DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2021_1_160

Study of the quality of life of patients using the QL PAER specific questionnaire after prosthetic auricular reconstruction

Downloads

Authors

  • S.D. Arutyunov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6512-8724
  • D.I. Polyakov 1, assistant at the Dentistry diseases propaedeutics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1284-0093
  • S.A. Muslov 1, PhD in Biological Sciences, full professor of the Normal physiology and medical physics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9752-6804
  • A.E. Kharazyan 1, prosthodontist at the Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4657-1437
  • A.G. Stepanov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Prosthetic dentistry Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6543-0998
  • N.B. Astashina 2, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor and head of the Prosthodontics Department
    ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1135-7833
  • 1 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
  • 2 Perm State Medical University, 614000, Perm, Russia

Abstract

The patients quality of life (QL) after auricle prosthetic reconstruction was studied using the proposed specialized questionnaire QL PAER. According to the QL PAER it was found that the overall patients QL index associated with health and the previous mentioned prosthetics in patients with silicone epithese of the auricle was higher than before the procedure (p<0.05). In the comparative aspect, the general QL questionnaire WHOQoL was less sensitive than the QL PAER when determining the QL index of this category of patients. The created mini-program QL PAER allows to minimize routine calculations, to differentiate and evaluate the all questionnaire domains data contribution to the QL index: aesthetics, discomfort and communication, behavioral response, depression, professional activity, functionality. Also using this mini-program allows to determine the overall QL index of patients before and after auricle prosthetic reconstruction.

Key words:

microtia, anotia, ear auricle, prosthetic reconstruction, quality of life

For Citation

[1]
Arutyunov S.D., Polyakov D.I., Muslov S.A., Kharazyan A.E., Stepanov A.G., Astashina N.B. Study of the quality of life of patients using the QL PAER specific questionnaire after prosthetic auricular reconstruction. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2021; 1 (97): 160—164. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2021_1_160

References

  1. McGoldrick D.M., Fragoso-Iñiguez M., Lawrence T., McMillan K. Maxillofacial injuries in patients with major trauma. — Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. — 2018; 56 (6): 496—500. PMID: 29735181
  2. Mileshina N.A., Osipenkov S.S., Tavartkiladze G.A. The management of patients with congenital malformations of the external and middle ear. — Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. — 2018; 4: 51—5 (In Russ.).
  3. Federspil P.A. Auricular Prostheses in Microtia. — Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. — 2018; 26 (1): 97—104. PMID: 29153193
  4. Grant B.F., Hasin D.S., Stinson F.S., Dawson D.A., Chou S.P., Ruan W.J., Pickering R.P. Prevalence, correlates, and disability of personality disorders in the United States: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. — J Clin Psychiatry. — 2004; 65 (7): 948—58. PMID: 15291684
  5. Luquetti D.V., Heike C.L., Hing A.V., Cunningham M.L., Cox T.C. Microtia: epidemiology and genetics. — Am J Med Genet A. — 2012; 158A (1): 124—39. PMID: 22106030
  6. Yen C.-F., Chen C.-C., Lee Y., Tang T.-C., Ko C.-H., Yen J.-Y. Association between quality of life and self-stigma, insight, and adverse effects of medication in patients with depressive disorders. — Depress Anxiety. — 2009; 26 (11): 1033—9. PMID: 19288581
  7. Goiato M.C., Takamiya A.S., Alves L.M.N., dos Santos D.M. Postsurgical care for rehabilitation with implant-retained extraoral prostheses. — J Craniofac Surg. — 2010; 21 (2): 565—7. PMID: 20216436
  8. Kievit H., Verhage-Damen G.W.J.A., Ingels K.J., Mylanus E.A.M., Hol M.K.S. Long-term quality of life assessment in patients with auricular prostheses. — J Craniofac Surg. — 2013; 24 (2): 392—7. PMID: 23524701
  9. Younis I., Gault D., Sabbagh W., Kang N.V. Patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes after ear reconstruction with a Branemark-type, bone-anchored, ear prosthesis: a 16 year review. — J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. — 2010; 63 (10): 1650—5. PMID: 20356815
  10. Evsina O.V. The quality of life in medicine — an important indicator of patient health status (review). — Personality in a Changing World: Health, Adaptation, Development. — 2013; 1: 119—33 (In Russ.).
  11. Gileva O.S., Khalilayeva E.V., Libik T.V., Podgornii R.V., Khaliavina I.N., Gileva E.S. Multistage validation of the international quality-of-life questionnaire “Oral health impact profile” OHIP-49-RU. — Ural Medical Journal. — 2009; 8: 104—9 (In Russ.).
  12. Gurevich K.G., Barer G.M., Fabrikant E.G., Smiryagina V.V. Quality of life is a new humanistic direction in medicine. — Cathedra. — 2006; 2: 62—5 (In. Russ.).
  13. de Souza R.F., Terada A.S.S.D., Vecchia M.P.D., Regis R.R., Zanini A.P., Compagnoni M.A. Validation of the Brazilian versions of two inventories for measuring oral health-related quality of life of edentulous subjects. — Gerodontology. — 2012; 29 (2): e88—95. PMID: 20735490
  14. Gil-Montoya J.A., Subirá C., Ramón J.M., González-Moles M.A. Oral health-related quality of life and nutritional status. — J Public Health Dent. — 2008; 68 (2): 88—93. PMID: 18248335
  15. Gileva O.S., Libik T.V., Khalilayeva E.V., Danilov K.V., Khalyavina I.N., Gileva Ye.S., Sadilova V.A., Plenkina Yu.A., Khokhrin D.V. Dental health in life quality criteria. — Bashkortostan Medical Journal. — 2011; 3: 6—11 (In Russ.).
  16. Hassel A.J., Danner D., Schmitt M., Nitschke I., Rammelsberg P., Wahl H.-W. Oral health-related quality of life is linked with subjective well-being and depression in early old age. — Clin Oral Investig. — 2011; 15 (5): 691—7. PMID: 20582443
  17. Kosyakov S.Ya., Minavnina Yu.V., Gunenkov A.V. The evaluation of the quality of life in the patients presenting with various forms of chronic otitis media. — Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. — 2017; 82 (5): 26—7 (In Russ.).
  18. Pushkar D.Yu., Dyakov V.V., Bernikov A.N. Quality of life is a new paradigm of medicine. — Pfarmateca. — 2005; 11: 15—6 (In Russ.).
  19. Skulmoski G.J., Hartman F.T., Krahn J. The Delphi method for graduate research. — Journal of Information Technology Education: Research. — 2007; 6 (33): 1—21. DOI: 10.28945/199
  20. Turoff M. The design of a policy Delphi. — Technological Forecasting and Social Change. — 1970; 2 (2): 149—71. DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7

Downloads

Received

January 20, 2021

Published on

March 1, 2021