evaluation of tensile bond strength of indigenously developed hydrogel denture adhesive: An in vitro study. World Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 2: 170—175. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2197
  13. Cristina Alvim G., et al. Evaluation of the antifungal effect and adhesive strength of a denture adhesive supplemented with nystatin. Revista Prevenção de Infecção e Saúde. 2023; 9 (1): 4337. DOI: 10.26694/repis.v9i1.4337
  14. Mokrenko E.V., et al. Evaluation of denture adhesive cream properties depending on the contact area between denture base and oral mucosa. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2021; 2: 137—144 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 48114680
  15. Buyanov E.A., et al. Adhesive means for fixing dentures. Medical and pharmaceutical journal Pulse. 2023; 6: 109—118 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 54121040
  16. Poyurovskaya I.Ya., Polikarpova A.P., Rusanov F.S. Laboratory methods for measuring adhesive bond strength between restoration materials and hard tooth tissues. Stomatology. 2021; 5: 88—95 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 47152103
  17. Abolmasov N.N., et al. Adhesive remedies for dentures. Myths and reality (laboratory research). Stomatology. 2019; 6: 90—95 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 41854862
  18. Kalivradzhiyan E.S., Podoprigora A.V., Kaverina E.Yu., Bobeshko M.N. The paper summarizes data on laboratory and clinical assessment of Corega dent Laboratory and clinical analysis of Corega denture adhesive cream mechanical properties. Stomatology. 2016; 6: 4—8 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 28129569

Received

January 23, 2025

Accepted

August 28, 2025

Published on

September 21, 2025