DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2022_2_132

Hygiene index, intensity of caries and severity of gingivitis in patients with various orthopedic restorations

Downloads

Authors

  • E.O. Bochkovskaya 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant at the Pediatric dentistry Derartment
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3064-6972
  • 1 Mechnikov North-West State Medical University, 195067, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Dental prosthetics is developing very actively and now there are more and more materials for dental restoration in the arsenal of a dentist. Artificial crowns are made on the basis of zirconium dioxide, cobalt-chromium alloy or as all-ceramic structures. The study of the effect of these restorations on oral health lags far behind the study of the evaluation of their effectiveness. The aim is to clarify the index of oral hygiene, clinical signs of gingivitis and the intensity of dental caries in patients with various types of orthopedic structures in the oral cavity.
Materials and methods.
The study involved 50 patients aged 18 to 40 years (average age - 28.7 years), equally men and women. They were divided into 3 groups according to the type of artificial crowns in the oral cavity: I - patients with metal-ceramic crowns (n=18), II - patients with ceramic crowns (n=19), III - patients with crowns based on zirconium dioxide (n=13). The comparison group (IV) consisted of 19 people without artificial crowns. The hygiene index according to O’Leary, CPI index, pH of oral fluid, PMA index, SHS index were determined.
Results.
The O’Leary hygiene index in patients with ceramic-metal crowns was 93.76±4.65, in patients with zirconium crowns - 48.18±4.65. The PMA index in patients with ceramic-metal crowns was 47.12±4.15, in patients with zirconium crowns - 31.18±4.32. The analysis of SHS in patients with cermet crowns was 4.34±1.02, in patients with zirconium crowns - 0.32±0.82.
Conclusion.
The oral hygiene index according to the O’Leary and SHS indices in patients with zirconium dioxide crowns is significantly better than in patients with metal-ceramic and ceramic crowns. The intensity of caries and the pH of the oral fluid in patients with different types of crowns in the oral cavity has no significant differences. The values of the PMA index in patients with zirconium dioxide crowns were significantly lower compared to similar indicators in patients with metal-ceramic and ceramic crowns.

Key words:

oral hygiene, caries, crowns, zirconia, gingivitis

For Citation

[1]
Bochkovskaya E.O. Hygiene index, intensity of caries and severity of gingivitis in patients with various orthopedic restorations. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2022; 25 (2): 132—137. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_2_132

References

  1. Smirnova L.E., Bochkovskaya E.O. Examination of orthopedic dental care quality. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2017; 3 (83): 72—77 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29960550
  2. Bochkovskaia E.O. Role and significance of medical documentation for dental care quality review. Literature review (part 1). Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2017; 2 (82): 74—79 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29276243
  3. Kursekov K.A. Factors physiological adaptation to orthopedic constructions. Scientific Review. Medical sciences. 2017; 3: 47—50 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 28769800
  4. Parshin Yu.V., Sapronova O.N., Medvedev A.Yu. Features of prosthetic treatment with metalceramic and all-ceramic artificial crowns and bridges (literature review). The Dental Institute. 2013; 1 (58): 87—89 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22134621
  5. Lebedenko I.Yu., Khvan V.I., Deyev M.S., Lebedenko A.I. Experience in the use of zirconium dioxide in dentistry. Part. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2008; 5: 60—64 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 11679036
  6. Lebedenko I.Yu., Khvan V.I., Deyev M.S., Lebedenko A.I. Zirconium, zircon, and zirconium dioxide. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2008; 4: 50—54 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 11682862
  7. Zakharov D.Z. Modern ceramic materials used in prosthetic stomatology for dentures making. Stomatology. 2009; 2: 80—82 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 13332470
  8. Zholudev D.S. Ceramic materials in prosthetic dentistry. Ceramic based on aluminum oxide (review). Actual Problems in Dentistry. 2012; 5: 8—14 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18267543
  9. Lanina O.A., Lebedenko A.I., Rumyantsev M.A., Khvan V.I. The accuracy of the conformity of the supporting crowns of whole-ceramic dental prostheses. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2007; 4: 8—10 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 9566506
  10. Trezubov V.N., Sapronova O.N., Kolesov O.Y., Rozov R.A., Petrakov D.S., Kusevitsky L.Ya. Clinical complications of prosthetics with fixed structures. The Dental Institute. 2007; 3 (36): 44—45 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 15267545
  11. Grivet M., Morrier J.J., Benay G., Barsotti O. Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000; 11 (10): 637—42. PMID: 15348088
  12. Hahnel S., Rosentritt M., Handel G., Bürgers R. Surface characterization of dental ceramics and initial streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Dent Mater. 2009; 25 (8): 969—75. PMID: 19278720
  13. Nabert-Georgi C., Rodloff A.C., Jentsch H., Reissmann D.R., Schaumann R., Stingu C.S. Influence of oral bacteria on adhesion of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis to dental materials. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018; 4 (3): 72—77. PMID: 29955390
  14. Lebedenko I.Yu., Kitkina T.B., Dubova L.V., Vavilova T.P. Evaluation of the state of the marginal gum in the vicinity of the abutment teeth of the patients using for a long time unremovable metalloceramic constructions based on the alloys of noble and base metals. Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2011; 6: 13—16 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17260271
  15. Volozhin A.I., Denisov A.B., Lebedenko I.Yu., Dubova L.V., Diyeva S.V., Kitkina T.B., Mikhaylova A.N. Adaptation reactions of patients to dental-maxillary bridges in tooth replacement (biochemical and immunological aspects)). Russian Journal of Dentistry. 2004; 1: 4—9 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17108202
  16. Stafeyev A.A., Zinovyev G.I. Biofilm on the border of the tooth structure fixing material (cement) constructive material. The Dental Institute. 2012; 2 (55): 76—77 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 17994865
  17. Lutskaya I.K., Schaveleva M.V., Zinovenko O.G. Optimization of patient dental health rating in the presence of artificial dental crowns. Issues of organization and informatization of healthcare. 2014; 2 (79): 67—71 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29925572
  18. Babaeva P.R. The character and the level of morbidity of mucous membrane, marginal periodontium, osseous hard tissues at different types and methods of orthopedic devices production. Dentistry bulletin. 2011; 1 (74): 64—66 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 22823022
  19. Ippolitov E.V., Nikolaeva E.N., Tsarev V.N. Oral biofilm: inductors of congenital immunity signal pathways. Stomatology. 2017; 4: 58—62 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 29910294
  20. Tets G.V., Vikina D.S., Vecherkovskaia M.F., Domorad A.A., Kharlamova V.V., Tets V.V. New approaches to oral cavity opportunistic microbiota study. Stomatology. 2013; 1: 14—16 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 18876275
  21. Jalalian E., Mostofi S., Shafiee E., Nourizadeh A., Nargesi R. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to zirconia, titanium alloy and some other restorative materials: “An in-vitro study”. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine. 2014; 3 (2): 13—9. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.abcmed.15.03.02.04
  22. Abbas I., Sara H., Zuryati G. Bacterial adhesion on zirconia, lithium desilicated and gold crowns—in vivo study. Advances in Dentistry & Oral Health. 2016; 1 (5): 555574. DOI: 10.19080/adoh.2016.01.555574
  23. Lee B.C., Jung G.Y., Kim D.J., Han J.S. Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3 (2): 81—4. PMID: 21814616
  24. Scarano A., Assenza B., Piattelli M., Iezzi G., Leghissa G.C., Quaranta A., Tortora P., Piattelli A. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol. 2005; 31 (6): 269—75. PMID: 16447899
  25. Rimondini L., Cerroni L., Carrassi A., Torricelli P. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17 (6): 793—8. PMID: 12507238
  26. Souza J.C., Mota R.R., Sordi M.B., Passoni B.B., Benfatti C.A., Magini R.S. Biofilm Formation on Different Materials Used in Oral Rehabilitation. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27 (2): 141—7. PMID: 27058375
  27. Scarano A., Piattelli M., Caputi S., Favero G.A., Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol. 2004; 75 (2): 292—6. PMID: 15068118
  28. Manicone P.F., Rossi Iommetti P., Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007; 35 (11): 819—26. PMID: 17825465
  29. Meier R., Hauser-Gerspach I., Lüthy H., Meyer J. Adhesion of oral streptococci to all-ceramics dental restorative materials in vitro. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008; 19 (10): 3249—53. PMID: 18470704
  30. Rosentritt M., Behr M., Bürgers R., Feilzer A.J., Hahnel S. In vitro adherence of oral streptococci to zirconia core and veneering glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 91 (1): 257—63. PMID: 19388092
  31. Severina T.V., Ovcharenko E.S. Features of growth of tooth biophenics depending on the quality of final treatment of composite restoration surface. Parodontologiya. 2018; 4 (89): 48—54 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 37045908
  32. Bottino M.A., Pereira S., Amaral M., Milhan N., Pereira C.A., Camargo S., Carvalho A., Melo R.M. Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation and Cell Viability on Polymer-infiltrated Ceramic and Yttria-stabilized Polycrystalline Zirconium Dioxide Ceramic. Oper Dent. 2019; 44 (6): E271-E278. PMID: 31373891
  33. Satygo E.A., Limina A.P. Indication of plaque using camera VistaCam. International Dental Review. 2019; 4 (89): 33—35 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 41510288
  34. Ivanova M.A., Makarova M.V., Vasilyev E., Aleksandrov M.T., Pashkov E.P. Rapid identification of mycobacteria using laser fluorescence. Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2009; 3: 81—85 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 23087710

Downloads

Received

February 19, 2022

Accepted

May 10, 2022

Published on

June 1, 2022