DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_2_126

Dental implantation combined with internal sinus-lift and osseodensification techniques using triple-layered maxillary tuberosity autograft in conditions of alveolar bone atrophy: a case report

Downloads

Authors

  • V.A. Badalyan 1, 2, PhD in Medical sciences, full professor of the Dentistry Department; PhD in Medical Sciences, leading researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3885-9358
  • E.A. Levonian 1, postgraduate at the Dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1422-1862
  • A.A. Beglaryan 3, postgraduate at the Pediatric maxillo-facial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1133-5829
  • A.D. Posessor 2, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
    ORCID ID: 0009-0009-9611-8145
  • Z.M. Stapanyan 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • A.I. Zakharova 2, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
    ORCID ID: 0009-0004-4390-7574
  • 1 Sechenov University, 119991, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia
  • 3 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The presented clinical case is aimed to demonstrate the potential and the results of dental implantation combined with internal sinus-lift and osseodensification techniques using triple-layered maxillary tuberosity autograft at the missing tooth 2.5 site. The presented case describes the 48-year-old patient patient with missing tooth (K08.1) and insufficient bone volume rehabilitation performing classic dental implantation. Bone augmentation using maxillary tuberosity triple-layered autograft with soft tissue component with simultaneously implant placement and internal sinus lift combined with ossedensification was carried out. Combination of the described techniques provided less number of surgical procedures and entire implantation treatment morbidity reduction.
Results.
12 months after surgery and prosthetics there were no signs of oral mucosa inflammation.
Conclusion.
The osseodensification technique makes it possible for bone preservation while implant bed preparation, which results in transplanted graft size reduction. Hence, the surgical trauma is minimized. Triple-layered autograft with a soft tissue component harvested from maxillary tuberosity has to be congruent to the defect. Before maxillary tuberosity graft harvesting, it is critical to understand the anatomical features due to the close location of the maxillary sinus in order to avoid its perforation.

Key words:

dental implantation, osseodensification, internal sinus-lift, bone grafting, maxillary tuberosity

For Citation

[1]
Badalyan V.A., Levonian E.A., Beglaryan A.A., Posessor A.D., Stapanyan Z.M., Zakharova A.I. Dental implantation combined with internal sinus-lift and osseodensification techniques using triple-layered maxillary tuberosity autograft in conditions of alveolar bone atrophy: a case report. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2023; 26 (2): 126—131. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_2_126

References

  1. Guo D.N., Liu Y.S., Pan S.X., Wang P.F., Wang B., Liu J.Z., Gao W.H., Zhou Y.S. Clinical efficiency and patient preference of immediate digital impression after implant placement for single implant-supported crown. Chin J Dent Res. 2019; 22 (1): 21—28. PMID: 30746529
  2. Urban I.A., Wessing B., Alández N., Meloni S., González-Martin O., Polizzi G., Sanz-Sanchez I., Montero E., Zechner W. A multicenter randomized controlled trial using a novel collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: Outcome at prosthetic delivery and at 1-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (6): 487—497. PMID: 30927498
  3. Pozzi A., Arcuri L., Carosi P., Nardi A., Kan J. Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single-implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1-year prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021; 32 (12): 1397—1410. PMID: 34467555
  4. Urban I.A., Monje A. Guided bone regeneration in alveolar bone reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019; 31 (2): 331—338. PMID: 30947850
  5. Wessing B., Lettner S., Zechner W. Guided bone regeneration with collagen membranes and particulate graft materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018; 33 (1): 87—100. PMID: 28938035
  6. Ducommun J., El Kholy K., Rahman L., Schimmel M., Chappuis V., Buser D. Analysis of trends in implant therapy at a surgical specialty clinic: Patient pool, indications, surgical procedures, and rate of early failures A 15-year retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019; 30 (11): 1097—1106. PMID: 31400242
  7. Schmidt A.H. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard? Injury. 2021; 52 Suppl 2: S18—S22. PMID: 33563416
  8. Chappuis V., Araújo M.G., Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 73—83. PMID: 28000281
  9. Ana I.D. Bone substituting materials in dental implantology. In: Budihardja A.S., Mücke T. Bone management in dental implantology. Cham: Springer, 2019. Pp. 121—141. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-78951-4_7
  10. Khojasteh A., Nazeman P., Tolstunov L. Tuberosity-alveolar block as a donor site for localised augmentation of the maxilla: a retrospective clinical study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 54 (8): 950—955. PMID: 27453038
  11. Tolstunov L. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft: innovative technique and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67 (8): 1723—9. PMID: 19615588
  12. da Rosa J.C.M. Immediate dentoalveolar restoration in compromised sockets: Technique and bone biology. In: Manakil J. Periodontology and dental implantology. IntechOpen, 2018. Pp. 181—194. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.78619
  13. da Rosa J.C.M., Sotto-Maior B.S., Pértile de Oliveira Rosa A.C., Violin Dias Pereira L.A. Clinical, tomographic, and histologic evaluation of an autogenous bone graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity for guided bone regeneration: Case report with a 4-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021; 41 (4): e183-e190. PMID: 34328484
  14. Huwais S., Meyer E.G. A Novel osseous densification approach in implant osteotomy preparation to increase biomechanical primary stability, bone mineral density, and bone-to-implant contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 (1): 27—36. PMID: 27741329
  15. Lafzi A., Atarbashi-Moghadam F., Amid R., Sijanivandi S. Different techniques in transalveolar maxillary sinus elevation: A literature review. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2021; 13 (1): 35—42. PMID: 35919916
  16. Petrocelli M., Sbordone C., Salzano G., Dell’Aversana Orabona G., Cassandro F.M., Scarpa A., Ramaglia L., Iaconetta G., Califano L., Cassandro E. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after oral and maxillofacial surgery: Our experience and review of literature. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020; 19 (4): 527—531. PMID: 33071500
  17. Pai U.Y., Rodrigues S.J., Talreja K.S., Mundathaje M. Osseodensification A novel approach in implant dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18 (3): 196—200. PMID: 30111907
  18. Slete F.B., Olin P., Prasad H. Histomorphometric comparison of 3 osteotomy techniques. Implant Dent. 2018; 27 (4): 424—428. PMID: 29762184

Downloads

Received

March 11, 2023

Accepted

May 21, 2023

Published on

July 6, 2023