DOI:

10.37988/1811-153X_2019_1_58

Comparative assessment of the surface composition and shape of the dental implant and the results of energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

Downloads

Authors

  • A.A. Kulakov 1, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD in Medical Sciences, full professor
  • A.S. Kasparov 1, PhD in Medical Sciences, dental surgeon at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • D.A. Porfenchuk 1, postgraduate at the Clinical and experimental implantology Division
  • I.S. Donskoy 1, prosthodontist
  • 1 Central Research Institute of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, 119021, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

In the implantology of recent years, great importance is attached to the primary stability of dental implants, which allows the implementation of early functional load protocols that facilitate the life of the patient and optimize the integration process. To increase the primary stability, various methods are used to modify the surface of the implant. In our work, we present a review of the main literature data on dental implants of three companies: AstraTech, Thommen and Konmet, modern ideas about the biomechanics of implants, as well as the results of our X-ray spectroscopic study of the implant surfaces produced by these companies. Based on the data obtained, we analyzed the relationships between their structure and properties.

Key words:

implantation, dental implant, osseointegration, coating, functional load

For Citation

[1]
Kulakov A.A., Kasparov A.S., Porfenchuk D.A., Donskoy I.S. Comparative assessment of the surface composition and shape of the dental implant and the results of energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2019; 1 (89): 58—62. DOI: 10.37988/1811-153X_2019_1_58

References

  1. Старикова С.Л. Влияние анодного окисления на пассивацию имплантата и протеза. - Вестник проблем биологии и медицины. - 2013; 1: 297-9.
  2. Хасанова Л.Р. Перспектива использования имплантатов из нанотитана в стоматологии. - Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. - 2010; 1: 62-4.
  3. Шубладзе Г.К. Сравнение преимуществ анодированной поверхности имплантата с другими видами поверхностей. - Медицинский алфавит. - 2014; 13: 20-5.
  4. Alshehri M., Alshehri F. Influence of implant shape (tapered vs cylindrical) on the survival of dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. - Implant Dent. - 2016; 25 (6): 855-860.
  5. Buser D., Janner S.F., Wittneben J.G., Brägger U., Ramseier C.A., Salvi G.E. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. - Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. - 2012; 14 (6): 839-51.
  6. Coelho P.G., Jimbo R., Tovar N., Bonfante E.A. Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales. - Dent Mater. - 2015; 31 (1): 37-52.
  7. Dohan Ehrenfest D.M., Coelho P.G., Kang B.S., Sul Y.T., Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. - Trends Biotechnol. - 2010; 28 (4): 198-206.
  8. van Eekeren P., Said C., Tahmaseb A., Wismeijer D. Resonance frequency analysis of thermal acid-etched, hydrophilic implants during first 3 months of healing and osseointegration in an early-loading protocol. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2015; 30 (4): 843-50.
  9. Funato A., Yamada M., Ogawa T. Success rate, healing time, and implant stability of photofunctionalized dental implants. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2013; 28 (5): 1261-71.
  10. Le Guéhennec L., Soueidan A., Layrolle P., Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. - Dent Mater. - 2007; 23 (7): 844-54.
  11. Guljé F., Abrahamsson I., Chen S., Stanford C., Zadeh H., Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2013; 24 (12): 1325-31.
  12. den Hartog L., Meijer H.J.A., Vissink A., Raghoebar G.M. Anterior single implants with different neck designs: 5 Year results of a randomized clinical trial. - Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. - 2017; 19 (4): 717-24.
  13. Lachmann S., Laval J.Y., Axmann D., Weber H. Influence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. - Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. - 2011; 26 (2): 347-55.
  14. Lee D.W., Choi Y.S., Park K.H., Kim C.S., Moon I.S. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2007; 18 (4): 465-70.
  15. Maiorana C., King P., Quaas S., Sondell K., Worsaae N., Galindo-Moreno P. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow-diameter implants: 3 years follow-up. - Clin Oral Implants Res. - 2015; 26 (1): 77-82.
  16. Makowiecki A., Botzenhart U., Seeliger J., Heinemann F., Biocev P., Dominiak M. A comparative study of the effectiveness of early and delayed loading of short tissue-level dental implants with hydrophilic surfaces placed in the posterior section of the mandible-A preliminary study. - Ann Anat. - 2017; 212: 61-68.
  17. Niu W., Wang P., Zhu S., Liu Z., Ji P. Marginal bone loss around dental implants with and without microthreads in the neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis. - J Prosthet Dent. - 2017; 117 (1): 34-40.
  18. Östman P.O., Wennerberg A., Ekestubbe A., Albrektsson T. Immediate occlusal loading of NanoTite™ tapered implants: a prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study. - Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. - 2013; 15 (6): 809-18.
  19. Quaranta A., Piemontese M., Rappelli G., Sammartino G., Procaccini M. Technical and biological complications related to crown to implant ratio: a systematic review. - Implant Dent. - 2014; 23 (2): 180-7.
  20. Valente M.L., de Castro D.T., Shimano A.C., Lepri C.P., dos Reis A.C. Analysis of the influence of implant shape on primary stability using the correlation of multiple methods. - Clin Oral Investig. - 2015; 19 (8): 1861-6.
  21. Valles C., Rodríguez-Ciurana X., Nart J., Santos A., Galofre M., Tarnow D. Influence of implant neck surface and placement depth on crestal bone changes around platform-switched implants: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. - J Periodontol. - 2017; 88 (11): 1200-1210.
  22. Wilson T.G. Jr, Miller R.J., Trushkowsky R., Dard M. Tapered Implants in Dentistry: Revitalizing Concepts with Technology: A Review. - Adv Dent Res. - 2016; 28 (1): 4-9.

Downloads

Published on

March 1, 2019