Shear bond strength of glass ionomer luting cements: an in vitro study

Downloads

Authors

  • A.A. Romanenko 1, 2, junior researcher; postgraduate at the Glass and ceramics technology Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0103-3758
  • A.A. Buzov 1, PhD in Engineering, technical director
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8897-0076
  • V.P. Chuev 1, 2, 3, Grand PhD in Engineering, general director; professor of the Glass and Ceramics Technology Department; head of the Medical and technical systems Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1033-0789
  • 1 “VladMiVa Experimental Plant” JSC, 308023, Belgorod, Russia
  • 2 Belgorod State Technological University, 308015, Belgorod, Russia
  • 3 Belgorod State University, 308015, Belgorod, Russia

Abstract

An assessment and comparison has been carried out for the shear bond strength of 8 popular dental luting glass ionomer cements (GIC) to tooth dentin and construction materials of fixed dentures: zirconia and cobalt-chromium alloy after preparation by RosBel diamond bur (VladMiVa, Russia) and sandblasting by Belekt abrasive electrocorundum powders (VladMiVa, Russia).
Materials and methods.
The patented method was used to evaluation of the shear bond strength of traditional (Cemion-F, Fuji I, Meron, Ketac Cem Easymix), water-mixable (Orthofix-Aqua S, Aqua Meron), as well as polymer-modified GIC (Fuji PLUS, Relyx Luting) to dentin and construction materials of fixed dentures: zirconia Estker (VladMiVa) and cobalt-chromium alloy Starbond CoS (Scheftner Dental Alloys). For an empirical assessment of the surface of materials, tools and products, images were taken using scanning electron microscopy.
Results.
No differences were found among the domestic and foreign traditional zirconia cements for fixation of zirconia constructions; their adhesion varies from 6.087 to 6.723 MPa. Water-bonding GIC were characterized by lower values of 3.007 and 4.151 MPa. When fixing cobalt-chromium alloy, the best results were obtained with Cemion-F, Meron and Fuji I (11.668; 10.525 and 11.775 MPa, respectively), while Ketac Cem Easymix and water-bonded GIC had 1.4-1.5 times lower adhesion. Among polymer-modified GICs, Fuji PLUS had 2.8 times higher adhesion to zirconium dioxide (18.777 vs 6.712 MPa, p<0.001) and 2.2 times higher adhesion to cobalt-chromium alloy (15.895 vs 7.108, p<0.015) compared to Relyx Luting. The lowest adhesion to dentin was found for Ketac Cem Easymix (0.829 MPa) and the highest for Fuji PLUS (5.214 MPa).
Conclusions.
 In most cases it is preferable to use traditional GIC (Cemion-F, Meron and Fuji I) due to low adhesion of water-borne cements. Of the polymer-modified GICs for fixation of fixed orthopedic structures we recommend Fuji PLUS with the highest adhesion to both the structural materials and dentin. Relyx Luting modified polymer does not have this advantage over conventional GIC.

Key words:

dental glass ionomer luting cement, shear bond strength, zirconia, cobalt-chrome alloy, dentin

For Citation

[1]
Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.P. Shear bond strength of glass ionomer luting cements: an in vitro study. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 24 (3): 112—118

References

  1. Özcan M., Bernasconi M. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17 (1): 7—26. PMID: 25646166
  2. Dogan S., Raigrodski A.J. Cementation of zirconia-based toothborne restorations: A clinical review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019; 40 (8): 536—540. PMID: 31478701
  3. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Polovneva L.V., Chuev V.P. Zinc phosphate cements is a new possibilities of fixation in orthopedic dentistry. Part 1. Physical and mechanical characteristics. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2019; 3 (91): 10—15 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2019_3_10
  4. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.P., Shchelokova L.S. Polycarboxylate cements is a new possibilities of fixation in orthopedic dentistry. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020; 1 (93): 70—75 (In Russ.). DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_70
  5. Lüthy H., Loeffel O., Hammerle C.H. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater. 2006; 22 (2): 195—200. PMID: 16143382
  6. Uo M., Sjögren G., Sundh A., Goto M., Watari F., Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J. 2006; 25 (3): 626—31. PMID: 17076338
  7. Tsuyuki Y., Sato T., Nomoto S., Yotsuya M., Koshihara T., Takemoto S., Yoshinari M. Effect of occlusal groove on abutment, crown thickness, and cement-type on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns. Dent Mater J. 2018; 37 (5): 843—850. PMID: 29962415
  8. de Oyagüe R.C., Monticelli F., Toledano M., Osorio E., Ferrari M., Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater. 2009; 25 (2): 172—9. PMID: 18620746
  9. De Angelis F., D.'Arcangelo C., Buonvivere M., Rondoni G.D., Vadini M. Shear bond strength of glass ionomer and resin-based cements to different types of zirconia. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32 (8): 806—814. PMID: 32810368
  10. Pacifici E., Chazine M., Vichi A., Grandini S., Goracci C., Ferrari M. Shear-bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable restorative material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013; 38 (2): 149—54. PMID: 24683779
  11. Poorzandpoush K., Shahrabi M., Heidari A., Hosseinipour Z.S. Shear bond strength of self-adhesive flowable composite, conventional flowable composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement to primary dentin. Front Dent. 2019; 16 (1): 62—68. PMID: 31608338
  12. Scaminaci Russo D., Pierleoni F., Buti J., Ferrari M., Giachetti L. In vitro comparison of bonding effectiveness of different adhesive strategies. Am J Dent. 2014; 27 (6): 323—9. PMID: 25707087
  13. Pilo R., Agar-Zoizner S., Gelbard S., Levartovsky S. The retentive strength of laser-sintered cobalt-chromium-based crowns after pretreatment with a desensitizing paste containing 8% arginine and calcium carbonate. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19 (12): 4082. PMID: 30562955
  14. Pattanaik B.K., Nagda S.J. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23 (1): 20—5. PMID: 22842244
  15. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.P., Mulchin M.A., Kopytov A.A. Method of determining strength of dental material connection for fixation with hard tooth tissues and non-removable dental prosthesis material and device for its implementation. Patent RU № 2740252, effective from 19.08.2020 (In Russ.).
  16. Ozer F., Pak-Tunc E., Esen Dagli N., Ramachandran D., Sen D., Blatz M.B. Shear bond strength of luting cements to fixed superstructure metal surfaces under various seating forces. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018; 10 (5): 340—346. PMID: 30370024
  17. Abdelaziz K.M., Al-Qahtani N.M., Al-Shehri A.S., Abdelmoneam A.M. Bonding quality of contemporary dental cements to sandblasted esthetic crown copings. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012; 3 (2): 142—7. PMID: 22522951
  18. Techa-Ungkul C., Sakoolnamarka R. The effect of dentin age on the microshear bond strength and microleakage of glass-ionomer cements. Gerodontology. 2021; 38 (3): 259—266. PMID: 33354808
  19. Hoshika S., Ting S., Ahmed Z., Chen F., Toida Y., Sakaguchi N., Van Meerbeek B., Sano H., Sidhu S.K. Effect of conditioning and 1 year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin. Dent Mater. 2021; 37 (1): 106—112. PMID: 33229039
  20. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Chuev V.V., Fadeeva D.A., Kazakova V.S. Loading device for producing samples of dental fixing material. Patent RU № 199739, effective from 18.05.2020 (In Russ.).
  21. Romanenko A.A., Buzov A.A., Ryzhova I.P., Maksimova V.M., Fadeeva D.A., Kazakova V.S. Basis of loading device for producing samples of dental fixing material. Patent RU № 199620, effective from 19.05.2020 (In Russ.).
  22. L.E. Minh., Larsson C., Papia E. Bond strength between MDP-based cement and translucent zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2019; 38 (3): 480—489. PMID: 31105161
  23. Salem R.S.T., Ozkurt-Kayahan Z., Kazazoglu E. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strength of three primer/resin cement systems to monolithic zirconia. Int J Prosthodont. 2019; 32 (6): 519—525. PMID: 31664268
  24. Zhao L., Jian Y.T., Wang X.D., Zhao K. Bond strength of primer/cement systems to zirconia subjected to artificial aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116 (5): 790—796. PMID: 27312655
  25. Manuja N., Pandit I.K., Srivastava N., Gugnani N., Nagpal R. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011; 29 (1): 7—13. PMID: 21521911
  26. Altintas S.H., Hamiyet K., Kilic S. Effect of surface treatments to remove temporary cement remnants on the bond strength between the core composite and resin cement. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019; 22 (10): 1441—1447. PMID: 31607737
  27. Saikaew P., Matsumoto M., Sattabanasuk V., Harnirattisai C., Carvalho R.M., Sano H. Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020; 128 (3): 246—254. PMID: 32396258
  28. Stallings M.T., Stoeckel D.C., Rawson K.G., Welch D.B. Significant shear bond strength improvements of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement with a resin coating. Gen Dent. 2017; 65 (1): 75—78. PMID: 28068271
  29. Kong Y.Y., Chen Y., Shen R., Jiang Q.Z., Chen M.L. Influence of thermocycling on shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement to Er: YAG laser-prepared enamel. Lasers Surg Med. 2016; 48 (10): 978—984. PMID: 26660943
  30. Alves M., Campos F., Bergoli C.D., Bottino M.A., Özcan M., Souza R. Effect of adhesive cementation strategies on the bonding of Y-TZP to human dentin. Oper Dent. 2016; 41 (3): 276—83. PMID: 26509232
  31. Quigley N.P., Loo D.S.S., Choy C., Ha W.N. Clinical efficacy of methods for bonding to zirconia: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2021; 125 (2): 231—240. PMID: 32115220
  32. Poggio C., Beltrami R., Scribante A., Colombo M., Lombardini M. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2014; 5 (1): 15—22. PMID: 24753797
  33. Somani R., Jaidka S., Singh D.J., Sibal G.K. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various glass ionomer cements to dentin of primary teeth: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016; 9 (3): 192—196. PMID: 27843248
  34. Carvalho T.S., van Amerongen W.E., de Gee A., Bönecker M., Sampaio F.C. Shear bond strengths of three glass ionomer cements to enamel and dentine. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16 (3): e406—10. PMID: 20526266

Downloads

Received

August 18, 2021

Accepted

September 6, 2021

Published on

September 1, 2021