Possibilities of psychological and psychiatric rehabilitation of adult patients after orthognatic surgery

Authors

  • R.I. Slabkovsky 1, senior laboratory technician at the Orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6884-8620
  • N.S. Drobysheva 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5612-3451
  • A.B. Slabkovskaya 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, teaching professor of the Orthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8154-5093
  • A.Yu. Drobyshev 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Maxillofacial and plastic surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1710-6923
  • V.E. Medvedev 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, assistant professor and head of the Psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychosomatic pathology Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8653-596X
  • M.O. Uspenskaya 2, Clinical resident of the Psychiatry, psychotherapy and psychosomatic pathology Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0780-8796
  • 1 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 RUDN University, 117198, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Currently, orthognathic treatment of patients with skeletal forms of occlusion anomalies is becoming more widespread. It allows in a short time to change not only the function of the dentition, but also the patient’s appearance, which also affects his psycho-emotional state. The psychological status of the patient is of great importance, especially after surgery due to the difficulties associated with physical recovery. Recently, we began to pay attention to the methods of patient rehabilitation, which have a positive effect on the patient’s condition. Purpose and objectives of the study: to assess the impact of rehabilitation methods for adult patients after orthognathic surgery on the psychoemotional state of patients.
Materials and methods.
42 patients (33 women, 9 men) aged 18—55 years, who underwent the orthodontic, surgical and rehabilitation stages of combined treatment, were examined. Patient examination methods included psychometric method using validated scales and statistical analysis. During the psychometric examination, a battery of scales and questionnaires were used to identify dominant personality traits, the presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression, a questionnaire to assess the quality of life: Leonhard’s characterological questionnaire; scale of assessment of motivation approved by D. Marlow and D. Crown; multifactorial personality questionnaire 16PF (Sixteen Personaflity Factor Questionnaire, 16PF) by R. Kettel; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS); methodology for assessing the quality of life “SF-36 health status survey”.
Results.
In the course of the study, data were obtained indicating positive dynamics of the psychoemotional state of patients who underwent surgical treatment and are in rehabilitation. The need for such rehabilitation from a psychiatric point of view is due to the presence of formed personality anomalies and reactive states of the anxiety-depressive spectrum in patients. There were mainly unmarried women at the age of 19—29. All patients worked and studied, 68% of them had a higher education. Emotive (34,9%), hyperthymic (27,9%), exalted (23,2%) traits predominated in patients with congenital anomalies of maxilla-facial region. The dynamics of the approval from others showed a tendency to reduce the need of patients after rehabilitation for approval from others (from 8% to 25%). The subsyndromal depressive symptoms are completely reduced (up to 100%) during the rehabilitation course. The analysis of the results indicated a positive distinct dynamics (improvement) of the patients’ condition in terms of such indicators as “calmness’’, “low anxiety”, “trustfulness” and “conformism”. Patients at the end of rehabilitation noted a decrease in the intensity of pain and its impact on the ability to engage in daily activities, increased energy and its improved overall health and social functioning with a positive assessment of the patient’s current state of health and prospects for treatment in the future.

Key words:

skeletal forms of occlusion anomalies, rehabilitation, psycho-emotional state, psychometric examination

For Citation

[1]
Slabkovsky R.I., Drobysheva N.S., Slabkovskaya A.B., Drobyshev A.Yu., Medvedev V.E., Uspenskaya M.O. Possibilities of psychological and psychiatric rehabilitation of adult patients after orthognatic surgery. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 24 (2): 65—71

Introduction

At the background of the development of maxillofacial surgery in recent decades, interest in the study of pathopsychological and mental disorders in patients with skeletal forms of malocclusions of the dentition has not weakened. The main vectors of research are aimed at describing constitutional and acquired personal anomalies, variants of pathological mental developments in patients with pathology of the maxillofacial region [1, 3, 7, 8, 12—15]. Some works present data on the role of surgical methods of treatment on the dynamics of psychopathological disorders [2, 6, 10, 11, 16—19]. In particular, in the study of A.V. Kovalenko and co-authors, it was noted that patients with skeletal forms of occlusion anomalies had a tendency to introversion in 24.18% of cases, a tendency to neuroticism in 19.44%, a tendency to dependence in 52% and a tendency to avoid fighting in 67%, which indicates the presence of problems when communicating in a group and poor social adaptation. After complex treatment, the author revealed a change in the psychological state of patients [5].

Individual features of the psychoemotional sphere of patients with skeletal occlusion anomalies complicate the course of the postoperative rehabilitation period, due to physical and functional discomfort, decreased social activity and emotional lability [10].

At the same time, there is almost no data on the impact of rehabilitation measures following the surgical stage of treatment on the course of mental and pathocharacteristic processes.

The aim of study was to assess the impact of methods of rehabilitation of adult patients after orthognathic operations on the psychoemotional state of patients.

Materials and methods

There was an examination of 42 patients (33 women, 9 men), hospitalized for planned orthognathic operations on the upper and lower jaws in the hospital of the clinic. The average age was 27.5±7.4 years.

The study included patients with diagnosed jaw anomalies aged 18—55 years who underwent orthodontic, surgical and rehabilitation stages of combined treatment.

The study did not include patients with myasthenia and myasthenia-like syndromes, acute infectious diseases, hemophilia, high myopia, somatic and mental (schizophrenia, affective disorders, schizoaffective psychosis) diseases in the acute stage, dementia, taking muscle relaxants, anticoagulants, antibiotics from the group of aminoglycosides, tetracycline, polymyxin, alcohol abusers, pregnant and lactating women.

During the rehabilitation procedures, the reprogramming of the bioelectric activity of the muscles of the maxillofacial region was carried out by the method of hardware myostimulation (MIO-STIM, Biotronic, Italy) in the relaxation mode, acupuncture and kinesiotapes Kine Xib Ultraviolet (China).

Methods of examination of patients included a psychometric method using validated scales and statistical analysis.

Psychometric examination of patients was carried out before the beginning of the course of rehabilitation procedures and after its completion. During the psychometric examination, a battery of scales and questionnaires was used to identify dominant personality traits, the presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and a questionnaire to assess the quality of life. The K. Leonhard questionnaire (1976) is designed to identify character accentuations. The questionnaire includes 88 questions, 10 scales corresponding to certain character accentuations. The first scale characterizes a person with high vital activity; the second scale shows excitable accentuation. The third scale indicates the depth of the emotional life of the subject. The fourth scale shows a tendency to pedantry. The fifth scale reveals increased anxiety, the sixth — a tendency to mood swings, the seventh scale indicates the demonstrativeness of the behavior of the subject, the eighth — the unbalanced behavior. The ninth scale shows the degree of fatigue, the tenth — the strength and severity of the emotional response.

The scale of assessment of the motivation of approval by D. Marlowe and D. Crown is aimed at identifying the motivation of approval and, consequently, the willingness of a person to appear better, to present himself to others as fully conforming to social norms [9].

The multifactorial personality questionnaire 16PF (Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, 16PF) by R. Kettel is intended for writing a wide range of individual personality traits [4]. A distinctive feature of this questionnaire is its focus on identifying relatively independent 16 factors (scales, primary traits) of a person. The individual factors assessed using the questionnaire are combined into three blocks: intellectual, emotional-volitional block and communicative.

The hospital Anxiety and Depression Assessment Scale (HADS) allows us to reliably assess the absence/presence (“subclinically expressed” or “clinically expressed”) symptoms of anxiety and depression [24].

The methodology for assessing the quality of life SF-36 Health Status Survey consists of 11 sections, the results are presented in the form of scores on 8 scales, compiled in such a way that a higher score indicates a better quality of life [23]. The following indicators are quantified: the general assessment of the patient's current state of health (GH) and the prospects for treatment, physical functioning (PF), reflecting the degree to which health limits the performance of physical exertion (self-care, walking, climbing stairs, carrying weights, etc.), the influence of physical condition (RP) on role functioning (work, performing everyday activities), the influence of emotional state (RE) on role functioning (assumes an assessment of the degree of, in which an emotional state interferes with the performance of work or other daily activities, including an increase in time spent, a decrease in the volume of work performed, a decrease in the quality of its performance, etc.), social functioning (SF, is determined by the degree to which a physical or emotional state restricts social activity and communication), the intensity of pain (BP) and its impact on the ability to engage in daily activities, including housework and outside the home, vitality (VT, implies feeling full of strength and energy or, conversely, exhausted) and self-assessment of mental health (MH, characterizes mood, the presence of depression, anxiety, a general indicator of positive emotions).

Results

When assessing the socio-demographic characteristics of the surveyed, it was determined that all 43 (100%) patients in the sample worked or studied. More than half of the surveyed had a higher education, were not married and their age was in the range from 19 to 29 years (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics (n=42)
Gender Values %
  • male
  • 9 21.43
  • female
  • 33 78.57
    Education
  • higher
  • 27 67.50
  • secondary special
  • 4 10.00
  • secondary
  • 9 22.50
    Marital status
  • divorced
  • 2 5.26
  • married
  • 10 26.32
  • single
  • 26 68.42
    Age
  • 18
  • 3 8.11
  • 19—29
  • 19 51.36
  • 30—39
  • 11 29.72
  • 40—55
  • 4 10.81
    Median 27.5  

    According to the assessment according to the Leonhard Questionnaire in patients undergoing rehabilitation, emotive, hyperthymic, exalted traits prevailed, which corresponds to the descriptions of hypercompensation variants of personal development found in the literature in patients with congenital anomalies of maxillofacial area (Table. 2) [20—22].

    Table 2. Characterological profile of patients according to the Leonhard Questionnaire
    Personality traits Values %
    Demonstrative 9 20.90
    Hyperthymic 12 27.91
    Emotive 15 34.88
    Stuck 6 13.95
    Exalted 10 23.26
    Pedantic 5 11.63
    Disturbing 2 4.65
    Cyclothymic 2 4.65
    Excitable 1 2.33
    Total: 62* 144.19*

    * In 19 patients, traits of 2—3 types were equally dominant

    The dynamics of the indicator of seeking approval from others on the Scale of assessment of the motivation of approval by D. Marlowe and D. Crown (Table 3) showed a tendency to reduce the need of patients after rehabilitation for approval from others. An increase in the number of patients with low scores on the scale indicated that they acquired self-confidence without the need for external approval, adequate positive self-esteem, recognition of their right to make mistakes, and can also speak of a high level of self-demanding turning into self-criticism.

    Table 3. Patients' search for external approval by Marlowe and Crown approval motivation rating scale (in %)
    Approval motivation Before After
    Low 7.50 25.00
    Medium 75.00 68.75
    High 17.50 6.25
    Total 100.00 100.00

    According to the hospital scale of anxiety and depression (Table. 4) the following correlations are established. Against the background of the rehabilitation course, subsyndromal depressive symptoms are completely reduced, while subclinical anxiety has multidirectional trends: in 2 patients, anxiety increases, in 3 patients it is reduced to the normal level. This can be explained both by the different effectiveness of the rehabilitation course, the presence/absence of complications of surgical treatment, and external psychoemotional stressors.

    Table 4. Dynamics of anxiety and depression severity (according to HADS) on the background of rehabilitation (in %)
    Severity of symptoms Anxiety Depression
    before after before after
    No 68.75 77.25 81.25 100.00
    Subclinical 25.00 12.61 18.75 0.00
    Clinically expressed 6.25 10.05 0.00 0.00
    Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

    Analysis of the results of the Kettel test (Table. 5) indicated a positive distinct dynamics (improvement) of the patients' condition in terms of such indicators as “calmness”, “low anxiety”, “trustfulness” and “conformism”.

    Negative dynamics (decreased severity) was noted in patients according to the indicators “timidity”, “suspicion”, “straightforwardness”, “conservatism”, “low self-control”, “isolation/introversion”, “sensitivity/vulnerability” and “conformity/dependence”.

    The clinically described dynamics was realized by a decrease in indecision, insularity, resentment, suspicion, anxiety, irritability, short temper, difficulties in independent decision-making, while simultaneously expanding the circle of communication, increased activity, self-confidence, determination in the implementation of the plan.

    Table 5. Dynamics of patients' condition according to R. Kettel's Multivariate personal questionnaire
    Factor Before After
    mean median mean median
    (closeness-sociability) 5.49 5.0 5.06 5.0
    (intelligence) 4.67 5.0 4.53 5.0
    (emotional instability — emotional stability) 6.62 7.0 6.06 7.0
    (subordination-dominance) 8.17 6.0 5.50 6.0
    (restraint — expressiveness) 5.17 5.0 5.24 5.0
    (low normativity of behavior — high normativity of behavior) 6.10 6.0 6.00 6.0
    (timidity — courage) 4.86 5.0 4.63 4.5
    (stiffness-sensitivity) 4.86 5.0 4.81 5.0
    (credulity-suspicion) 8.78 7.0 7.00 5.94
    (trustfulness — suspicion) 5.05 5.0 5.13 6.0
    (straightforwardness — diplomacy) 5.40 5.5 5.00 5.0
    (calmness — anxiety) 6.48 6.5 6.88 7.0
    Q1 (conservatism — radicalism) 4.88 5.0 4.06 3.0
    Q2 (conformism — nonconformism) 4.73 5.0 5.00 5.5
    Q3 (low self-control — high self-control) 6.46 7.0 6.31 6.5
    Q4 (relaxation — tension) 4.55 5.0 4.94 5.0
    F1 (low anxiety — high anxiety) 5.29 5.2 5.16 5.3
    F2 (introversion—extroversion) 5.35 5.7 5.00 4.5
    F3 (sensitivity—balance) 6.23 5.9 6.14 6.1
    F4 (conformity—independence) 4.96 5.05 4.63 4.8

    Thus, there is an obvious tendency to the formation of psychological characteristics that increase the level of social adaptability and adaptation.

    This conclusion was also confirmed by the results of the examination of patients using the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire (Table 6). According to the answers to the questions, by the end of rehabilitation, patients noted a decrease in the intensity of pain sensations and their impact on the ability to engage in daily activities, including work at home and outside the home, increased energy and improved overall health and social functioning with a positive assessment of the patient's current state of health and prospects for treatment in the future.

    Table 6. Dynamics of quality of life indicators against the background of a rehabilitation course (on the SF-26 scale)
    Value Before After
    Mean value median Mean value median
    Physical functioning 94.76 95.0 95.67 95.0
    Role functioning due to the physical state 95.12 100.0 84.38 100.0
    Role functioning due to the emotional state 88.34 100.0 81.26 100.0
    Energy/fatigue 66.34 70.0 67.19 75.0
    Emotional well-being 70.54 72.0 71.25 72.0
    Social functioning 88.28 93.75 89.63 100.0
    Pain intensity 86.72 100.0 84.82 90.0
    General state of health 67.07 70.0 71.25 72.5
    Changes in health 53.05 50.0 60.94 50.0

    Conclusion

    In the course of the study, data were obtained indicating a positive dynamics of the psychoemotional state of patients who underwent surgical treatment and are in rehabilitation.

    The need for such rehabilitation from a psychiatric point of view is due to the presence of formed personality anomalies and reactive states of the anxiety-depressive spectrum in patients [2, 3, 6—8, 24].

    In this study, it was found that persons with congenital anomalies are characterized by constitutional or acquired high sensitivity and impressionability, differ in the depth of experiences in the field of subtle emotions in spiritual life (35% of patients have emotive traits according to the Leonhard questionnaire), the ease of changing affect from joy to depression (23% of patients have exalted traits according to the Leonhard questionnaire) in combination with a thirst for activity, high activity, entrepreneurship (28% of patients have hyperthymic traits).

    At the same time, against the background of surgical treatment and after a course of rehabilitation procedures, patients have a tendency to develop psychological characteristics that increase the level of social adaptability and adaptation. Thus, the data of the psychometric survey on the Scale of evaluation of the motivation of approval by D. Marlowe and D. Crown indicate that they have acquired self-confidence without the need for external approval, an adequate positive self-esteem. According to the multifactorial personal questionnaire, there is a decrease in indecision, isolation, resentment, suspicion, anxiety, irritability, short temper, difficulties in making independent decisions, while simultaneously expanding the circle of communication, increasing activity, self-confidence, and determination in the implementation of the plan.

    The limitations of this study are the impossibility of a differentiated assessment of the contribution to the dynamics of the mental state of patients, the lack of catamnestic data to clarify the stability of the achieved effects.

    References

    1. Arzhantsev P.Z., Vissarionov V.A., Davydov B.N. Reconstructive surgery of soft tissues of the maxillofacial region. A guide for doctors. Moscow: Medicine, 1997 (In Russ.).
    2. Goldstein J., Hanuszkiewicz M. Significance of facial plastic operations in psychical and social rehabilitation. Acta Chir Plast. 1980; 22 (3): 129—33. PMID: 6165165.
    3. Drobyshev A.U., Chantyr I.V., Drobysheva N.S., Medvedev V.E., Frolova V.I., Fofanova Yu.S. Psychometric assessment of the level of anxiety and depression in adult patients with dentofacial anomalies. Medical alphabet. 2015; 22: 39—41 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 26206068.
    4. Kapustina A.N. Multifactorial personal methodology of R. Cattell. St. Petersburg: Speech, 2001. 99 p. (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 20086611.
    5. Kovalenko A.V., Slabkovskaya A.B., Drobysheva N.S., Drobyshev A.Yu., Persin L.S. Psychological status of patients with gnatic forms of occlusion anomalies before and after orthognathic treatment. Russian Stomatology. 2011, 4 (5): 10—4 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 20809978.
    6. Matveev V.F., Popilina S.V., Sergeev A.A. Mental disorders in patients with congenital facial cosmetic defects. Stomatology. 1972: 51: 54—7 (In Russ.).
    7. Medvedev V.E., Drobyshev A.Yu., Frolova V.I., Martynov S.E. The psychopathological and pathocharacteristic disorders in the patients presenting with the injuries to the maxillofacial region (the clinical and therapeutic aspects). Russian Stomatology. 2015; 8 (4): 44—51 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 25594582.
    8. Vissarionov V.A., Medvedev V.E., Martyinov S.E., Frolova V.I. Pathocharacterological and pathopsychological disorders in in plastic surgeon’s and cosmetologist’s patients. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2016; 6 (S1): 81—2 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 28289613.
    9. Raigorodsky D.Ya. (ed.). Methodology for diagnosing self-assessment of approval motivation (Lie scale) by D. Marlowe and D. Crown. In: Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests. Textbook. Samara, 2001. Pp. 635—636 (In Russ.).
    10. Mikhailova V.V. Features of rehabilitation of patients with acquired and congenital deformities of the maxillofacial region in the pre-and postoperative periods of surgical treatment (clinical, psychotherapeutic, psychopharmacological aspects): master’s thesis. Moscow, 1998 (In Russ.).
    11. Panin M.G., Papyrin V.D., Tkhostov A. Sh. Psychological rehabilitation of patients after reconstructive operations in congenital deformed jaw bones. Stomatology. 1991; 70 (1): 47—8 (In Russ.).
    12. Fosfanova Y.S., Medvedev V.E., Frolova V.I., Drobyshev A.Yu., Shipika D.V., Kuznetsov A.N., Zaslavskiy I.D. Psychiatric disorders in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: prevalence, nosological qualification and therapy. Russian Stomatology. 2016; 9 (4): 3—10 (In Russ.). eLIBRARY ID: 28284468.
    13. Brunton G., Paraskeva N., Caird J., Bird K.S., Kavanagh J., Kwan I., Stansfield C., Rumsey N., Thomas J. Psychosocial predictors, assessment, and outcomes of cosmetic procedures: a systematic rapid evidence assessment. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014; 38 (5): 1030—40. PMID: 24962402.
    14. Cash T.F., Smolak L. Body image: a handbook of science, practice, and prevention. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 2011. 490 p.
    15. Dey J.K., Ishii M., Phillis M., Byrne P.J., Boahene K.D.O., Ishii L.E. Body dysmorphic disorder in a facial plastic and reconstructive surgery clinic: measuring prevalence, assessing comorbidities, and validating a feasible screening instrument. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015; 17 (2): 137—43. PMID: 25654334.
    16. Dowling N.A., Honigman R.J., Jackson A.C. The male cosmetic surgery patient: a matched sample gender analysis of elective cosmetic surgery and cosmetic dentistry patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64 (6): 726—31. PMID: 20489400.
    17. Gorney M. Recognition and management of the patient unsuitable for aesthetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126 (6): 2268—71. PMID: 21124170.
    18. Herruer J.M., Prins J.B., Heerbeek N., Verhage-Damen G.W.J.A., Ingels K.J.A.O. Negative predictors for satisfaction in patients seeking facial cosmetic surgery: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135 (6): 1596—605. PMID: 26017596.
    19. Jacono A., Chastant R.P., Dibelius G. Association of Patient Self-esteem With Perceived Outcome After Face-lift Surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016; 18 (1): 42—6. PMID: 26513061.
    20. Sarcu D., Adamson P. Psychology of the Facelift Patient. Facial Plast Surg. 2017; 33 (3): 252—9. PMID: 28571061.
    21. Sarwer D.B., Whitaker L.A. Psychology of plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic clinical review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128 (3): 827—8. PMID: 21866029.
    22. Sinno S., Schwitzer J., Anzai L., Thorne C.H. Face-lift satisfaction using the FACE-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136 (2): 239—42. PMID: 25909302.
    23. Ware J.E. jr, Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30 (6): 473—83. PMID: 1593914.
    24. Zigmond A.S., Snaith R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67 (6): 361—70. PMID: 6880820.

    Received

    March 30, 2021

    Accepted

    May 9, 2021

    Published on

    June 1, 2021