The elimination method of total Schneiderian membrane perforation during subantral augmentation by lateral aproach. Clinical case

Authors

  • N.S. Skichko 1, resident at the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-0633-7299
  • R.F. Muhametshin 1, assistant at the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6975-7018
  • S.S. Ivanov 1, resident at the Oral and maxillofacial surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4058-1706
  • A.P. Kutsenko 2, dentistry surgeon
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5590-4125
  • 1 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Stavropol State Medical University, 355017, Stavropol, Russia

Abstract

The aim was to show the possibility of using the technique to eliminate the total Schneiderian membrane rupture during sinus lifting with lateral approach surgery by fixing the collagen membrane to the medial parts of the maxillary sinus (MS) combined with bone-plastic material augmentation.
Materials and methods.
Preoperative medication included 2000 mg of amoxicillin clavulanate per os, intramuscular injections of dexamethasone (8 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and etamsylate (500 mg). sinus lifting with lateral approach was performed using the grind-out technique with a piezo-surgical handpiece. Cortical bone powder was taken in the place where the bone window was formed. To eliminate the mucous membrane defect, 2 artificial perforations were made in the palatine process of the maxilla, through which a collagen membrane Bioplast-Dent 30×40 mm was fixed with resorbable suture material Vicryl 4-0. One-stage split-osteotomy was performed to increase the width of the alveolar ridge. The subantral space and split area were filled with a mixture of bone powder and Bioplast-Dent bone collagen in a 1:1 ratio. The wound was hermetically sutured. Postoperative appointments and recommendations were given taking into account the risk of sinusitis development.
Results.
A control CT scan 12 months after surgery confirmed absence of inflammatory changes in the MS and migration of the bone-plastic material. The density of the newly formed bone did not differ from the normal cancellous bone. The alveolar height in the area of teeth 2.4, 2.6 and 2.7 was at least 11.2 mm and the alveolar width from 6.4 mm, which proved to be sufficient for implantation. The control OPG examination 24 months after implant placing demonstrated the stability of the achieved bone parameters at the routine check-up.
Conclusions.
The proposed technique for elimination of extensive mucosal defects of the maxillary sinuses confirmed its effectiveness even 3 years after surgery. However, this clinical case should be considered as a special case due to the lack of statistical data.

Key words:

sinus lifting, subantral augmentation, Shneiderian membrane perforation, dental implantation

For Citation

[1]
Skichko N.S., Muhametshin R.F., Ivanov S.S., Kutsenko A.P. The elimination method of total Schneiderian membrane perforation during subantral augmentation by lateral aproach. Clinical case. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 24 (3): 78—84

References

  1. Wang H.L., Katranji A. ABC sinus augmentation classification. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008; 28 (4): 383—9. PMID: 18717377
  2. Wen S.C., Lin Y.H., Yang Y.C., Wang H.L. The influence of sinus membrane thickness upon membrane perforation during transcrestal sinus lift procedure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (10): 1158—64. PMID: 24891094
  3. Nolan P.J., Freeman K., Kraut R.A. Correlation between Schneiderian membrane perforation and sinus lift graft outcome: a retrospective evaluation of 359 augmented sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72 (1): 47—52. PMID: 24071378
  4. Jensen O.T. (ed.) The sinus bone graft. Chicago: Quittessence, 1999. Pp. 201—208.
  5. Al-Dajani M. Incidence, risk factors, and complications of Schneiderian membrane perforation in sinus lift surgery: A meta-analysis. Implant Dent. 2016; 25 (3): 409—15. PMID: 26974034
  6. Ivanov S.Ju., Muraev A.A., Jamurkova N.F., Migura S.A. Surgical tactics for mucosal perforation of the maxillary sinus arising during sinus elevator surgery. Stomatologičeskij žurnal. 2009; 2: 176—178 (In Russ.). http: //www.dentaljournal.by/archive/68/483.html
  7. Ivanov S.Ju., Jamurkova N.F., Muraev A.A., Migura S.A. Elimination of Shneider’s membrane defects arising during sinus lifting operation. Stomatology. 2010; 2 (89): 48—51 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 16599406
  8. Ivanov S.Ju., Jamurkova N.F., Muraev A.A., Migura S.A. Use of platelet poor plasma for elimination of Shneider’s membrane defects arising during sinus lifting. Stomatology. 2010; 2 (89): 52—56 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 16599408
  9. Tavelli L., Borgonovo A.E., Re D., Maiorana C. Sinus presurgical evaluation: a literature review and a new classification proposal. Minerva Stomatol. 2017; 66 (3): 115—31. PMID: 28206730
  10. von Arx T., Fodich I., Bornstein M.M., Jensen S.S. Perforation of the sinus membrane during sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study of frequency and possible risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 (3): 718—26. PMID: 24818213
  11. Becker S.T., Terheyden H., Steinriede A., Behrens E., Springer I., Wiltfang J. Prospective observation of 41 perforations of the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19 (12): 1285—9. PMID: 19040444
  12. Barbu H.M., Iancu S.A., Mirea I.J., Mignogna M.D., Samet N., Calvo-Guirado J.L. Management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus augmentation procedures: A preliminary comparison of two different approaches. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (9): 1491. PMID: 31546766
  13. Kim Y.K., Hwang J.W., Yun P.Y. Closure of large perforation of sinus membrane using pedicled buccal fat pad graft: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23 (6): 1139—42. PMID: 19216286

Received

May 26, 2021

Accepted

July 27, 2021

Published on

September 1, 2021