DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2024_1_6

Experimental assessment of the influence of wear of nano-filled filling materials on the density of the contact point

Authors

  • V.Yu. Shefov 1, postgraduate
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0622-6866
  • L.Yu. Orekhova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Dental therapeutics and periodontology Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8026-0800
  • V.V. Chuev 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Therapeutic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0009-0001-5765-9725
  • O.V. Prokhorova 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Therapeutic dentistry and periodontology Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-2639-1292
  • D.D. Butorina 1, 5th year student at the Dental Faculty
    ORCID ID: 0009-0004-8488-3249
  • 1 Pavlov University, 197022, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • 2 Belgorod State University, 308015, Belgorod, Russia

Abstract

High-quality treatment of caries of the proximal surfaces of the teeth involves not only the anatomical restoration of the contact surface of the tooth, but also the restoration of the necessary interdental pressure to prevent food from entering the interdental spaces. The physiological mobility of teeth during chewing leads to wear of filling materials in the proximal area and increases the risk of the formation of weak contact points, therefore, when restoring class 2 cavities, composite materials with high wear resistance should be used. Aim — to conduct a comparative experimental analysis of the influence of the degree of wear of dental nanocomposites of domestic and foreign production on the amount of pressure in the area of proximal contact.
Materials and methods.
To conduct the study, a test stand was developed and patented, simulating the impact of an adjacent tooth on the material that replaces the proximal wall of the causative tooth. The developed bench was modified with a strain gauge to determine the effect of material wear on the final density of the proximal contact. For a comparative assessment of nanocomposites, representatives of domestic and foreign manufacturers were selected: DentLight Nano (VladMiVa, Russia), Harmonize (Kerr, USA), and Estelite Sigma Quick (Tokuyama, Japan).
Results.
A comparative analysis of the wear of the presented composites did not reveal significant differences in the degree of abrasion of the material. On average, over 10 hours of operation of the stand (simulating 2 years of a filling in the oral cavity), a pressure change of 0.2—0.3 N was recorded. A detailed analysis of the nature and rate of wear showed that the DentLight Nano composite has the best strength characteristics, due to the absence of chip formation on the surface of the restoration.
Conclusion.
Wear of composite materials, regardless of the initial density of the proximal contacts, will lead to a change in the pressure of the contact points of 0.2 N every 2 years. The Dent Light Nano composite material demonstrates optimal wear resistance to horizontal loads, which allows it to be used to restore the proximal walls of teeth in class 2 restorations.

Key words:

nano-composites, wear of materials, contact point

For Citation

[1]
Shefov V.Yu., Orekhova L.Yu., Chuev V.V., Prokhorova O.V., Butorina D.D. Experimental assessment of the influence of wear of nano-filled filling materials on the density of the contact point. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2024; 27 (1): 6—11. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2024_1_6

References

  1. Boushell L.W., Sturdevant J.R. Clinical significance of dental anatomy, histology, physiology, and occlusion. In: Ritter A.V. Sturdevant’s art & science of operative dentistry. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2017. Pp. 12—13. http://tinyurl.com/4wwwv7u5
  2. Orekhova L.Yu., Prokhorova O.V., Shefov V.Yu. Qualitative anatomical restoration of the contact point of teeth — prevention of localized forms of periodontal diseases. Parodontologiya. 2020; 1: 10—15 (In Russian). eLIBRARY ID: 42490430
  3. Manicone P.F., De Angelis P., Rella E., Papetti L., D’Addona A. Proximal contact loss in implant-supported restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence. J Prosthodont. 2022; 31 (3): 201—209. PMID: 34263959
  4. Wirsching E., Loomans B.A., Klaiber B., Dörfer C.E. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 2011; 39 (5): 386—90. PMID: 21414384
  5. El-Shamy H., Saber M.H., Dörfer C.E., El-Badrawy W., Loomans B.A. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2012; 37 (2): 205—10. PMID: 22313267
  6. Deepak S., Nivedhitha M.S. Proximal contact tightness between two different restorative materials — An in vitro study. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research. 2017; 7 (2): 153—156. http://tinyurl.com/4c39zb8b
  7. Southard T.E., Southard K.A., Tolley E.A. Variation of approximal tooth contact tightness with postural change. J Dent Res. 1990; 69 (11): 1776—9. PMID: 2229618
  8. Wong A.T., Wat P.Y., Pow E.H., Leung K.C. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (4): e68—71. PMID: 25914905
  9. Chuang S.F., Su K.C., Wang C.H., Chang C.H. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction. J Dent. 2011; 39 (6): 448—56. PMID: 21504778
  10. Kasahara K., Miura H., Kuriyama M., Kato H., Hasegawa S. Observations of interproximal contact relations during clenching. Int J Prosthodont. 2000; 13 (4): 289—94. PMID: 11203644
  11. Vardimon A.D., Beckmann S., Shpack N., Sarne O., Brosh T. Posterior and anterior components of force during bite loading. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (4): 820—7. PMID: 16697387

Received

October 19, 2023

Accepted

January 30, 2024

Published on

March 21, 2024