DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2023_1_114

Morphological and morphometric variations of the lower jaw: an observational typology

Authors

  • H.M. Darawsheh 1, researcher, maxillofacial surgeon
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1899-1282
  • R.V. Mellin 2, 3, postgraduate at the Maxillofacial surgery and general dentistry Department; head of the Maxillofacial and reconstructive plastic surgery Division, chief external maxillofacial surgeon of the Republic of Khakassia
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1587-0581
  • Z.B. Aydemirova 4, 6th year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8822-2163
  • A.M. Vorobeva 4, 6th year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6935-3478
  • V.Yu. Rud 4, 6th year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7612-1795
  • E.S. Voynova 4, 6th year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0114-9099
  • M.S. Orlenko 4, 6th year student
  • S. Podiezhikh 4, 6th year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7167-836X
  • S.A. Volodchenko 4, 6th year student
  • S.A. Tregubov 1, 3rd year student
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7315-8237
  • V.V. Tatarkin 4, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Surgical and Clinical Anatomy Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9599-3935
  • Yu.L. Vasil'ev 1, 5, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Operative surgery and topographic anatomy Department; professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3541-6068
  • 1 Sechenov University, 119435, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Novokuznetsk State Institute for Advanced Medical Training, 654005, Novokuznetsk, Russia
  • 3 Republican Clinical Hospital, 655012, Abakan, Russia
  • 4 Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, 195015, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
  • 5 Kazan State Medical University, 420012, Kazan, Russia

Abstract

The anatomical and morphological structure of the mandible varies significantly among populations and depends largely on many factors such as developmental process, and on concomitant and past diseases, respectively. The purpose of this study was to analyze the morphometric characteristics of the condylar, coronoid processes and the mandibular notch, respectively. >. This study was conducted on certified anatomical material. The study included 49 mandibles. Measurements were conducted on the mandibles using a caliper and a depth gauge. The following parameters were analyzed: for the condylar process (CdP) — shape, width in transverse and sagittal sections, thickness and length of the base, height; for the coronoid process (CrP) — height, length and thickness of the base, shape; for cutting — shape, width, and depth. >. The average age of male and female mandibles was 72.31±2.25 and 74.15±2.34, respectively. The difference between the age of male and female mandibles was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In female mandibles, a lower CdP height was observed (on the right — p=0.028; on the left — p=0.036). In male mandibles, on an average, larger morphometric indicators of CdP were noted. It was noted that with oval CdP there was a lower height of the CrP on the right than with other forms of CdP (p<0.05). The triangular shape of the CrP was the most common, both on the right and left sides, respectively. Most often, a round notch was observed on both sides. >. Our study showed gender differences in its structure of the condylar, coronoid process and mandibular notch, respectively. In male sample, on an average, larger morphometric indicators of MO and CrP were noted. The depth of the tenderloin in female sample was less, and the width was almost the same as the male.

Key words:

morphometric study, morphological study, condylar process, coronoid process, mandibular notch

For Citation

[1]
Darawsheh H.M., Mellin R.V., Aydemirova Z.B., Vorobeva A.M., Rud V.Yu., Voynova E.S., Orlenko M.S., Podiezhikh S., Volodchenko S.A., Tregubov S.A., Tatarkin V.V., Vasil’ev Yu.L. Morphological and morphometric variations of the lower jaw: an observational typology. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2023; 26 (1): 114—120. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2023_1_114

References

  1. Vasil'ev Y., Paulsen F., Dydykin S. Anatomical and radiological features of the bone organization of the anterior part of the mandible. Ann Anat. 2020; 231: 151512. PMID: 32240730
  2. Rusu M.C., Pop F., Leonardi R., Motoc A.G., Jianu A.M. Morphologic features of the fetal mandibular condyle: layers, canals and microvascular pattern. Ann Anat. 2011; 193 (5): 436—46. PMID: 21530206
  3. Reicheneder C., Kardari Z., Proff P., Fanghaenel J., Faltermeier A., Römer P. Correlation of condylar kinematics in children with gender, facial type and weight. Ann Anat. 2013; 195 (3): 243—7. PMID: 23484954
  4. Chin K.J., Lirk P., Hollmann M.W., Schwarz S.K.W. Mechanisms of action of fascial plane blocks: a narrative review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021; 46 (7): 618—628. PMID: 34145073
  5. Predoiu M., Rusu M.C., Chiriţă A.L. A rare anatomic variation: Triple mental foramina. Morphologie. 2019; 103 (341 Pt 2): 110—115. PMID: 31103465
  6. Wu Z., Wang Y. Development of guidance techniques for regional anesthesia: Past, present and future. J Pain Res. 2021; 14: 1631—1641. PMID: 34135627
  7. Darawsheh H.M., Vasil'ev Yu.L., Kashtanov A.D., Lyakisheva A.A., Lezhnev D.A., Panin A.M. X-ray anatomical provement of the right trajectory choice during mandible regional anaesthesia. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2022; 2: 5—12. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48577685
  8. Darawsheh H.M., Vasil'ev U.L., Panin A.M., Kuznetsov A.I., Heigetyan A.V., Karammaeva M.R. Morphometric study of the condylar process of the mandible. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2022; 2: 28—33. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 48679071
  9. Bielecki-Kowalski B., Kozakiewicz M. Clinico-anatomical classification of the processus condylaris mandibulae for traumatological purposes. Ann Anat. 2021; 234: 151616. PMID: 33098979
  10. Kharoshah M.A., Almadani O., Ghaleb S.S., Zaki M.K., Fattah Y.A. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010; 17 (4): 213—5. PMID: 20382358
  11. Mérida-Velasco J.R., Rodríguez-Vázquez J.F., De La Cuadra C., Mérida-Velasco J.A., Jiménez-Collado J. The course of the buccal nerve: relationships with the temporalis muscle during the prenatal period. J Anat. 2001; 198 (Pt 4): 423—9. PMID: 11327204
  12. Merrot O., Vacher C., Merrot S., Godlewski G., Frigard B., Goudot P. Changes in the edentate mandible in the elderly. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005; 27 (4): 265—70. PMID: 16215657
  13. Zurowski R., Gosek M., Aleksandrowicz R. Dimensions and geometry of the temporomandibular joint and masseter muscles. Pol Med Sci Hist Bull (1973). 1976; 15 (3): 291—5. PMID: 995764
  14. Théophile M., Jean-François D., Emilie F., Etienne S., Muriel B. Contribution of anatomical criteria to surgical approach for treatment of bilateral coronoid hyperplasia. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 123 (6): 597—600. PMID: 35691557
  15. Ishwarkumar S., Pillay P., De-Gama B.Z., Satyapal K.S. Osteometric and radiological study of the mandibular notch. International Journal of Morphology. 2019; 37 (2): 491—497. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022019000200491
  16. Schönegg D., Ferrari R., Ebner J., Blumer M., Lanzer M., Gander T. Proximity of the middle meningeal artery and maxillary artery to the mandibular head and mandibular neck as revealed by three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 26 (1): 139—146. PMID: 34024006
  17. Odaka K., Matsunaga S. Course of the maxillary vein and its positional relationship with the mandibular ramus require attention during mandibuloplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31 (3): 861—864. PMID: 31842072
  18. Anisuzzaman M.M., Khan S.R., Khan M.T.I., Abdullah M.K., Afrin A. Evaluation of mandibular condylar morphology by orthopantomogram in Bangladeshi population. Update Dental College Journal. 2019; 9 (1): 29—31. DOI: 10.3329/updcj.v9i1.41203
  19. Maia F.P.A., de Sousa Filho G.C., Pacífico F.A., Albuquerque L.C.A., de Melo Vasconcelos A.F., do Egito Vasconcelos B.C. Proximity of the maxillary artery to the neck of the mandibular condyle: anatomical study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 23 (4): 423—427. PMID: 31278592
  20. Coombs M.C., Bonthius D.J., Nie X., Lecholop M.K., Steed M.B., Yao H. Effect of measurement technique on TMJ mandibular condyle and articular disc morphometry: CBCT, MRI, and physical measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (1): 42—53. PMID: 30076808
  21. Agudelo M., Ortiz M., Herrera A. Condylar morphometry in adults with sagittal intermaxillary relationship class I, II and III using cone beam computed tomography in a Colombian population. Morphologie. 2022; 106 (355): 287—293. PMID: 34600835
  22. Aqeel Al-Saedi I.L., Al-Taee R., Al-Jasim N.H., Al-Bakhakh B. A panoramic study of the morphology of mandibular condyle in a sample of population from Basrah city. International Journal of Morphology. 2020; 38 (6): 1707—1712. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022020000601707
  23. Jeon K.J., Han S.S., Lee C., Choi Y.J., Jung H.I., Kim Y.H. Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 49 (8): 20190467. PMID: 32348170
  24. Singh S., Bavle R.M., Konda P., Venugopal R., Bopaiah S., Kumar S. Assessment of the most reliable sites in mandibular bone for the best deoxyribonucleic acid yield for expeditive human identification in forensics. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017; 21 (3): 447—453. PMID: 29391725
  25. Chrcanovic B.R., Abreu M.H., Custódio A.L. Morphological variation in dentate and edentulous human mandibles. Surg Radiol Anat. 2011; 33 (3): 203—13. PMID: 20878404
  26. Ayyıldız E., Orhan M., Bahşi İ., Yalçin E.D. Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021; 43 (6): 975—996. PMID: 33221971
  27. Manoj M., Mathew L., Natarajan S., Yellapurkar S., Shetty S., Denny C., Dahal S. Morphometric anlaysis of mandibular coronoid, condyle and sigmoid shape using panoromic view for personal identification in south Indian population. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2022; 12: 25. PMID: 35673587

Received

December 24, 2022

Accepted

February 17, 2023

Published on

March 22, 2023