DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_18

Combined antibacterial chemotherapy odontogenic infection—why Ciprofloxacin with Tinidazole?

Authors

  • V.N. Tsarev 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Microbiology, virology, immunology Department, director of the Medico-dental research Institute
  • A.Y. Drobyshev 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor of the Maxillofacial and plastic surgery Department
  • E.V. Ippolitov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, professor of the Microbiology, virology, immunology department, leading researcher
  • A.A. Labazanov 1, PhD in Medical sciences, researcher at the Medico-dental research Institute
  • M.S. Podporin 1, junior researcher at the Medico-dental research Institute
  • T.V. Tsareva 1, PhD in Medical sciences, associate professor of the Microbiology, virology, immunology department
  • Y.A. Trefilova 1, researcher at the Medico-dental research Institute
  • 1 Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Aim: substantiation and expansion of the range of application in dentistry of the combined antibacterial chemotherapy ciprofloxacin with tinidazole based on the use of automated cultivation of pathogens and scanning electron microscopy of an experimental biofilm. Materials and methods. In the experimental part of the work, strains were used — clinical isolates of obligate-anaerobic bacteria Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Streptococcus sanguis, as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain (MRSA) for control. Sequential colonization of the material (methyl polyacrylate) for the formation of the biofilm was performed by S. sanguis, F. nucleatum, P. intermedia. Then, in parallel, the studied preparations were added in working concentrations: amoxicillin+sodium clavulanate and ciprofloxacin+tinidazole (Tsifran ST). To evaluate the activity of chemotherapeutic agents on planktonic forms of bacteria, a system for automated cultivation on the apparatus “RTS-1” (Latvia) was used. To control the biofilm eradication, scanning electron microscopy after 7 days of cultivation. Results. It was found that the MPC of Tsifran ST with automated cultivation of populations was 12.5 mg/l (for ciprofloxacin), which was not inferior to the similar effect of amoxicillin+clavulanate. Unlike the beta-lactam antibiotic, Tsifran ST was also active against the MRSA strain. According to electron microscopy data of a three-component biofilm (S. sanguis, F. nucleatum, P. intermedia) at a concentration of 12.5 mg/l, complete destruction of the biofilm mantle and partial damage to microbial cells by Tsifran ST was established, while amoxicillin+clavulanate did not have such an effect. Conclusion. Ciprofloxacin+tinidazole has an advantage over the amoxicillin+clavulanate for the eradication of an anaerobic biofilm.

Key words:

ciprofloxacin, tinidazole, amoxicillin sodium clavulanate, automated cultivation, obligate-anaerobic bacteria, MRSA, scanning electron microscopy, biofilm

For Citation

[1]
Tsarev V.N., Drobyshev A.Y., Ippolitov E.V., Labazanov A.A., Podporin M.S., Tsareva T.V., Trefilova Y.A. Combined antibacterial chemotherapy odontogenic infection—why Ciprofloxacin with Tinidazole?. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2020; 1 (93): 18—24. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2020_1_18

References

  1. Ippolitov E.V., Tsarev V.N. Quinolones and fluoroquinolones. — In: Yushchuk N.D., Balmasova I.P., Tsarev V.N. (eds.) Antibiotics and anti-infectious immunity. — Moscow: Practical medicine, 2012: 208—220 (In Russ.).
  2. Ippolitov E.V., Didenko L.V., Tsarev V.N. The characteristics of morphology of biofilm of periodontium under inflammatory diseases of gums (chronic catarrhal gingivitis, chronic periodontitis, Candida-associated periodontitis) according results of electronic microscopy. — Russian Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. — 2015; 12: 59—64 (In Russ.).
  3. Kuzmina E.M. Yanushevich O.O. Kuzmina I.N. Dental morbidity in the Russian population. Epidemiological dental examination of the population of Russia. — Moscow: MSMSU, 2019: 13—23 (In Russ.).
  4. Makeeva I.M., Daurova F.YU., Byakova S.F., Ippolitov E.V., Gostev M.S., Polikushina A.O., Shubin E.A. The sensitivity of microbial associations of the exudate of the periodontal pocket and the odontogenic focus to antibacterial drugs. — Stomatology. — 2016; 3: 26—30 (In Russ.).
  5. Ippolitov E.V., Tsarev V.N., Arutyunov S.D., Stepanov A.G., Podporin M.S., Shishova V.G., Malazoniya T.T. Method for forming of combined periodontal anaerobic bacteria biofilm under fluid conditions in vitro. — Patent for invention RU 2619169, 12.05.2017 by req. No. 2015149913, 20.11.2015 (In Russ.).
  6. Ushakov R.V., Tsarev V.N. Antimicrobial therapy in dentistry. Principles and algorithms (a guide for doctors). — Moscow: Practical medicine, 2019: 123, 219—231 (In Russ.).
  7. Tsarev V.N., Ushakov R.V., Nikolaeva E.N. Microbiota and immune processes of odontogenic infection. — In: Tsarev V.N. (ed.) Microbiology, virology, immunology of oral cavity. — Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019: 567—612 (In Russ.).
  8. Yanushevich O.O., Akhmedov G.D., Panin A.M., Arutyunov S.D., Tsarev V.N. Microecology of the oral cavity and infectious and inflammatory complications in surgical dentistry (monograph). — Moscow: Practical medicine, 2019: 125—165 (In Russ.).
  9. Astasov-Frauenhoffer M., Braissant O., Hauser-Gerspach I., Weiger R., Walter C., Zitzmann N.U., Waltimo T. Microcalorimetric determination of the effects of amoxicillin, metronidazole, and their combination on in vitro biofilm. — J Periodontol. — 2014; 85 (2): 349—57.
  10. Belibasakis G.N., Thurnheer T. Validation of antibiotic efficacy on in vitro subgingival biofilms. — J Periodontol. — 2014; 85 (2): 343—8.
  11. Bisharat N., Goldstein L., Raz R., Elias M. Gram-Negative anaerobic endocarditis: two case reports and review of the literature. — Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. — 2001; 20 (9): 651—4.
  12. Bokeria L.A., Muratov R.M., Shamsiev G.A., Tsarev V.N., Sarkisyan M.A., Lukina G.I., Nikolaeva Е.N. Development of molecular genetic methods of diagnostics and antibacterial prophylaxis of infective endocarditis of odontogenic nature. — Dental Forum. — 2011; 1 (37): 6—9 (In Russ.).
  13. Larsen T. Susceptibility of Porphyromonas gingivalis in biofilms to amoxicillin, doxycycline and metronidazole. — Oral Microbiol Immunol. — 2002; 17 (5): 267—71.
  14. Paturel L., Casalta J.P., Habib G., Nezri M., Raoult D. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans endocarditis. — Clin Microbiol Infect. — 2004; 10 (2): 98—118.
  15. Vaze S., Sharma G., Shah S., Kathariya R. Comparative efficacies of Amoxicillin and Moxifloxacin in Prevention of Bacteremia following Dental Extraction. — IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. — 2013; 4 (11): 62—6.
  16. Wang Q., Zhou X., Huang D. Role for Porphyromonas gingivalis in the progression of atherosclerosis. — Med Hypotheses. — 2009; 72 (1): 71—3.

Published on

April 1, 2020