DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_54

Bone augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxillae by using a membrane based on a titanium thread

Authors

  • A.A. Kulakov 1, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD in Medical Sciences, director
  • V.A. Badalyan 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, leading researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • A.S. Kasparov 1, PhD in Medical sciences, researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology department, dentistry surgeon
  • Z.M. Stepanyan 1, PhD in Medical sciences, researcher at the Clinical and experimental implantology department, dentistry surgeon
  • V.A. Brutyan 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division, dental surgeon
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Severe ridge atrophy in the anterior maxilla represents one of the most challenging clinical situation in the bone regeneration arena. Combination of right surgical technique using various biomaterials and gentle soft tissue management is needed to obtain successful outcomes. The present case series describes a novel approach to increasing the volume of bone deficiencies in the anterior atrophied maxillae by using a mixture of autologous and anorganic bovine bone and membranes based on a titanium thread. By combining soft and hard tissue grafts, optimum esthetic and long-term implant prosthesis stability can be achieved and sustained.

Key words:

guided bone regeneration, jaw atrophy, titanium mesh

For Citation

[1]
Kulakov A.A., Badalyan V.A., Kasparov A.S., Stepanyan Z.M., Brutyan V.A. Bone augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxillae by using a membrane based on a titanium thread. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 1 (93): 54—58. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_54

References

  1. Carlsson G.E. Changes in the jaws and facial profile after extractions and prosthetic treatment. — Trans R Sch Dent Stockh Umea. — 1967; 12: 1—29.
  2. Pietrokovski J., Massler M. Residual ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in monkeys. — J Prosthet Dent. — 1971; 26 (2): 119—29.
  3. Sirac S.V., Dagueva M.V. Treatment and prevention of inflammatory and atrophic complications after tooth extraction. — In: proceedings of the scientific-practical conference “Actual issues of modern dentistry”. — Smolensk, 2010: 74—75 (In Russ.).
  4. Schropp L., Wenzel A., Kostopoulos L., Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. — Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. — 2003; 23 (4): 313—23.
  5. Van der Weijden F., Dell’Acqua F., Slot D.E. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. — J Clin Periodontol. — 2009; 36 (12): 1048—58.
  6. Smbatyan B.S. Bone tissue restoration in the treatment of patients using dental implants in various clinical situations: MD thesis. — Moscow, 2012: 327 p. (In Russ.).
  7. Wang H.L., Al-Shammari K. HVC ridge deficiency classification: a therapeutically oriented classification. — Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. — 2002; 22 (4): 335—43.
  8. McAllister B.S., Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. — J Periodontol. — 2007; 78 (3): 377—96.
  9. Chiapasco M., Zaniboni M., Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. — Clin Oral Implants Res. — 2006; 17 (Suppl 2): 136—59.
  10. Urban I.A., Lozada J.L., Jovanovic S.A., Nagursky H., Nagy K. Vertical ridge augmentation with titanium-reinforced, dense-PTFE membranes and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 19 patients. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2014; 29 (1): 185—93.
  11. Rocchietta I., Fontana F., Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. — J Clin Periodontol. — 2008; 35 (8 Suppl): 203—15.
  12. Merli M., Moscatelli M., Mariotti G., Rotundo R., Bernardelli F., Nieri M. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial. — Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. — 2014; 29 (4): 905—13.

Published on

April 1, 2020