Characteristics of the materials used for the restoration of the tooth stump, on the example of the material Dento Core

Authors

  • V.A. Osipova 1, к.м.н., доцент кафедры пропедевтики стоматологических заболеваний
  • I.N. Antonova 1, д.м.н., зав. кафедрой пропедевтики стоматологических заболеваний
  • E.G. Rida 1, клинический ординатор II года обучения кафедры пропедевтики стоматологических заболеваний
  • 1 Первый Санкт-Петербургский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. И.П. Павлова

Abstract

The article presents comparative characteristics of the restorative materials used to restore decayed teeth stump. Shown high efficiency of application of the material Dento Core Body (France), and experimentally using Atomic Force Microscopy studies.

Key words:

restoration of the stump of the tooth, Dento Core Body

For Citation

[1]
Osipova V.A., Antonova I.N., Rida E.G. Characteristics of the materials used for the restoration of the tooth stump, on the example of the material Dento Core. Clinical Dentistry (Russia).  2016; 3 (79): 26—31

References

  1. Morgano S.M., Brackett S.E. Foundation restorations of fixed prosthodontics: current knowledge and future needs. - J Prosthet Dent. - 1999; 82: 643-57.
  2. Schillingburg H.T., Hobo S., Whitsett L.D., Jacobi R., Brackett S.E. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3d ed. - Chicago: Quintessence, 1997. - 185 p.
  3. Wilson P.H.R., Fisher N.L., Bartlett D.W. Direct core materials. - Dent Update. - 2003; 30: 362-8.
  4. Sidhu S.K., Watson T.F. Resin-modified glass-ionomer material. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. - Am J Dent. - 1995; 8: 59-67.
  5. Naasan M.A., Watson T.F. Conventional glass-ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. - Am J Dent. - 1998; 11: 36-45.
  6. Azer S.S., Drummond J.L., Campbell S.D. Influence of core buildup material on fatigue strength of an all-ceramic crown. - J Prosthet Dent. - 2001; 86: 624-31.
  7. Olivia R.A., Lowe J.A. Dimensional stability of silver amalgam and composite used as core material. - J Prosthet Dent. - 1987; 57: 554-9.
  8. Brunton P.A., Christensen G.J., Cheung S.W. et al. Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics. - Br Dent J. - 2005; 198: 99-103.
  9. Christensen G.J., Christensen R.P. Product use survey - 1995. - CRA Newsletter. - 1995; 19: 3.
  10. Suzuki M.M. Resent commercial composite formulations. - Oper Dent. - 2001; 960: 145-51.
  11. Combe E.C., Burke F.J.T. Contemporary resin-based composite material for direct placement restorations: packables, flowable and others. - Dent Update. - 2000; 27: 326-36.
  12. Combe E.C., Burke F.J.T. Dental Biomaterials. - London: Kluwer Academic, 1999. - P. 339-344.
  13. Feilzer A.K., DeGree A.J., Davidson C.L. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to the configuration of the restoration. - J Dent Res. - 1987; 66: 1636-9.
  14. Tyas M.J., Jones D.W., Rizkella A.S. The evaluation of resin composite consistency. - Dent Master. - 1998; 14: 424-8.
  15. Максимовская Л.Н., Николаева И.В., Гончаренко А.Д. Опыт клинического применения композитного материала Encore для восстановления коронковой части зуба. - Стоматология сегодня. - 2005; 8.

Published on

September 1, 2016